avatarIt's Ericajean

Summary

The author reflects on the title "Queen," considering personal experiences, historical queens, and the roles of chess pieces as metaphors for personal identity and societal roles.

Abstract

Inspired by Johnny Silvercloud's article "Don't Call Me King," the author ponders the appropriateness of being referred to as a queen, drawing parallels between the game of chess and real-life roles. The author identifies with the queen's powerful position in chess, yet also recognizes moments of feeling like a fraud, given her past self-perception as more of an information source than a regal figure. Historical queens such as Nefertari, Hatshepsut, and Nzinga are highlighted for their leadership and military strategies, contrasting with the author's self-assessment. The piece concludes with the author's ambivalence towards the title, acknowledging its regal connotations and the power it symbolizes, while also being aware of the darker historical context of queens who reigned with terror.

Opinions

  • The author feels that the title "Queen" carries connotations of power and strategy, yet sometimes feels undeserving of such a title due to personal history and self-perception.
  • The author values the concept of standing beside her husband, akin to the queen in chess, rather than behind him, emphasizing equality and shared decision-making.
  • Historical queens are admired for their leadership and contributions, setting a high standard that the author does not feel she has matched.
  • The author recognizes the duality of queens in history, some who were benevolent and others who were tyrannical, influencing her mixed feelings about the title.
  • Despite reservations, the author appreciates being called a queen by her husband, interpreting it as a sign of love and recognition of her qualities.
  • The author suggests that being called a queen can also imply being a supportive partner or a wise advisor, roles she finds more relatable and comfortable.

Should I Be Called A Queen?

Maybe. Here are some exceptions…

Photo by Pixabay

After reading Johnny Silvercloud ‘s “Don’t Call Me King” article, it inspired me to think about what I prefer being called and why. Sometimes introspection is the best tool to have to keep yourself grounded and humble.

The Game of Life v. The Game of Chess

In chess, the Queen is always next to the King.

This is my current position.

I don’t walk behind my husband. I stand beside him. Even if I were not married, I would still consider myself “whole”

My husband carries himself as the victor. As a proud husband. As a King. I am by his side, and we make decisions together. In chess, the queen can make more moves and is the most powerful piece on the board though.

But do you know what the Queen’s original title was in chess?

Advisor.

“I’d like to be queen of people’s hearts.” — Princess Diana

When people (particularly men) call me Queen, I imagine a regal woman who is strategic. A go-getter. Someone who always had high confidence and self-esteem. A woman born into wealth both physical and mental.

I feel like a fraud sometimes.

I definitely do not and did not carry myself as a Queen should when I was growing up. I was more of a princess or better yet, an information key. In my family, I was the human Google. I did not raise my head high, I kept it low to the books, helping friends seek out medical answers, dating advice or questions about the constellations.

When I think about it, in many ways I could be the Rook or the Pawn in the game of chess.

Sometimes I am just as powerful as a queen. Other times I am the foot soldier taking care of business near the trenches.

There were always woman kings

In his article, Johnny says he doesn’t want to be called a King because Kings have subjects.

Peasants.

Kings can be tyrants. In fact, many of them are.

I agree.

Women complain today that men aren’t kings, but I suspect that no one knows the history of how a king REALLY gets down. If you look to the bible, most kings were tyrannical and used other people’s sons on the front lines for war.

They were greedy.

Narcissists.

Stole lands.

Geesh!

Screenshot taken from The Destruction of Black Civilization

After reading the Destruction of Black Civilization, I learned about a few amazing queens.

First up, is Queen Nefertari. She shows up during the 18th Dynasty in Thebes. This was during a time where African leaders were immortalized. Their names ring forever.

Queen Nefertari reportedly had strong leadership skills and helped her son Amenhotep in national reconstruction.

Second, we have the mysterious Queen Hatshepsut, who in history, was referred to as “The Greatest Woman Pharoah” of Egypt. This woman knew when to use her feminine charms to get her way, and also would sometimes arrive to meetings in men’s wear with a full false beard!

It is said she had the mentality of a man and “actively pursued interests closest to her people’s hearts”.

She even built navies for commerce and war and started out as both a regent and a reigning queen.

When I think about those two queens, I am astonished and inspired! No way have I truly built anything close! I don’t have strong leadership skills and I never did anything of significance on a national level.

The one Queen who takes the cake for me though, is Queen Nzinga of Matamba(1580–1663). a.k.a. the “Death Defying Queen” who was one of the greatest military strategists of all time. She confronted the armed forces of Portugal and fought hard against the slave trade.

It is written that when the Portuguese governor did not offer Queen Nzinga a chair to sit in, she used one of her subordinates’ back to sit down upon.

Now that is one bad Mama Jama!

I don’t think I would have been so bold and creative at the same time.

I’m too introverted to be a powerful Queen anyway, but I can research the heck out of a topic!

Do I like being called a Queen?

Sure I do!

It’s positive and apparently in chess, it’s the Queen with much power. Plus, the idea of a Queen has such regal appeal.

Some Queens reigned terror down on people, like Mary Tudor I or “Bloody Mary” who was known for her vigorous attempts at reform through bloody violence — burning several hundred protestants at the stake, lots of beheadings happened during her reign too.

In that regard, no, I’d rather not be called a Queen.

Yet, since a Queen is someone who is by her man’s side and has some power due to him, then yes, I am a Queen by default, and I love when my husband calls me that, because I know it comes from a place of genuine love and perhaps, he sees greater qualities in me than I see in myself.

There are woman kings too.

The reason why fictional Nanisca in The Woman King movie is not considered a Queen, is because she is second to none. She is all woman, yet has all the power of a King.

So, feel free to call me a Queen. Just know that I’ll accept it as you telling me I am next to my King or that I am just a good advisor.

Thank you for reading!

References:

Williams, Chancellor. The Destruction of Black Civilization: Great Issues of a Race From 4500B.C to 2,000 A.D, 1987.

Queen
King
Relationships
Chess
History
Recommended from ReadMedium