Sandra Day O’Connor Did More Damage Than Henry Kissinger
This isn’t personal. I bet I would have liked O’Connor. But her vote on Bush vs. Gore all but guaranteed the climate collapse.
Whatever his flaws, Al Gore is and has long been a passionate climate activist. This was true more than 20 years ago when he ran for president and won the popular vote by more than half a million votes.
In a 5–4 decision on a weak and questionable basis, and along party lines, the Supreme Court vetoed the voters. They prevented the people’s choice — a passionate climate activist — from taking office. Instead, they put a Texas oil man into the highest office in the land.
The rest is history. Or, as seems increasingly likely, the end of history and the end of a habitable, human-friendly Earth.
O’Connor could have voted differently. Admittedly, even a climate friendly president would have had a difficult time protecting our planet in our oil money-infested political system. But there’s no doubt that Gore would have made a huge effort and our chances would have been substantially better.
Sandra Day O‘Connor prevented our civilization from having even that modest chance. The vote was 5–4. She COULD have swung the result in favor of life. She didn’t.
Henry Kissinger, who lived to 100, was one of many people responsible for the ongoing bloody insanity in Vietnam and elsewhere. He did terrible things for which he should have been held responsible, but was not. However, had someone else been Nixon’s Secretary of State history would not have been all that different. Nixon wasn’t going to ever appoint a peacenik to that office.
But O’Connor single-handedly DID make a historic difference — for the worse. She had a life and death choice for our species and our planet.
She chose death. As did the 4 soulless men who joined her.
Please follow me on Medium.