avatarBrad Yonaka

Summary

The web content describes the historical significance, current state, and cultural impact of the ancient Achaemenid city of Persepolis in Iran, emphasizing its archaeological importance and the relatively recent efforts to preserve and understand it.

Abstract

Persepolis, an ancient Iranian city, stands as a testament to the Achaemenid Empire's grandeur, with its ruins offering insights into a civilization that once ruled a significant portion of the world's population. The site, known locally as Takht-e Jamshid, features impressive architectural remains, including columns, reception halls, and the founders' tombs. Despite its historical significance, Persepolis has not always received the attention it deserves, particularly after the 1979 Iranian Revolution, which shifted focus away from pre-Islamic history. However, efforts to restore its prominence have been made, and it continues to draw visitors, both domestic and international, who are captivated by its art, architecture, and the peaceful integration of diverse cultures under Achaemenid rule. The site's preservation has been aided by the burial of limestone carvings, which protected them from potential destruction over the centuries.

Opinions

  • The author views Persepolis as an underappreciated world heritage site, overshadowed by more famous archaeological sites and the political climate in Iran.
  • The Achaemenid Empire is portrayed as a progressive and inclusive civilization, contrasting with the brutal Assyrians who preceded them.
  • The Achaemenid kings' approach to governance, which allowed for cultural autonomy among subject peoples, is highlighted as a key factor in their successful expansion and longevity.
  • The author expresses a sense of loss regarding the neglect of Persepolis and other archaeological sites in Iran, particularly in the post-revolution era.
  • The presence of tourist infrastructure built by the last Shah of Iran indicates a past attempt to revive interest in Persepolis, though it is now deteriorating.
  • The author suggests that there is potential for a resurgence of interest in the Achaemenid period of Iranian history, with the hope that further discoveries will be made.
  • The site's art and architecture are celebrated for their craftsmanship and symbolic significance, reflecting the cultural foundations laid by the Achaemenids.
  • The author criticizes the name "Alexander the Great," referring to him instead as "Alexander the Bastard" in the Iranian context, due to his role in the destruction of Persepolis.
  • The author's personal experience is woven into the narrative, with anecdotes about their family's visit and their daughter's playful distraction amidst the historical surroundings.

Remnants of Ancient Iran

The ruins of Persepolis

Columns of the Apadema, Persepolis. Photo credit: Brad Yonaka

There are archeological sites worldwide that are known to most of us from a young age. They feature in many stories, and photos of them saturate so many books that their fame proceeds them. A few examples are the Pyramids of Giza, the Colosseum of Rome, the Great Wall of China, Machu Picchu, and Stonehenge.

Then, there are equally important sites that don’t get the same recognition for one reason or another. In the case of the Achaemenid city of Persepolis, it may have to do with how few outsiders get there. My wife, daughter, and I visited it recently as part of a three-week tour of Iran. It is an easy day trip from the city of Shiraz.

Since the revolution of 1979, the pre-Islamic history of Iran has taken a distant back seat for political/religious reasons. Hence, this significant remnant of the ancient world has been left out in the cold, or more literally, out in the desert, to gather dust. Other equally significant archaeological sites in Iran have also suffered this fate.

The inner portion of Persepolis’ entrance gate with guardian lamassus, constructed during the time of Xerxes I. Photo credit: Brad Yonaka

To be fair to its founders, ‘Persepolis’ is only the foreign name given to this place by the ancient Greeks. It translates to “City of the Persians”. Locally, it is known as Takht-e Jamshid, though this name is an even later invention.

What remains of the city today was only the core — living quarters for the royal class, reception halls for diplomats, and the state treasury. Its location, at the base of a mountain already revered for centuries as a sacred home of the god Mithras, is not a coincidence.

The Southern Ramp and Xerxes Gate, with the mountain Kuh-e Mehr behind. This mountain was considered a home of Mithras, worshiped for centuries before the Achaemenid Dynasty came to power. Photo credit: Brad Yonaka

The first construction was under King Darius the Great, who reigned from 522–486 BCE. His son and later king, Xerxes I, added grand structures, as did most of the Achaemenid kings after him. These kings gradually assimilated other empires until their lands stretched from the Danube River to Afghanistan and from the Caspian Sea to Egypt. I saw a statistic claiming that, at its greatest extent, the Achaemenids ruled over 46% of the world’s population.

Though several great civilizations predated them in this region, the Aechemenids are considered the founders of Iranian culture for two reasons. One, their empire was the first to geographically cover all of what is now considered Iran. Two, they laid the cultural, linguistic, and religious foundations that would identify this region and its people for millennia.

A relief sculpture in black limestone showing a procession of soldiers. The soldier on the left has a classic Aechemenid helmet, while that on the right wears a helmet of the Medes (one of the subject kingdoms). Photo credit: Brad Yonaka

From what we understand today of the Achaemenid empire and its quick expansion, peaceful integration held equal is not greater value than conquest by force. Subject people were not excessively taxed or forced to obey Aechemenid traditions. Most groups (like the Medes) did not take up arms and resisted once it was clear that the Aechemenids did not intend to obliterate them. In this respect, the Achaemenids were the antithesis of the Assyrians, a foreign power that ruled over this region before them and who had a reputation for brutality and forced assimilation.

This relatively peaceful system held up for centuries, during which culture and art flourished. The fine craftsmanship of art at Persepolis demonstrates this.

A lion attacking a bull, symbolizing spring (lion) devouring winter (bull), or the cyclical rebirth of the land. Photo credit: Brad Yonaka
A procession of African ambassadors to the Achaemenid court. They bring an okapi, an animal (related to the giraffe) that lives in central Africa. It would have been unknown to the people of Asia. They included it on this wall, meaning it must have made an impression. Photo credit: Brad Yonaka
Soldiers marching up the steps. Photo credit: Brad Yonaka

The first Greek contact with Persepolis occurred when Alexander the Great marched in, looted the treasury, and burned the city (330 BCE). For this, in Iran, he has been given the name Alexander the Bastard.

After Alexander’s conquest, the Achaemenid empire ended, and Persepolis fell into ruin. Little attention was paid to the site until a few hundred years ago. Its history and significance had to be decoupled from the local myths about the ruins that had sprung up in the intervening millennia.

Fortunately, many of the black limestone wall carvings shown above had long since been buried in mud over the centuries from the occasional flood and were preserved. Had they remained exposed, Muslim invaders would likely have defaced or destroyed them. Most stone blocks had already been carted away to build other cities.

The Hall of One Hundred Columns, thought to once house the state treasury, is now mostly destroyed. Photo credit: Brad Yonaka
This double griffin-headed figure is in an area thought to be a workshop where sculptures were being produced. The column holding it up is modern. Photo credit: Brad Yonaka
My daughter eventually got tired of listening to historical discourse and found another child to play with in the gravel. Photo credit: Brad Yonaka

The Aechemenid kings were traditionally buried in rock tombs cut into cliff walls. The earlier tombs are about six kilometers away, but when space ran out, some were buried in the side of the mountain behind Persepolis.

The rock-cut tomb of Artaxerxes III (r. 359–338 BCE), on the hill above Persepolis. His image is shown at the top of the relief, facing right. In front of him is a fire, which has great symbolic power in the Zoroastrian religion. Slightly above this is an eagle with spread wings, symbolizing Ahura Mazda. The last symbol is a moon disk at the top right. Below all of this are figures holding up the floor, each representing one of the tribes who were subjects of the Achaemenids.
An overview of Persepolis from the tomb of Artaxerxes III. Photo credit: Brad Yonaka

The people of Iran have not forgotten the Achaemenids, despite how ancient history is treated by the current government. In the years before the Islamic revolution, Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi ordered the construction of tourist infrastructure to put Persepolis back on the map. Though that infrastructure is now falling into disrepair, the site still receives many visitors, most of them domestic.

To complete the picture of the Achaemenids, we also visited Naqst-e Rostam, about six kilometers across the valley. This is where many early Achaemenid kings were buried in tombs cut into a cliff wall.

Tomb of Artaxerxes II at Naqst-e Rostam. Photo credit: Brad Yonaka

Only the tomb of Darius I (the Great) is known because of a cuneiform inscription that identifies it as such. The kings honored by others (four in all) are inferred based on the evolution of artistic style over time.

Below each of the tombs are later carvings of battle scenes. These were emplaced by the Sassanians, a ruling dynasty that arrived 600 years later. Their many battles with the Roman Empire are epic, and they left evidence of their victories here, on ground already rendered sacrosanct by the Achaemenids.

This double panel, below the tomb of Darius the Great, shows two battle victories of the Sassanian king Bahram II (274–94 CE) over the Romans. Photo credit: Brad Yonaka

There is an unusual building at Naqst-e Rostam that has no presently known function. There are several theories, of course, but at the end of the day no hard evidence.

It was constructed on the land surface as it existed in Achaemenid times, about five meters below where it is today. Hence, the area around it was excavated and fitted with a retaining wall so that it can be viewed in its entirety. When the base was cleared of rubble, writing was found on the blocks that turned out to be from the Sassanians many centuries later. The writings extol the victories of the Sassanid king Ardashir I but say nothing about the structure they are carved into.

The mystery building at Naqst-e Rostam. Photo credit: Brad Yonaka

There is much to be discovered about Persepolis and the Achemenids in general, and someday in Iran, insha’Allah, interest in this period of history will return at scale. I am thankful to have finally seen it.

This is essentially Part 3 of a series about my recent trip to Iran, preceded by:

and

Please check my profile for other travel-related articles at Brad Yonaka, and consider joining Medium to read many great stories using my referral link. I receive a portion of your subscription fee.

Iran
Archaeology
Travel Writing
Ancient History
Personal Experience
Recommended from ReadMedium