avatarRené Junge

Summary

The provided web content discusses the controversial role of prologues in literature, weighing their potential benefits and common pitfalls.

Abstract

The article "Prologue yes or no?" delves into the debate surrounding the use of prologues in novels, providing a concise overview of their purpose and common misconceptions. A prologue serves as a precursor to the main narrative, offering essential background information that is central to understanding the story. While some readers find prologues unnecessary, a well-crafted prologue can effectively set the stage for the plot, especially in genres like science fiction and fantasy. The article emphasizes that a prologue should be integral to the core narrative and not a mere dumping ground for extraneous details or authorial research. It also cautions against using prologues as a crutch for weak storytelling, suggesting that most stories would be better without them. The author advises that if a prologue does not add significant value to the story, it is best to omit it and focus on crafting a compelling narrative from the outset.

Opinions

  • Prologues are often perceived as superfluous by readers, but they can be valuable when done correctly.
  • A prologue should directly impact the main plot and not serve as a vehicle for trivial or unrelated information.
  • The use of a prologue to explain the world or backstory is particularly relevant in speculative fiction genres.
  • A prologue must be engaging, as it is the reader's first introduction to the story.
  • Forewords are distinct from prologues and are generally unnecessary, especially when written by the author.
  • Many authors mistakenly use prologues to compensate for narrative shortcomings rather than enhancing the story.
  • The majority of stories do not require a prologue, and their inclusion often detracts from the overall narrative.
  • A prologue should not be used to artificially create suspense or to make up for a slow start to the main story.
  • Detailed character studies and extensive historical background are usually not appropriate content for a prologue.
  • The decision to include a prologue should be based on its necessity to the story and its ability to provide genuine added value.

Prologue yes or no?

Some hate them, others can’t get along without them — prologues. These often superfluous actions before the actual action are a nuisance for many readers. But it doesn’t have to be that way.

Photo by Mathew Schwartz on Unsplash

Whole books have been written about the subject of the prologue, but basically, the most important things can be said very briefly. That is precisely what this article does. Here is a quick overview of the most essential pros and cons on the subject of prologues.

What is a prologue?

In a novel, a prologue is a text that precedes the first chapter. It serves to give the reader the information he needs to understand the main story.

Sometimes, for example, it is impractical to jump back in the middle of the main text to a distant event that the reader must know to understand the further course of the story. Long retrospects inhibit the flow of reading and tear the reader out of the actual story.

Such central events, which take place before the beginning of the main story, can be accommodated in a prologue.

In science fiction or fantasy novels, a prologue can also help explain the world in which the story takes place to the reader before he or she even gets into the story.

A good example would be a story set in a post-apocalyptic world. If the reader needs to know what ruined this world so much, then the prologue is the place for it.

Show the all-destructive comet impact, the outbreak of the zombie epidemic or the attack of the aliens under whose yoke the characters of your main story must live for centuries.

Because the prologue is the first thing the reader sees, it must, of course, be written at least as excitingly as the main text. So the prologue has the task of drawing the reader into the story before it has even begun.

It is essential that the prologue does not refer to any side aspect of the actual story, but directly affects its core. To describe the development of a minor character in a prologue is, for example, entirely superfluous.

What is not a prologue?

The most important thing at the beginning: A prologue is not a foreword. Your novel doesn’t need a foreword — never. If you are an important and world-famous writer, you can deviate from this rule, but then the preface is usually written by another, equally important writer, and not yourself.

But even then, a foreword is not a prologue. Never write the word prologue over a foreword. Do not write a foreword at all.

But now to the prologue:

I often see, especially with inexperienced authors, that the prologue serves as a garbage dump for everything that the author found out during his research on the book, but which he could not use in the actual story.

If the prologue has nothing to do with the main plot, it’s not a prologue, it’s an unnecessary appendage.

If the prologue is misused as an infodump, it is not a prologue, but a feeble attempt to compensate for narrative incompetence.

As a rule, the only thing that belongs in a prologue is what has to be told and cannot be made understandable in the story by carefully dosed flashbacks, dialogues, or inner monologues.

A prologue is not there to explain the story to the reader in advance.

The story must explain itself. If it does not, it is not well written.

Much of what the author knows, the reader doesn’t need to know in advance. Some authors create long character studies of all their characters before they start writing. As a writer, it can often be useful to know that in his childhood, the hero had a formative experience that made him the person he is today.

For the reader, however, such information is usually wholly superfluous. Therefore, such information does not have to be squeezed into a prologue.

Nor do they have to tell the story in advance how the technology that appears in your space epic has evolved over the centuries (don’t laugh — it’s all been done before).

So should I write a prologue or not?

I claim that in more than ninety percent of cases, the answer will clearly be no.

Most of the prologue stories I read would have done without it. I would even say that these stories would have been even better without the prologue.

Why do so many authors write prologues anyway? I think to start with a pop effect. So a particularly brutal murder at the very beginning can, of course, draw readers into the story.

After the prologue, however, it often turns out that the story is very calm for a few chapters, until at some point, in the fourth chapter, something happens that is as gripping as the murder from the prologue.

So if you’re wondering how to spruce up your somewhat lengthy story with the most spectacular prologue possible, you’d better work on your story.

But if your story is one of the few in which a prologue can be used meaningfully because it offers added value, then write the prologue.

Just be aware of why you need it and what it does for your story.

Read also:

do you want more of this?

Receive weekly email and don’t miss any of my articles.

suscribe here http://bit.ly/ReneJunge

Writing
Writing Tips
Writers On Writing
Storytelling
Books
Recommended from ReadMedium