Producers: Glencore Offers Full Ownership Bid for Copper-Nickel Mining Project in Minnesota of USA
Glencore is a beast in the business of global commodities — and that’s why I have covered them extensively in the publication Areas & Producers.
The Swiss-based trader and producer is historically known for its massive presence in the emerging markets space. But now they are pushing hard into North America, as this latest full ownership bid of PolyMet Mining illustrates to a tee.
The ownership bid for this St. Paul-based mining company is about a copper-nickel mine in Northern Minnesota located near to Babbit. According to media reports, Glencore already owns 82% of the company and has made an offer of $71 million to take a 100% ownership of the company. AP News
This push is also related to Glencore’s interest in Teck Resources, a reputable Canadian coal mining company, of which PolyMet controls a 50% share as a joint-venture (JV) partner. MarketWatch
For full details on Glencore’s deal with PolyMet and how it relates to the dynamic of Teck Resources, read the piece by MarketWatch in the link above.
What I would like to point attention to is the processing plant associated with this copper-nickel mine in Hoyt Lakes, Minnesota.
This is how natural resources become commodities; and subsequently global commodities. When natural resources are dug out of the ground, regardless of the mining method, they are destined to be processed into a commodity which can be sold on a global commodities market or trade exchange. When they’re sold like this, they are called global commodities.
A piece written by Mike Hughlett of the Star Tribune discusses the effects that the surging demand for global commodities are having on this controversial mining project in Minnesota.
While advocates of the Iron Range economic development welcome this scenario, other stakeholder of this community do not accept the proposals based on environmental concerns. It’s because of the processing of these critical metals — copper and nickel — that inevitably create consequential amounts of toxic waste as a byproduct of metals processing.
Attorney for the environmental group WaterLegacy Paula Maccabee told Star Tribune:
“Minnesota needs to look carefully whether we want to put our mineral resources and water resources in the hands of a notorious multinational corporation.”
The context around this multinational corporation, Glencore, not only involves the environmental impact that this company is known for leaving behind in the developing world, but also for the widespread corruption that its global operations have allowed for the sake of boosting profits in areas stretching from Brazil to the Democractic Republic of Congo (DRC).
It caused the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) and the United Kingdom Special Fraud Office (SFO) to unleash a global corruption case against Glencore…
Areas: Glencore’s Oil Market Manipulation and Bribery Case in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC)
On 24 May 2022, Glencore International A.G. (herein referred to as “Glencore”) pled guilty to the United States Department of Justice’s (DOJ) claims that the Swiss mining and commodites trading company violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and engaged in a commodity price manipulation scheme while the company was being run by former CEO Ivan Glasberg.
This was part of a multi-government effort from the United States, United Kingdom and Brazil — resulting in Glencore setting aside $1.5 billion for potential settlements over the corruption and bribery investigations into their oil trading schemes.
In the plea agreement, Glencore was forced to pay more than $428 million in criminal fines and more than $272 million of criminal forfeiture and disgorgement. By accepting a independent compliance monitor for three years, the DOJ has agreed to credit around $256 million of the payments made by Glencore to assist the DOJ in related investigations of other domestic and foreign perpetrators.
According to U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland: “This represents the Justice Department’s largest criminal enforcement action to date for a commodity price manipulation conspiracy in oil markets. ”
In a separate case initiated by the Commodity Future Trading Commission (CFTC) there were charges of manipulative and deceptive conduct brought against three entities: Glencore International A.G. (Switzerland), Glencore Ltd. (New York), and Chemoil Corporation (New York).
This case was investigated for actions committed by Glencore and its subsidiaries due to oil price manipulation and foreign corruption in the United States and global oil markets from 2007–2018. These actions included manipulation or attempted manipulation of four S&P Globl Platts physical oil benchmarks and related futures and swaps in the United States — all for the purpose of profiting from market trades that exclusively benefitted Glencore executives and traders.
The CFTC’s order forces Glencore to pay $1.186 billion as a settlement for its manipulative and fradulent conduct in the global oil markets. According to CFTC Chairman Rostin Behnam, Glencore’s actions to manipulate and decieve traders and markets has caused a direct impact on consumers, alluding to how Glencore’s oil market manipulation scheme “can drive up the cost Americans pay at the pump or to heat their homes.”
It was noted in the CFTC’s order that there was direct intent by Glencore personnel to manipulate the price of fuel oil products in interstate commerce as well as create artifical prices so that Glencore’s trading positions could profit further from volatile oil markets.
In connection to the DOJ’s foreign bribery and corruption case, the CFTC also launched an investigation into Glencore’s fraud and corrupt payments to employees and agents of state-owned entities (SOEs) in Brazil, Cameroon, Nigeria and Venezuela. In addition, there were charges of misappropriation of confidential information from certain SOEs in Mexico.
Read the full legal analysis here: Glencore’s Oil Market Manipulation and Bribery Case Is On The Wild Side.
Producers: Glencore Seeks Expansion to Production at Antapaccay Mine in Peru
It was reported by Reuters that Swiss commodities and mining giant Glencore is seeking to expand production capacity at its Anatapaccay copper mine in Peru.
At the same time, Andy Home of Reuters Commodities published a column about how the global copper stocks are signaling weak pricing trends in the short-term outlook of commodities markets, especially copper and oil.
Both of these reports reveal how changes to the global commodities markets are affecting global mining projects, as evidenced the strategies of Glencore, BHP Group, Rio Tinto, and others, to shape the momentum for so-called future-facing commodities.
The future-facing commodities are copper, nickel and potash.
What all three of these future facing commodities have in common are their connections to the Energy Transition, with a growing demand for Clean Energy Technologies and Electric Vehicles (EVs).
Meanwhile for Glencore the company has been laser-focused on its energy trading, with thermal coal at the heart of a controversial takeover bid of Teck Resources.
As one of the world’s largest miners and commodities traders, the company’s exposure to thermal coal, crude oil and critical metals such as cobalt and zinc, has brought Glencore’s profit margins to exceedingly new highs.
In 2022, Glencore had a historical year in profits from the mining and trading of global commodities, which have been exacerbated by the ongoing Russia-Ukraine Conflict. Moreover, since Glencore is one of the only countries that still has a full-fledged coal business, it has given the company extreme flexibility to give investors more returns through corporate buybacks and dividends.
At the same, headwinds for Glencore are in the form of evnironmental activitis and indigenous groups teaming up in opposition to global mining projects being planned by miners and governments to spur economic activity and commit to Net-Zero Emissions 2050 during what has been called a new era for Environment, Social, Governance (ESG) and global mining projects.
For a wide variety of content on global mining updates and ESG trends, follow the publication Areas & Producers.




