Summary

The article discusses the risks and legal issues associated with using Creative Commons images, including cases of stolen images, copyright trolling, and improper attribution, which have led to costly lawsuits and fines for unsuspecting users.

Abstract

The web content highlights a growing concern among content creators regarding the use of Creative Commons licensed images. It explains how individuals and businesses have faced significant financial penalties for inadvertently using images that were either stolen or improperly licensed as Creative Commons. The article underscores the potential for copyright trolling, where images are deliberately mislabeled with Creative Commons licenses to trap users. It also emphasizes the importance of adhering to the specific terms of Creative Commons licenses, such as proper attribution and restrictions on commercial use, to avoid legal action. The author, having experienced a substantial fine for image licensing issues, advocates for using one's own photographs or being extremely vigilant when sourcing images to prevent costly legal battles.

Opinions

The author is deeply concerned about the misuse of Creative Commons images, having personally faced a hefty fine for image licensing infringement.
There is a strong opinion against copyright trolling, where individuals maliciously upload images with incorrect Creative Commons licenses to entrap users.
The author believes that even when users win copyright infringement cases, the legal costs and time spent can be prohibitive, suggesting that paying for image licenses might be more cost-effective.
The article suggests that some photographers are increasingly turning to litigation as a primary source of income, rather than selling licenses for their work.
The author plans to mitigate risks by primarily using their own photographs for future projects and recommends others do the same, especially when running publications or blogs that frequently use images.
Despite the risks, the author acknowledges that many people have used Creative Commons images without issue, provided they are properly credited, but emphasizes the need for caution and due diligence.

People are Being Sued for Using Creative Commons Images

And it’s costing them thousands

Anyone who’s been paying attention to my occasional ranting about photography copyright infringement, might have noticed I’m keen to stay within the law on image licencing and I’m perhaps a little paranoid about it. This is mostly because I had to pay a £1000 fine once in relation to a colleague’s lax approach to picture licencing at work.

While you might think that using a Creative Commons image leaves you in the clear, it’s come to my attention recently that people are being sued for using Creative Commons images — and it’s not always because they’ve made a mistake.

Theft

In some cases, it’s simply because the image was stolen and the person who uploaded it to the Creative Commons website was not the copyright holder and was not authorised to do so. Essentially, it’s theft.

Kelley Keller writing for Small Biz Trends explains this well...

“A big problem with Creative Commons licenses is the fact that anyone can apply them to any work. For example, many of the Creative Commons licensed images on Flickr, Google, and sites that aggregate images weren’t uploaded by the owners of the images. The Creative Commons licenses applied by the people who uploaded the images (but don’t own them) are completely invalid! If you use one of these improperly licensed images, you very well might get caught and find yourself on the losing end of an expensive copyright infringement lawsuit.”

Copyright trolling

Then there’s the issue of copyright trolling where people deliberately upload an image that isn’t covered by the CC licence terms. Or they impose licence conditions that they know are likely to be breached.

Then, when someone uses the unlicensed image, or breaches the terms of use, they issue a legal demand for payment due to copyright infringement.

For example, did you know that the Unsplash CC licence does not include the right to use: images of logos, artwork, or ‘People’s images if they are recognizable in the Photos’? Legal demands have been issued over this.

Here’s an example of that in action: “Photographer faces legal action after using a photo he downloaded from Unsplash”.

Even if you win, you lose

There’s also a fascinating story here of one case that went to court amid accusations of improper attribution and failure to comply with the ShareALike conditions. The defendant who’d downloaded the image won. BUT they spent 14 months tied up in litigation and never recouped their legal costs. The story concludes: “Sometimes a Paid-For License Is Less Expensive Than a Free License.”

Improper attribution can cost thousands!

Here’s another example, quoted by AGT Lawyers, where the person who downloaded the image “did not fully comply with the attribution requirements of the Creative Commons license”. They say fines up to $150,000 for infringement may be levied on guilty parties.

AGT Lawyers say: “I discovered that my friend was an unwitting victim of a copyright holder who preys on people who use his images under Creative Commons licenses but who do not understand or appreciate the details, terms and conditions of the Creative Commons license agreements”.

Failure to credit the photographer is a common mistake, as in this example of a festival that got sued for failure to attribute the photographer. They eventually reached a legal settlement.

These lawsuits are hugely lucrative!

Some photographers are finding law suits for copyright infringement so lucrative that it’s a major source of their income, which beats selling licences to use the photos. Check out this story about a photographer who went into ‘serial copyright litigation’, with about 50 lawsuits.

The court says “the principal way that Philpot appears to make money from his photography is settlement agreements in copyright lawsuits.” Source

In other cases, people have been sued for using an image for financial gain when the licence is either restricted by ShareALike or doesn’t allow commercial use.

I’ll be using my own photos going forward

Photos used on my blogs are all attributed, but there’s no way of telling when a CC photograph has been stolen and uploaded without permission, so I’ll be replacing what I can with my own photos.

I’ve also used Unsplash images of people and logos in the past… a situation I plan to fix very quickly.

I’ll mostly use my own pictures going forward and request that people contributing to my publication do the same.

Read more on the risks and problems here: https://smallbiztrends.com/2015/03/using-creative-commons.html

END NOTE — to the worried: It is perhaps worth adding that thousands of people have used creative commons images without any problems in the past, and that if you credit them properly, you’d have to be unlucky for any issues to arise. I personally have used them on a handful of book covers for 10 years, with no problems. But as I’m using a lot more images on my blogs and I’m also running a publication now, this issue was of interest and concern to me.