avatarMaarten van Doorn

Summary

The article argues that confidence is not a quick fix and cannot be achieved solely through affirmations, emphasizing the importance of experience and skill development for genuine self-assurance.

Abstract

The article "No, You Don’t Need To Be Confident All The Time — And Why You Shouldn’t Even Try" challenges the notion that confidence can be easily attained through simple methods like affirmations. It suggests that while quick fixes may work for physical habits, mental habits, particularly confidence, require more than just positive self-talk. The author, Maarten van Doorn, points out that confidence built on affirmations alone is superficial and can lead to impostor syndrome when faced with high-pressure situations. True confidence, according to the article, is earned through repeated success and experience, not through self-deception. The piece also distinguishes between 'verbal' confidence, which is what people say about themselves, and 'behavioral' confidence, which is reflected in actions and is based on actual achievements. The author concludes that courage, not confidence, is what one needs to take the first step towards learning and improving, and that confidence is a byproduct of performance, not a prerequisite.

Opinions

  • The author believes that the strategy of using affirmations to build confidence is problematic and ineffective, especially in high-stakes situations.
  • It is suggested that there is a disconnect between what people tell themselves through affirmations and what they truly believe, which can lead to feelings of being a fraud, or impostor syndrome.
  • The article posits that confidence should be proportional to one's track record and that it is rational to lack confidence when trying something new.
  • The author asserts that confidence is the result of high performance, not the cause, and that courage is more important than confidence when initiating new endeavors.
  • Maarten van Doorn implies a critique of self-help gurus who promote quick-fix mental strategies, advocating instead for a more grounded approach to building self-reliance and confidence.
Source

No, You Don’t Need To Be Confident All The Time — And Why You Shouldn’t Even Try

Many things lend themselves to quick fixes. People who deny that — “It just can’t be that easy!” — are uninformed or afraid to take responsibility for their lives.

Headspace helps us meditate, Runkeeper motivates us to exercise, QualityTime tracks our screen time and various food-track apps monitor our calorie intake. For productivity, start your day ‘unplugged’ with a cold shower and a glass of water, light breakfast, black coffee, and deep work. And so on.

For physical habits, these straightforward strategies about what (not) to do work. In such domains, good techniques give you 80% of the benefits for 20% of the toil.

As Mark Manson observes, “There seems to be a bias in the human circuitry that … overestimates the effort required to take on … small goals.”

It’s the same bias causes people to underestimate what it takes to accomplish big goals.

Affirmations as a habit

Many self-help gurus advocate similar quick fixes for mental habits. That’s problematic.

The most famous trick in the bag is that of ‘affirmations’. According to the first hit on Google:

“Affirmations are simple messages. Repeated over-and-over, they begin to worm their way into your mind. Slowly changing both your thinking and your reality.”

Tellingly, this strategy is advocated by a website called DevelopGoodHabits.

The idea is, when you say something to yourself often enough — “I’m a goddamit fa-bu-lous public speaker!” — the message will trickle down and your beliefs about your presentation skills will actually change, without any miserable public speaking experiences whatsoever. It’s all in the head!

“Sounds good,” I thought, so during my life, I’ve affirmated the shit out of myself. Under the shower, cycling and whenever, I’d fill empty moments by uttering to myself: “You can do it! You can do it! You’re the best!”

Just writing that makes me squirm.

Here’s the thing. Perhaps beliefs about yourself that were formed using this method can withstand run-off-the-mill, low-pressure tests. But when push comes to shove, in high-pressure, high-performance situations, when you’re up for that first conference talk, you see through the mirage. The house of cards collapses.

The problem is that the belief doesn’t trickle down. Standing in front of a mirror and doing affirmations is easy, and it’s not enough. For true confidence, there’s no quick fix. You can’t skip the embarrassments and failures.

Affirmations are a coping mechanism, perhaps an instigator, but not a confidence builder.

Two types of confidence

There’s a difference between, under the shower, thinking I’m OK at something, on the one hand, and genuinely believing so, on the other hand. It’s a lack of this fundamental self-reliance that shines through in the heated moments.

‘Verbal’ and ‘behavioral’ confidence aren’t the same thing. The problem with affirmations is that they drive a wedge between what you tell yourself and what you believe in your core.

Repeated success is the only way for confidence to trickle down. Otherwise the belief is baseless, fake. And deep down, you know it is.

Because your heart knows there’s something amiss — it senses the discrepancy — this belief-forming method is a one-way ticket to the Impostor syndrome: a persistent internalized fear of being exposed as a “fraud”. I wonder whether there’s a connection between the rise of that cognitive condition and the popularity of affirmations.

Confidence must be earned. Not created.

Confidence is overrated

Is it just me, or are most (over)confident people kind of annoying?

To lack confidence at the outset seems rational to me. Instead of convincing yourself that “You can do it!”, it’s better to be honest with yourself: “I don’t how I’ll do — I’m new at this.” Contrary to what people tell you, it’s totally OK to feel that way.

That you’re not fully confident, doesn’t mean you have a lack of confidence. Rather than as high as possible, your confidence level ought to be realistic: proportional to your track record.

Trust yourself because you’ve seen yourself in action, not because you’ve talked yourself into it. Words are too thin of a foundation.

“Confidence isn’t what produces high performance. But rather, high performance is what produces confidence.” — Benjamin Hardy

Confidence doesn’t turn you into an overnight superhero. If your skills don’t match up, you can be as self-assured as you like, to no avail. It will make you look stupid — not smart.

Confidence is not something you begin with, but something that comes gradually with repeated attempts at doing something successfully, the byproduct of prior performance. It comes after, not before.

To take that first step, you need courage. That’s much more important than confidence.

There’s more to that

If you’re interested in debunking more cultural myths, please subscribe to my personal blog. You’ll get a weekly dose of similarly mind-expanding ideas.

Self Improvement
Psychology
Culture
Life Lessons
Mental Health
Recommended from ReadMedium