avatarJames Patrick Nelson

Summary

The article reflects on the portrayal of sexually submissive men in 90s and early 2000s films, highlighting the problematic nature of these depictions and their impact on viewers, particularly queer youth.

Abstract

The piece delves into the cultural and personal implications of how Hollywood has historically depicted sexually submissive men, often as the brunt of jokes or in humiliating contexts. It uses specific examples from movies like "The Rage: Carrie 2" and "Road Trip" to illustrate how these scenes, while arousing for some, were steeped in misogyny, transphobia, and queerphobia. The author, now an adult, grapples with the dissonance between the initial attraction to these scenes and the understanding of their problematic undertones. The article advocates for more affirming and consensual representations of sexual submission, particularly for queer audiences, and acknowledges the progress made in recent years with more nuanced and empowering portrayals in film and television.

Opinions

  • The author believes that past depictions of male sexual submission in films were troubling and inappropriate, often reinforcing harmful stereotypes and stigmas.
  • There is a recognition that the cultural narrative around queer desire has historically been framed as wrong, contributing to a sense of shame and confusion among queer viewers.
  • The article suggests that filmmakers of the era rarely considered queer audiences and that the portrayal of homoerotic content was typically for comedic effect at the expense of queer individuals.
  • The author points out the absence of empowering, consensual representations of sexually submissive males in widely-released movies of the 90s and 200

We Were All — Pun Intended — the Butt of the Joke

Empowering the Sexually Submissive Man in the Movies

Stock Photo by Bruno Curly from Pexels

On his fantastic podcast “Films to be Buried With,” Emmy-winning “Ted Lasso” star Brette Goldstein interviews actors, directors, and comedians about the films that mean the most to them. His question “What’s the sexiest film you’ve ever seen?” has a sub-category:

“Troubling Boners, Worrying Wide-Ons: a film you found arousing that you weren’t sure you should.”

Reasonably enough, most guests don’t take it seriously. The most common answer is Jessica Rabbit. But I always wonder “Where does the ‘trouble’ reside?” Is it with me, or the movie… or the movie-making system?

My top contender for the “troubling boner” is the 1999 teen-horror movie “The Rage: Carrie 2,” a belated sequel to the film classic “Carrie”. Most of the film is so horrendous, I’ve never re-watched it. But when the DVD first came out when I was 13-years-old, I watched one scene over and over.

Scene from “The Rage: Carrie 2”. (YouTube screenshot)

The bully is talking in the back of football practice, until the coach gets in his face, shouting “On your feet, turn around, drop your trow, shorts and all.” Reluctantly, the young man obeys, turning around, unbuttoning his pants and pulling them down. The camera cuts to a tight profile of his bubble-butt, and the coach kneeling to look at it.

“How do I reckon with the fact that something so cringey used to turn me on?”

Revisiting this scene as an adult, I realized the power imbalance is clearly inappropriate. And the coach’s line of dialogue — “After that half-assed block, I just wanted to check and see if maybe you had any tampon strings hanging between your legs” — is grossly misogynist (implying women aren’t good at football) and transphobic (implying men can’t use tampons).

But as a kid, all I saw was a man telling another man, “Turn around, show me your ass.” I was a horny teenager, starving for this kind of dynamic.

And it wasn’t just the modest nudity. What made me so hot-and-bothered was that it seemed like this gorgeous young man was yielding, being submissive, being dominated by another man who wanted to see his ass.

But now that I’m old enough to know the difference between dominance and humiliation, how do I reckon with the fact that something so cringey used to turn me on?

American Pie” screenshot

“I wonder what a more healthy and affirming version of that content would have even looked like in those days?”

Millennials across the sexuality spectrum are looking back with a shudder at movies from our childhood that haven’t aged well. Comedy franchises like “Police Academy,” “Revenge of the Nerds,” and “American Pie,” solicited laughter and titillation from scenes of blatant sexual assault. And now we’re asking ourselves, “Why on earth did I think that was okay?”

But as a queer person, I’m always combatting the cultural narrative that my sexual desire is wrong, so I’m trying not to conflate ‘90s-retrospective guilt with the residual shame a queerphobic society has instilled in me.

So again, the important question is — Where does the “trouble” reside?

When it comes to the misogyny in “The Rage,” I can blame the filmmakers for thinking that was ever acceptable to begin with. As for what transfixed me — a hot young man yielding his naked body… I wonder what a more healthy and affirming version of that content would have even looked like in those days?

“Big-budget movies only showed us a sexually submissive man if he was — pardon the expression — the butt-of-the-joke.”

Hard as I try, I can’t think of a single widely-released movie from the 90’s or 2000’s that empowered a sexually submissive male. Any time a man was naked or in a sexual situation where his butt was the focus of attention, or where he was in some way submissive or vulnerable, it was hardly ever consensual. It was almost always a scene of humiliation or abuse, or at the very least, designed to make a heterosexual audience laugh.

Scene from “Road Trip” (YouTube screenshot)

Another strong contender for my troubling boner is the sperm bank scene in “Road Trip,” in which Seann William Scott from “American Pie” tries to get a nurse to give him a handjob. Instead, she asks him to turn around and drop his pants, and then she lubes up her fingers and milks his prostate, inducing a colossal anal orgasm.

Now, this scene is not troubling in the same way as “The Rage,” because the character consents and feels pleasure. But it’s still another example of male sexual submission being treated as a joke. The film is a a gross-out comedy, the actor’s orgasm is absurdly over-the-top, and the film’s perspective is: “Look at this dude getting fingered in the butt! Hysterical, right?

It probably never occurred to the filmmakers that I’d be sitting there in the theater, at 14-years-old, feeling insanely turned on. As an adult gay man, prostate orgasms are one of the great joys of my life, and this was the first time I got to see one on film.

And everyone around me was laughing.

Stock Photo by Kool Shooters on Pexels

This is where the trouble resides.

Filmmakers of that era rarely had queer audiences in mind. Whether the character drops his pants willingly or unwilling, to make the characters laugh or the audience laugh, big-budget movies only showed us a sexually submissive man if he was — pardon the expression — the butt-of-the-joke.

When homoerotic content is presented solely in scenes of ridicule, humiliation, or abuse, it not only makes a queer-pubescent viewer (and their nostalgic older self) ashamed of their arousal, it reinforces the toxic stigma queer people have been fighting all our lives — that our sexual expression is something the rest of the world should either mock or fear.

Top Left to Right: Queer as Folk, The Man with the Answers, And Then We Danced, It’s A Sin. Bottom Left to Right: A Moment in the Reeds, End of the Century, Sorry Angel.

Thankfully, we’re making progress. There is a lot more queer visibility onscreen nowadays, and queer audiences can find a lot more healthy, canonical expressions of sexual desire. And we’re finally seeing stories (like Goldstein’s “Ted Lasso”) where men of all sexualities are allowed to be vulnerable, and to find empowerment in yielding their power to others.

But still, I can only imagine how meaningful it would have been, for the affirmation of queer youth, and the emotional edification of young men in general, if we all got to see a movie in the late-90’s where the heroic male protagonist was an unapologetic power-bottom.

Gosh that would have been good.

Sign up for Sexography’s newsletter here, so you don’t miss a beat from our publication. We won’t bombard you with emails. We promise.

Support us on Patreon

Don’t forget, we have a Patreon where you can support us, as well. Readers can support us for as little as $1 per month, and it really helps us keep things running. It really helps us out to bring you the best content we possibly can.

We still have an official Sexography website in the works. Each donation helps us get closer to that goal.

Click here to become a Patreon supporter.

LGBTQ
Movies
Sex
Film
Gay
Recommended from ReadMedium