avatarBarack Obama

Summary

Former President Barack Obama and Michelle Obama have expressed deep concern over the potential overturning of Roe v. Wade by the Supreme Court, emphasizing the threat to personal freedoms and the disproportionate impact on women without the means to seek abortion services elsewhere.

Abstract

The Obamas' statement reflects a profound worry for the future of reproductive rights in America following a leaked draft Supreme Court decision that could overturn Roe v. Wade. They argue that this decision would not only reverse nearly five decades of legal precedent but also subject the deeply personal choice of terminating a pregnancy to political control. The Obamas highlight the importance of the Fourteenth Amendment in ensuring a private sphere free from state intervention, which includes decisions about sexual partners, marriage, contraception, and childbearing. They point out that while freedoms are not absolute, the draft decision fails to balance interests and instead strips away constitutionally recognized rights over one's body. The potential consequences of this decision are far-reaching, threatening to undermine the rights of all individuals in a free society and likely increasing the risks for women seeking illegal abortions, especially those with limited resources. The Obamas call for solidarity and action, urging Americans to support campaigns, participate in protests, and vote for officials who will protect these rights.

Opinions

  • The overturning of Roe v. Wade would be a significant setback for personal freedoms and women's rights, removing a constitutional protection that has been in place for almost 50 years.
  • The decision to terminate a pregnancy is deeply personal and should not be left to the whims of politicians or ideologues.
  • The Fourteenth Amendment provides a constitutional basis for a private sphere where individuals can make personal decisions without government intrusion.
  • While society has an interest in protecting children and individuals from harm, the draft decision does not seek to balance these interests with personal autonomy.
  • The consequences of overturning Roe v. Wade would likely lead to increased inequality, as women with means could travel to access legal abortions, while others might resort to unsafe, illegal procedures.
  • The Obamas emphasize that the courts play a crucial role in protecting rights and that the composition of these courts is directly influenced by elections, hence the importance of voting.
  • They call for collective action, including protesting, volunteering, and urging Congress to codify Roe v. Wade into law to safeguard reproductive rights.

My Statement with Michelle on the Draft Supreme Court Decision to Overturn Roe v. Wade

Getty Images

Today, millions of Americans woke up fearing that their essential freedoms under the Constitution were at risk.

If the Supreme Court ultimately decides to overturn the landmark case of Roe v. Wade, then it will not only reverse nearly 50 years of precedent — it will relegate the most intensely personal decision someone can make to the whims of politicians and ideologues.

Few, if any, women make the decision to terminate a pregnancy casually — and people of goodwill, across the political spectrum, can hold different views on the subject. But what Roe recognized is that the freedom enshrined in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution requires all of us to enjoy a sphere of our lives that isn’t subject to meddling from the state — a sphere that includes personal decisions involving who we sleep with, who we marry, whether or not to use contraception, and whether or not to bear children.

As the court has previously determined, our freedoms are not unlimited — society has a compelling interest in other circumstances, for example, in protecting children from abuse or people from self-harm — and the framework constructed by Roe and subsequent Court decisions allowed legislatures to impose greater restrictions on abortion later in pregnancy. But this draft decision doesn’t seek to balance these interests. Instead, it simply forces folks to give up any constitutionally recognized interest in what happens to their body once they get pregnant. Under the Court’s logic, state legislatures could dictate that women carry every pregnancy to term, no matter how early it is and no matter what circumstances led to it — even rape or incest.

The consequences of this decision would be a blow not just to women, but to all of us who believe that in a free society, there are limits to how much the government can encroach on our personal lives. And this decision is unlikely to significantly reduce abortions, which have been steadily going down over the past several decades thanks in large part to better access to contraception and education. Instead, as we’ve already begun to see in states with restrictive abortion laws, those women with means would travel to states where abortion remains legal and safe. Meanwhile, those without enough money or access to transportation or ability to take off from school or work would face the same circumstances most women faced before Roe, desperately seeking out illegal abortions that inevitably pose grave risks to their health, their future ability to bear children, and sometimes their lives.

That’s a result none of us should want. But it should serve as a powerful reminder of the central role the courts play in protecting our rights — and of the fact that elections have consequences.

A clear majority of Americans support Roe. Yet we recognize that while many are angry and frustrated by this report, some of those who support Roe may feel helpless and instinctively turn back to their work, or families, or daily tasks — telling themselves that because this outcome may have been predictable, there’s nothing any of us can do.

If that’s you, we ask you to think about the college student waking up after her date forced her into unprotected sex. Think about the couple that tried to have children for years, who are without any options when faced with the tragic reality of an unviable pregnancy. Think of any of the hundreds of thousands of women each year who deserve the dignity and freedom of making a decision that is right for their bodies and their circumstances.

You might be one of those people. Or you might know some of them by name. If you don’t, ask yourself if you know everyone’s whole story.

But we’re not asking you to just think about these people. We’re asking you to join with the activists who’ve been sounding the alarm on this issue for years — and act. Stand with them at a local protest. Volunteer with them on a campaign. Join with them in urging Congress to codify Roe into law. And vote alongside them on or before November 8 and in every other election. Because in the end, if we want judges who will protect all, and not just some, of our rights, then we’ve got to elect officials committed to doing the same.

Recommended from ReadMedium