avatarMarcus aka Gregory Maidman

Free AI web copilot to create summaries, insights and extended knowledge, download it at here

974

Abstract

d="03a6">In <i>The Rise of the Divine Mother, <a href="undefined">Patrick Paul Garlinger</a> writes: “</i>What the Divine Mother really stands for is our innate relationship to Source.” I agree with this statement, which correlates to Krunal Dangar’s view that creation, intuition, and empathy spring from the Divine Feminine. Garlinger goes on to state:</p><blockquote id="ed40"><p>By contrast, the Divine Father or Masculine is the expression of Source through infinite forms. If the Divine Feminine is the Source from which we all spring, the Divine Masculine is the infinite variety and multiplicity of forms that we can take as extensions of that Source. The fact that human beings, and all other life forms, can take infinite forms, shapes, and permutations is life expanding and proliferating. Diversity of form is the Divine Masculine principle.</p></blockquote><p id="de05">This is a nice theoretical attempt to tie things in a nice yellow bow without bruising the m

Options

ale ego. Does it withstand scrutiny? Human beings take infinite form? I doubt there are even an infinite amount of DNA sequences of our 30 million genes that can produce a viable human, although it is certainly such a huge number as to make the theory acceptable to many. (614 zeros is a ridiculously huge number). But when you consider how alike each of many of the extant 7 billion are, it starts to remind me of the claims of MLM companies that are taken as true because they look true and often tell a nice story.</p><p id="beac">The more likely construct and men would probably chest-bump over it, is that divine feminine somehow became the term for soul while divine masculine became the term for human; and the not-so-nice story is that for millennia souls have been losing the battle, which doesn’t surprise me as most would find life in Heaven boring, and that may be why so many souls agree to endure ever more pain life cycle after life cycle.</p></article></body>

My Reaction to Two Recent Pieces on the Concepts of Divine Feminine and Divine Masculine

File ID: 23652875 by lightsource licensed from depositphotos.com

Krunal Dangar writes in Reverence for the Divine Feminine:

Within all of us, resides two sacred energies — the divine feminine and the divine masculine. The feminine expresses herself in creation, intuition, empathy, and sensuality while action, power, logic, and focus are the expressions of the masculine. When in harmony with each other, they create a numinous state of being that is ethereal.

In The Rise of the Divine Mother, Patrick Paul Garlinger writes: “What the Divine Mother really stands for is our innate relationship to Source.” I agree with this statement, which correlates to Krunal Dangar’s view that creation, intuition, and empathy spring from the Divine Feminine. Garlinger goes on to state:

By contrast, the Divine Father or Masculine is the expression of Source through infinite forms. If the Divine Feminine is the Source from which we all spring, the Divine Masculine is the infinite variety and multiplicity of forms that we can take as extensions of that Source. The fact that human beings, and all other life forms, can take infinite forms, shapes, and permutations is life expanding and proliferating. Diversity of form is the Divine Masculine principle.

This is a nice theoretical attempt to tie things in a nice yellow bow without bruising the male ego. Does it withstand scrutiny? Human beings take infinite form? I doubt there are even an infinite amount of DNA sequences of our 30 million genes that can produce a viable human, although it is certainly such a huge number as to make the theory acceptable to many. (614 zeros is a ridiculously huge number). But when you consider how alike each of many of the extant 7 billion are, it starts to remind me of the claims of MLM companies that are taken as true because they look true and often tell a nice story.

The more likely construct and men would probably chest-bump over it, is that divine feminine somehow became the term for soul while divine masculine became the term for human; and the not-so-nice story is that for millennia souls have been losing the battle, which doesn’t surprise me as most would find life in Heaven boring, and that may be why so many souls agree to endure ever more pain life cycle after life cycle.

Spirituality
Awakening
Integration
Gender
Divine Feminine
Recommended from ReadMedium