avatarJennifer Geer

Summary

The author's article on the tampon shortage, initially underperforming on Medium with only eight reads, found success on Vocal media, becoming a "Top Story" and earning a $5 bonus.

Abstract

The author recounts their experience with an article about the American tampon shortage, which was met with minimal engagement on Medium, garnering only eight reads and a "Not distributed" status. Despite this setback, the same article was published on Vocal, where it was featured as a "Top Story" and earned the author a $5 bonus. This outcome not only provided financial validation but also contrasted sharply with the lack of response on Medium. The author attributes the initial flop to the Medium curation process and suggests that writers should not be disheartened by poor performance on one platform, as another may yield better results and exposure.

Opinions

  • The author implies that Medium's curation process can be slow and may not always recognize the potential of a story.
  • The author expresses satisfaction with the recognition and financial reward received from Vocal, indicating a preference for the platform's approach to featuring content.
  • There is a sense of discouragement when a piece does not perform well, as reflected in the author's reaction to the Medium experience.
  • The author encourages other writers not to dismiss their work based on a single platform's reception, advocating for trying different avenues for publication.
  • The author believes in the value of their article and the importance of reaching an audience, emphasizing the joy of having one's work read by others.

My ‘Not Distributed’ Story on Medium Became a ‘Top Story’ On Vocal

Proof that if your story flops on one platform, you should try another

Photo by arastorguev/Depositphotos.com

I recently wrote a story about the latest shortage Americans are facing these days, tampons.

I published the story on Medium, where it currently sits with a whopping eight reads, (earning me 34 cents,) and a current status of, “Not distributed, with status Pending review.”

screenshot by author

This message means my story has not even been looked at by Medium curators in the slightly over one week that it has sat on the platform.

(If you’re interested, I get this helpful information from a Chrome extension, Medium Distribution Info, which you can find in the chrome web store.)

You don’t have to give up on a failed article

I published the same article on Vocal, with no changes, where I was pleasantly surprised to receive an email telling me my tampon shortage story was a “top story,” and I had received a $5 bonus.

screenshot by author

Now $5 may not be much, but it’s more than the 34 cents the story made on Medium. It will also get more exposure on Vocal since they put top stories on their front page.

Hopefully, I’ll earn something more from those reads than 34 cents.

It’s also validation that my article wasn’t nearly as bad as I began to think it was after publishing it on Medium to an encore of crickets. And it’s nice to think more than a handful of people might read the article.

After all, isn’t that what we are all looking for when we write? For someone to read what we have to say.

If your story flops on one platform, don’t write it off as bad writing. You may find someone else appreciates it a little bit more.

You’ll never know unless you try.

Don’t have a Medium membership? Click here if you’d like to receive unlimited access to all of my writing and everything else on Medium. Note: this is an affiliate link, and I will receive a portion of your membership fees.

Join Vocal+ today with my referral to start publishing and sharing your own stories on Vocal Media. (Full disclosure: I do get a small commission if you click my referral links.)

It Happened To Me
Writing
Illumination
Medium
Vocal Media
Recommended from ReadMedium