Mindhack: Strengthen Your MetaPhysique
The Quantum Physical Fitness Revolution

You can get ripped abs just by thinking it. But first you need to learn how to think. Then you need to think hard core. This is the science behind the technique of abs-traction, the mystery of The Abs•Tract: Core Philosophy, the ultimate metaphysical fitness program. By practicing kinesthetic visualizing through mental imagery of the body, you increase the strength of the neocortical output signal, which activates and increases muscle strength.
This doesn’t mean you can literally sit around and manifest muscles, but you can in a sense will yourself to strength. For example, if you break your arm in an accident, you should imagine yourself exercising it, because it keeps the neural pathways strong. This will maintain a higher level of muscle strength, as well as improve recovery time.
Visualization also increases proprioceptive (spatial awareness) abilities through the cognitive mapping of the body schema. This gives new meaning to the phrase “know thyself.” Through conscious refinement of one’s body schema and exercise of the imagined self, one can leverage their insight to multiply muscle strength.
This technique is supported by four papers on the mind-body interface. Two papers about the mental-muscle connection, and two papers about body schema mapping. Below that, two more papers have been added on the effect of placebos and power posing to enhance fitness. Through proper mental and physical training, one can optimize mind-body fitness, (dis-)embodied in the concept of a ‘MetaPhysique’; the metaphysical/ conceptual self.

The MetaPhysique
The first paper From mental power to muscle power — gaining strength by using the mind (2004) concludes that “mental training employed by this study enhances the cortical output signal, which drives the muscles to a higher activation level and increases strength.”
More recent research along these lines is carried out in The power of the mind: the cortex as a critical determinant of muscle strength/weakness (2014). “Mental imagery has been shown to activate several cortical areas that are involved with actual motor behaviors” [and] “regular activation of the cortical regions via imagery attenuates weakness and VA (voluntary action) by maintaining normal levels of inhibition.”
In laymen’s terms, merely by thinking of the exercise, the motor-neural pathways are activated, and the loss of strength associated with immobility will be reduced. The papers go on to cite that this accounts for up to 50% of strength. The particulars beyond this are quite boring, and one is flabbergasted by the depth of empirical science to prove the obvious, but it highlights the importance of training mind and body together. Most important, it emphasizes the abstract power of the mind, and that it does not labor for nothing.

These images help break down anatomy into basic geometric mechanical relationships. It is the lucid abstraction of the human form.
Now that we know that we can mentalize our muscular anatomy to such effect, we must map out the body we will be puppeting. The next two papers explain how we construct a mental model of our physical selves; the MetaPhysique. According to the paper Neural representation of human body schema and corporeal self-consciousness (2014), the left fronto-parietal network appears to control the inverse kinematics of movement, while right creates the holographic projection of the self.
“Neuroimaging techniques have revealed neuronal substrates for human body schema,” as somatic signals are integrated up through the motor cortex into “higher-order somatosensory parietal cortices… capable of representing a postural model of the entire body.” In order words, scientists are able to measure brain activity representing the imagined self in coordinate space.
This latter point is addressed more explicitly in the paper Tactile remapping: from coordinate transformation to integration in sensorimotor processing (2015) “Tactile localization entails the transformation of the initial skin-based location into an external reference frame that accounts for body posture and subsequent flexible integration of these two reference frames… We suggest that spatial localization is best viewed as a process of integrating multiple concurrently active spatial representations rather than a sequential transformation process.”
In a way, this is just the banal proof of what we already know intuitively — that visualization is good, and it works — but the point of articulating it allows us to refine the process. The theme of mapping reality from our senses to our minds is one of abstraction, as has been discussed with respect to human evolution and worldview formation in The Abstraction of Jordan Peterson, but here it is of the flesh.

We can abstractly start to build this character in our imagination. Take our malformed homunculus and sculpt a superhero action figure. What is human movement potential if not to have the stature of gods? We don’t need to know exactly how it works at the biological level in order to do this (that is the subject of the papers), but we do have to understand the principles and geometry behind it. We aren’t stick people. Fundamentally, movement is figured in terms of the relationship between the skeletal and muscle layers of the body, controlled by the nervous system.
Our curved bones and spiralled muscles are part of a dynamic system, mechanically moving 206 bones with over 600 muscles. We need a simple set of rules and first principles to entrain the mind-body projection (what I call the meta-physique).
For example, good posture could be defined as optimal spinal balance at maximum height under minimal tension. This is executed by the simple heuristic of keeping the crown of the head up, but it is actually engaged by certain muscle configurations. From such a benchmark of stillness, we can isolate body parts and move others independently, orienting our abstract self. Likewise, by countless more heuristics we can articulate the body in and through space.

Actually, this field of inquiry has already been quite established with Human movement potential: its ideokinetic facilitation (1974) by Lulu Sweigard. The term ideokinesis — “imagined movement” — was developed back in 1920, by Mabel Elsworth Todd in The Thinking Body. Todd was one of a handful of pioneers transforming the dance and movement. Sweigard was a dedicated student of Todd who took it to the level of scientific verification.
This groundbreaking work systematizes the methodology of optimal movement. It is a conceptual precursor to the “functional movement” turn in sports medicine of this decade. The essence of it is energy conservation and stability achieved through advanced coordination. The scientific studies above make no reference to ideokinesis, reflecting a naivete about this experiential knowledge and qualitative field work.
It is typical of science in late capitalism, with it’s narrow focus and data fetishism, to miss the forest through the trees. The origin story of ideokinesis is noteworthy as well. Todd was impaired with childhood illness and later by an injury that forced her to have to literally learn to walk again:
“Soon after her graduation from the Keble School, Mabel suffered a back injury in a terrible fall from which it was feared she might never recover. For months, she struggled with pain and debilitating weakness until she found a way to take charge of her own recovery. Her high school study of physics served as the foundation for a rudimentary understanding of body mechanics that she expanded through further reading. Then, concentrating on specific aspects of anatomy and kinesiology as she attempted simple movements, Mabel gradually strengthened her body and improved her walking gait.” — ideokinesis.com
PRIME Movement
The idea of the MetaPhysque is precisely what is captured in The Abs-Tract technique of MetaWalking (tm), the ultimate mobilizing metaphor:




