avatarIbrahim Alkuraya

Summary

The article presents a new divisibility rule for three-digit numbers composed of consecutive digits, proving that such numbers are always divisible by three and extending this rule to six and nine-digit numbers.

Abstract

The author of the article shares their enthusiasm for discovering new mathematical patterns and the joy of proving conjectures. They introduce a novel divisibility rule specific to three-digit numbers with consecutive digits, such as 123 or 321. This rule states that any such number is divisible by three, regardless of the order of the digits. The proof provided hinges on representing the digits with a consecutive integer sequence and demonstrating that the sum of these digits is always divisible by three. The article also suggests that this proof can be extended to numbers with more digits, like six and nine-digit numbers, and encourages readers to explore mathematics for similar hidden patterns.

Opinions

  • The author finds great joy in mathematical exploration and the process of discovering and proving patterns.
  • They express a sense of surprise and satisfaction upon discovering the new divisibility rule.
  • The author values the discovery of mathematical patterns, even if their immediate practical use is limited.
  • They believe that there are many undiscovered mathematical tricks and encourage others to engage in mathematical exploration.
  • The author acknowledges that some conjectures may be disproven by counterexamples, but emphasizes the excitement of mathematical discovery.

Mental Math: A New Divisibility Rule for Three-Digit Numbers (and more!)

Photo by Mike Szczepanski on Unsplash

DISCLAIMER: I am not aware of this proof being published by anyone else.

What is fascinating about mathematics is how a simple rule can open the door to a plethora of others. I find great joy in playing with numbers on my calculator to try to uncover yet another secret. Sometimes, my little conjectures (statements based on a pattern and not solid proof) are ripped apart by the most obvious counterexamples. Other times, I feel so shocked that the pattern I noticed works for more than three numbers (yes, my standards are quite high) that I know for fact there must be something wrong, which there inadvertently is.

Then, once in a blue moon, I find something that withstands test after test. Tentatively, I work out a proof. Let me just say that working out a proof for a conjecture, no matter how silly (as this one is), is perhaps my greatest source of joy in math.

We’ve all learned the divisibility rule of three at school: if the sum of the digits in a number is divisible by three, then so is that number. But what if there is another rule for three digit numbers? I love patterns, so I worked with three-digit numbers whose digits are related in some sort of way.

So, I worked with three-digit numbers formed by consecutive digits. This means that the three digits in a number come right after another, like 123 (or 321, 213, 132, 231, 312 — the order doesn’t matter so long as the digits are right after another).

Punching numbers into my calculator, I found the following pattern:

Any three digit number formed of consecutive digits is divisible by three.

This was a surprise. Unsure whether it was pure luck, I decided to attempt to write a proof. Unbelievably, it worked. Here it is below:

  1. Assume the three digit number has the digits XYZ, where X, Y, and Z are consecutive.
  2. For the sake of convention, let’s represent X by n.
  3. Since the integers are consecutive, then Y = n + 1 AND Z = n + 2
  4. Notice that it does not matter whether the number is XYZ or YZX: it will not change the value.
  5. Add X, Y, and Z. You will get n + (n+1) + (n+2) = 3n+3
  6. Divide (3n + 3) by 3 and you will get n + 1, without any remainder. Since the sum is divisible by three, then the number is divisible by three. It is also shown that the order of the consecutive integers does not matter.

Q.E.D

This proof can be extended to six-digit numbers and nine-digit ones.

What are the uses of this trick? Well, not much, if only to avoid tedious addition. But take a moment and think how many other hidden tricks lie out there, waiting to be discovered.

Perhaps the next time you find yourself bored, you can take out the calculator, punch in some numbers, and find your next best pattern.

Math
Proof
Mathematical Science
Three
Illumination
Recommended from ReadMedium