avatarRasheed Hooda

Summary

Medium has updated its content policies, emphasizing the importance of quality over quantity and clarifying rules to prevent gaming the system, impacting writers' strategies for success on the platform.

Abstract

Medium has recently implemented changes to its Partner Program and content guidelines, shifting the focus from clap count to read time to reward quality content. This move aims to address concerns about writers manipulating the system for financial gain without maintaining the platform's standards for content quality. The changes have significant implications for writers, particularly new ones, who now have to ensure their work is curated by Medium editors and cannot rely on republishing content to test its success. The updated policy encourages writers to produce their best work immediately, as there is no longer an option to revise and resubmit. This development is seen as beneficial for readers, as it promises to reduce 'fluff' content, and for dedicated writers who are willing to adapt and treat their writing as a business.

Opinions

  • The author views Medium's policy changes as an opportunity for new writers to succeed based on the quality of their content.
  • There is an appreciation for Medium's commitment to maintaining high standards for content, which is expected to enhance the reading experience by reducing low-quality articles.
  • The author acknowledges the importance of adaptability and a professional approach to writing, suggesting that writers should observe, analyze, and improve continuously.
  • The author expresses admiration for Shaunta Grimes' insights and her practice of sharing updates about Medium's changes with the writing community.
  • The new policy is seen as a positive change that will encourage writers to be more thoughtful and deliberate with their submissions, knowing that only their best work should be published.
  • The author is optimistic about their personal success on Medium, focusing on controllable factors and adapting to the platform's evolving guidelines.

Medium did what? You don’t say.

What to do, what to do?

Photo by Yang Xia on Unsplash

Extra! Extra! Medium changes rules again.

(Even though it’s only clarification, and the intent to enforce its existing rules)

I am relatively new to writing on medium. I’ve only been doing it for a little over a month. Prior to that, I didn’t even know I could get paid for writing on Medium.

It was a story by Shaunta Grimes about the recent changes to the Medium’s Partner Program(MPP), from claps to read time, that brought to my attention the fact that it was even a thing.

So I dug right into it, learning everything I can about it from people who have been doing it for a while. What I understood was, and I may be wrong, that Medium felt that some writers were gaming the system to make more money without providing the quality of content which Medium had come to be known for.

Again, I may be just shooting in the dark with that interpretation. Still, Medium changed the rules to reward quality content as determined by the time spent reading, as opposed to the popular content determined by clap count.

As a new writer, that was exciting for me. It meant I had an excellent chance to be successful if I produced quality content that people would spend time reading.

I learned, to be successful as a writer on Medium, one of the goals was to get curated by the Medium editors. The curation guidelines emphasized quality as the prime criterion for curation, in addition to proper formatting for the platform. So, I knew I was on the right track when one of my stories was selected for curation in two different topics after submitting only a few stories. Medium curated three of my first 15 stories. A far cry from where I would like to be, but it’s a start.

Another thing I read as a success strategy from seasoned writers, especially under the new MPP, was to republish some of your old content that was no longer being read much. Or, delete more recent work that wasn’t curated and republish it in the hope that it will get curated. Well, that strategy is null and void, even though I didn’t have enough backlog to make it work.

Did Medium construed that it was double-dipping or gaming the system?

Whether that was anyone’s intent or not, Medium has made it clear by sending out emails, I have not received one, but Shaunta has included a screenshot in her story about the changes. I recommend you read it to get more details. I have always admired her writing and how she keeps herself up abreast of matters concerning Medium. She is so generous about sharing it with everyone else as well.

Here is her advice in light of the latest development.

It’s now highly important that you put your absolute best work out immediately. There’s no chance to take it down and try again. No revise and resubmit, in other words. You get one chance.

Or to put it bluntly, you can’t throw stuff on the wall and see what sticks. As a reader, I like that because it will rid of a lot of fluff that we have to read to get to the good stuff. As a new writer, it excites me because the readers will find value in our stories and will be more inclined to continue as a paid member.

A willingness to adjust and adapt is the most crucial trait of successful people. If you want to earn a living as a writer, you must treat writing as a business. Observe, analyze, and improve.

I didn’t know what to expect or how to determine what would qualify as success when I started the journey as a writer on Medium. I am happy thus far with the results I am seeing. There are things that I can control, and there are other things I can’t. As long as I stay focused on doing what I can within my power, I can control my destiny.

Before you go…

You can let others tell you what it means to be successful, or you can decide it for yourself.” If you agree, you’ll like my free weekly emails. Get it here… Freedom Lifestyle

Humor
Writing
Success
Entrepreneurship
Making Money Online
Recommended from ReadMedium