This context explains the difference between double equals (==) and triple equals (===) in JavaScript, focusing on type coercion and strict equality.
Abstract
The context starts by introducing the concept of double equals (==) and triple equals (===) in JavaScript, explaining that double equals tests for standard equality and triple equals tests for strict equality. The author emphasizes that the key to understanding this difference lies in learning about type coercion in JavaScript, a dynamically typed language. Type coercion occurs because JavaScript tries to be resilient against programming errors, such as comparing a number and a string.
The author then goes on to explain the concept of truthy and falsy values in JavaScript. There are six falsy values: false, 0 (zero), "", null, undefined, and NaN (Not A Number). Everything else is considered truthy. The author also provides examples and explanations of how truthy and falsy values work in JavaScript.
Finally, the author delves into the technical details of how the strict equality operators and standard equality operators work in JavaScript, providing the exact algorithms used by the language.
Bullet points
Double equals (==) test for standard equality and triple equals (===) test for strict equality in JavaScript.
Type coercion is an essential concept in understanding the difference between double equals and triple equals in JavaScript.
Type coercion occurs because JavaScript tries to be resilient against programming errors, such as comparing a number and a string.
JavaScript has six falsy values: false, 0 (zero), "", null, undefined, and NaN (Not A Number).
Everything else in JavaScript is considered truthy.
The strict equality operators and standard equality operators use different algorithms in JavaScript.
The author provides examples and explanations of how truthy and falsy values work in JavaScript.
Making Sense of == vs. === in JavaScript
Double equals (==) test standard equality and triple equals (===) test strict equality
Equal should be equal, right? JavaScript’s triple equals comparison always used to confuse me. Most languages have == but not ===.
Here’s the difference between double and triple equals in JavaScript:
“Use [===] strict equality operators if the operands must be of a specific type as well as value or if the exact type of the operands is important.
Otherwise, use [==] the standard equality operators, which allow you to compare the identity of two operands even if they are not of the same type.” —MDN web docs
The key for my understanding was to learn about “type coercion” — an odd concept in Vanilla JavaScript, which is a dynamically typed language.
Type coercion occurs because JavaScript tries to be resilient against programming errors, such as comparing a number and a string.
“Comparing false, 0, and "" with loose equality (==) will result in equality. null and undefined are only equal to themselves. NaN isn’t equivalent to anything (not even itself!).” — JavaScript Showdown: == vs. ===
Fortunately, everything else is truthy, according to the MDN web docs:
“In JavaScript, a truthy value is a value that is considered true when encountered in a Boolean context. All values are truthy unless they are defined as falsy (i.e., except for false, 0, "", null, undefined, and NaN).
A Peek Under the Hood: How It Really Works in ECMAScript
For those curious, here are the exact algorithms used by JavaScript:
→ c. If x is the same Number value as y, return true.
→ d. If x is +0 and y is −0, return true.
→ e. If x is −0 and y is +0, return true.
→ f. Return false.
5. If Type(x) is String, then return true if x and y are exactly the same sequence of characters (same length and same characters in corresponding positions); otherwise, return false.
6. If Type(x) is Boolean, return true if x and y are both true or both false; otherwise, return false.
7. Return true if x and y refer to the same object. Otherwise, return false.
→ → iii. If x is the same Number value as y, return true.
→ → iv. If x is +0 and y is −0, return true.
→ → v. If x is −0 and y is +0, return true.
→ → vi. Return false.
→ d. If Type(x) is String, then return true if x and y are exactly the same sequence of characters (same length and same characters in corresponding positions). Otherwise, return false.
→ e. If Type(x) is Boolean, return true if x and y are both true or both false. Otherwise, return false.
→ f. Return true if x and y refer to the same object. Otherwise, return false.
2. If x is null and y is undefined, return true.
3. If x is undefined and y is null, return true.
4. If Type(x) is Number and Type(y) is String, return the result of the comparison x == ToNumber(y).
5. If Type(x) is String and Type(y) is Number, return the result of the comparison ToNumber(x) == y.
6. If Type(x) is Boolean, return the result of the comparison ToNumber(x) == y.
7. If Type(y) is Boolean, return the result of the comparison x == ToNumber(y).
8. If Type(x) is either String or Number and Type(y) is Object, return the result of the comparison x == ToPrimitive(y).
9. If Type(x) is Object and Type(y) is either String or Number, return the result of the comparison ToPrimitive(x) == y.
10. Return false.
NOTE 1 — Given the above definition of equality:
• String comparison can be forced by: "" + a == "" + b.
• Numeric comparison can be forced by: +a == +b.
• Boolean comparison can be forced by: !a == !b.
NOTE 2 — The equality operators maintain the following invariants:
• A != B is equivalent to !(A == B).
• A == B is equivalent to B == A, except in the order of evaluation of A and B.
NOTE 3 The equality operator is not always transitive. For example, there might be two distinct String objects, each representing the same String value; each String object would be considered equal to the String value by the == operator, but the two String objects would not be equal to each other. For example:
• new String("a") == "a" and "a" == new String("a")are both true.
• new String("a") == new String("a") is false.
NOTE 4 Comparison of Strings uses a simple equality test on sequences of code unit values. There is no attempt to use the more complex, semantically oriented definitions of character or string equality and collating order defined in the Unicode specification. Therefore Strings values that are canonically equal according to the Unicode standard could test as unequal. In effect this algorithm assumes that both Strings are already in normalized form.
Conclusion
Generally, I prefer === and !==, except when I have a good reason to use == or !=, such as in the case of null checks.
When checking for null, knowing that null and undefined are equal with == can be useful.