avatarPatricia Jeanne

Summary

The article discusses the philosophical debates among captive gorillas, including Koko, who communicated through sign language, and reflects on the implications of their captivity and intelligence.

Abstract

The piece humorously anthropomorphizes gorillas, particularly Koko, engaging in profound philosophical discussions akin to human philosophers. It explores the complexities of their captivity, the use of sign language to convey deep messages about love and environmental conservation, and the impact of human influence on their lives. The gorillas' interactions, including playful and serious debates, are compared to those of human intellectuals, suggesting a level of primate intelligence and emotional depth that challenges traditional views on animal cognition. The article also touches on the ethical considerations of keeping intelligent animals in captivity for research and entertainment purposes, advocating for their right to live in their natural habitat.

Opinions

  • The article implies that gorillas like Koko possess a level of intelligence and emotional capacity that allows them to engage in philosophical contemplation, challenging the notion that such depth is unique to humans.
  • There is a subtle critique of the use of captive animals for research, suggesting that the safety and security provided by captivity come at the cost of the animals' self-sufficiency and natural way of life.
  • The piece humorously elevates the status of Koko and her fellow gorillas to that of ancient philosophers, using satire to question the treatment of captive primates and the broader implications for human-animal relationships.
  • The author expresses a belief that communication, even across species, is crucial for understanding and empathy, and should not be limited by the confines of captivity.
  • The article playfully mocks human philosophical debates by comparing them to the imagined discussions among gorillas, highlighting the absurdity of human existence and the philosophical questions we grapple with.
  • It also pokes fun at the online discourse and the self-importance of social media personalities, juxtaposing them with the "philosophical warfare" of the gorillas.

GORILLA PHILOSOPHICAL WARFARE

Koko and Her Gorilla Pals Debate Philosophy With Smillew

Captive primates signal impressions of ancient philosophers

Philosophical sages. Canva. Source: Author

“There is nothing to fear but fear itself. And Ativan will fix that.” — Lizzie Lizard Brain

The genius of philosophers often isn’t recognized during their lifetimes.

Smillew Rahcuef will surely join the ranks of Plato, Socrates, and Bugs Bunny should our species endure. Braving the Great Twitter Wars of 2023, the skilled orator’s often profound, clever quips amuse many. He earns titles like “King Smillew Milieu,” “Rahcuef’s Gray Matters,” and the troll default, “Asshat.”

Promoting intelligent philosophical debate on a woman’s number of sexual partners, clickbait and emotional manipulation can be a challenge. Little heavy lifting was necessary when musing on the life and humanity’s influence on the captive gorilla Koko.

Koko (1971–2018) was a gorilla born in a zoo who “enjoyed” being an experimental subject for (almost) five decades of her life.

The great ape’s use of sign language helped her communicate the immortal message, “Koko is love. Nature is love. Both love humans. But Humans stupid. Stop destroying Earth.”

Socrates, Confucious, Barbie in her Dream House, and Nietzsche couldn’t have put it better.

Koko’s younger “friend” Michael also learned signals. Besides expressing the complexities of relationship frustrations through the speed, power, and amount of poop hurled at one another, they used sign language.

The middle finger was a favorite.

Researchers didn’t witness the Wednesday night “What?” philosophical discussion among a group of existential primates.

Quotes from Rene Descartes, The Roadrunner, and Nietzche appeared on a hidden agenda in 2007.

Fortune bananas for hidden agendas. Canva. Source: Author

Several undercover primates shared their thoughts on consciousness, motivation, and the danger of being seen by humans.

Their kids lived in harmony — a good sign for conflicted believers.

Aspiring Buddhist Profound Billy, and Curious Little George. Canva. Source: Author

While not everyone could agree on how to spend their time dealing with the complexities of the Universe, The Watchers and Thinkers kept peace.

Vigilant Nanny Nancy and Grandfather Jimbo. Canva. Source: Author

As the kids grew so did their curiosity, varied success with meditation, and attempts to uphold community standards.

The Thompson Twins believed the end was near. Baby Bonzo would need modern therapy. Canva. Source: Author

Not all of the parents were on the same page in their philosophical, religious, or socialization teaching methods. A swinging-by-the-feet group reportedly spent too much time watching YouTube where they were told a small amount of trauma would prepare their children for success.

The Radley boy was a concern.

Born under a bad sign. Canva. Source: Author

The wise philosopher primates debated the circles of Hell and whether humans possess intelligence.

Why Camus wouldn’t pick a pebble instead of a giant boulder in his never-ending absurd trek uphill dominated much of the conversation.

Meek Milo went to the hills to reflect on why the doomed soul didn’t swing from his tail, and what was so great about a rock.

Meek Milo communes with those beyond the veil. Canva. Source: Author

Taking a cue from Descartes while acknowledging the absurdity of life, only one thought was agreed on — “We eat, therefore, we poop.”

Wise Willey called the meeting to a close. Canva. Source: Author

Don’t feel bad for Wise Willey. He’s not conflicted — he’s constipated.

Glycerine suppositories will be dropped via Amazon drones by Tuesday.

Parts of Koko’s life in captivity may have been pleasant, and she surely helped researchers understand gorilla intelligence. Yet I can’t help but think she and fellow caged zoo animals belong in their natural habitat.

All living organisms must adapt to their environment to survive. Safety and security afforded by not having to fight and hunt are comfortable, but come at the cost of self-sufficiency.

Communication in whatever language skills we possess helps break down barriers and broadens our understanding of other cultures.

Let’s do that, but not through cages.

Meanwhile, Smillew and other Mediumizens can be found lost in the jungles of X (or Twitter, or Musk’s ego) engaged in gorilla combat with words and good ideas.

Thanks to Smillew Rahcuef for permission and the best Freud line. 🐵🍌

Copyright © 2023 Patricia Jeanne

Lizzie Lizard Brain now has her own profile and is thinking of starting a publication/massive identity theft ring. She can get a little dark and manic in her enthusiasm.

Satire
Humor
Long Live Grandma Smillew
Gorilla
Philosophy Of Life
Recommended from ReadMedium