Election 2020

Joe Biden’s UFO Briefing Memo

The UFO bombshell just dropped into the 2020 election, Mr. Vice President. You’d best get up-to-speed, create a policy, and do it fast.

Here is the updated version, based on election results.

Here is the original post, prior to the election.

Decisions, Decisions

Mr. Vice President, based on all news accounts, you’re deeply involved with picking the person who will serve as the nation’s vice-president should you defeat President Trump in November. Consider putting this issue next on your “to do” list.

Your Next Big Decision

There’s just no way around this. You need a policy about how you are going to deal with UFOs. In fact, you’ll have to decide if you’re even going to call them that, or whether you’ll use UAP, the new acronym that indicates Unidentified Aerial Phenomena.

Either way, the U.S. Navy, the Department of Defense, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, Marco Rubio, Harry Reid, the New York Times, half the Twittersphere and even Donald Trump Jr. and his dad have just dumped UFOs smack dab into the middle of your march to the White House.

You are going to be asked about this, and soon, and you better not make a joke about it and talk about little green men. That won’t work anymore. The issue has gotten very serious very quickly.

The Questions You’ll Be Asked

The questions are waiting for you now, and you’ll get them in a virtual town hall, a news conference or even a presidential debate. The predicate to them may sound something like this:

Mr. Vice President, just this year alone, the Department of Defense has confirmed that three U.S. Navy videos of pilot encounters with Unidentified Aerial Phenomena are legitimate, and they have admitted they have a UAP Task Force set up within the Office of Naval Intelligence. The Senate Intelligence Committee has asked for a full report from the intel community in the next 180 days. And the New York Times has written a series of articles that claim, among other things, that the U.S. government is in possession of crash wreckage of these Advanced Aerospace Vehicles.

The specific questions they ask after making that statement may include:

• Will you declassify UFO data? Release the high-resolution full versions of the Navy videos if they exist?
• Does the U.S. possess crash wreckage from “off-world” vehicles? What do you think happened in Roswell, New Mexico in 1947?
• Are you aware that these UAP vehicles have repeatedly shown an interest in the world’s nuclear arsenals, including missile silos, nuclear-powered ships and even power plants? What would you do about it?
• Were you officially briefed on this topic either as a Senator or as the Vice-President, and what did you learn?
• Are systems in place with other world powers so that mistakes are not made in a UAP encounter with military forces that could lead to hostilities with China or Russia? If not, will you now set them up?

There are many places to get the information to answer such questions. You could call up your old pals like Harry Reid, John Podesta, Bill Richardson and even Bill and Hillary Clinton, all of whom seem to know a lot about the topic. You can read the New York Times articles. And, as seems standard in elections (unless Trump violates that norm as well), candidates receive classified briefings where you can ask questions of intelligence officials.

To get you started, however, let’s start with a basic unclassified version.

Your Basic UFO Briefing

For absolute starters, UFOs have always existed since, by definition, any object in the air that you can’t identify is one of them.

As has often been said, even by people who know the most about the phenomenon, most sightings can be explained away. Yet anyone who has done any research knows that a large, stubborn, significant collection of them have always defied easy explanation.

Estimate of the Situation

If you haven’t spent some time reviewing the thousands of high-quality sightings, pilot encounters, police and military witnesses and radar confirmations, you should. There’s definitely a there there.

The existence of these anomalous objects has been confirmed by a number of official programs over the years — from Project Sign and Project Grudge to the Air Force’s public relations ploy Project Blue Book in the 1950s and 1960s to the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) that was funded by a trio of U.S. senators in 2007. And, of course, there is the UAP Task Force, now hard at work inside the ONI.

The Famous Nimitz Video

The most significant development in years, of course, is the release of those three videos from the United States Navy — Gimbal, Go Fast and Flir — first described in the New York Times in December 2017.

There are excellent cases across the decades for you to look into but, because it’s so recent, let’s look at just one, the Nimitz Carrier Strike Force case, from November 14, 2004, back when you were in the U.S. Senate.

Commander David Fravor, a no-nonsense Naval aviator, along with his backseater, and his wingwoman and her backseater, all have stated that while flying F/A-18 Super Hornet’s they witnessed a flying object, now known as the “Tic-Tac” that had no wings, no rudders, no ailerons, no fins, no visible propulsion system or exhaust plumes, and yet stayed aloft and could out maneuver anything known within the United States military inventory or any other inventory on Earth.

This incident involved the occupants of two planes flying at two different altitudes for over five minutes on a sunny day with unlimited visibility. After Fravor and his wingwoman landed, another Naval aviator, Chad Underwood took off, and was able to record video footage of the Tic-Tac.

Seaborne Spy-1 radar on the U.S.S. Princeton, and airborne radar on an E-2 Hawkeye, both tracked the same object visually. So, pilots, check; radar, check.

Finally, the U.S. Navy and the Department of Defense have had over fifteen years to study the multitude of sensor data collected during Fravor’s encounter and to this day they affirm it’s truly unknown.

The Bottom Line

These objects are real, intelligently controlled, and high tech. Not weather balloons, drones or some other prosaic explanation.

The former head of the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program, Luis Elizondo, and his colleagues routinely studied incursions into highly restricted military airspace and over American sovereign territory. They described the common descriptions they received as the five “observables.” They are:

• Anti-gravity lift
• Sudden and instantaneous acceleration
• Hypersonic velocities without signatures (no heat trails)
• Low observability (cloaking)
• Trans-medium travel (air and sea)

This is the conclusion of a government funded operation, not one in the distant past, but one that has been at work in your recent career.

The least likely explanation for what we’re dealing with is that they are us. This would mean that the United States has incredible secret technology that defies the laws of physics and tests them under dangerous conditions against other U.S. military hardware. And that we’ve had these devices since the late 1940s because these observables were being seen repeatedly by our pilots even back then, both during and after WWII.

Equally unlikely is that Russia or China has leapfrogged us in technology. If that’s true, then we are in a world of trouble from these adversaries, and U.S. representatives and senators should be running through the Capitol with their hair on fire. Look at the reaction Sputnik got in the 1950s. Why would we be less concerned today?

Potential Electoral Impact

It may not feel like it, but voters are increasingly aware of this issue and care about what it means for the world, our country and themselves. A recent Gallup poll reveals sensational information:

• 16% (52 million Americans) have seen a UFO
• 33% (108 million Americans) think UFOs are extraterrestrial
• 68% (222 million Americans) think the government isn’t telling the truth

There is a base out there, not just for Trump’s MAGA hats or your Biden buttons, but for some facts about UFO reality.

The Great Debates of 2020

With a public battered by coronavirus, racial justice protests, and a sputtering economy, it may seem to you like an unnecessary distraction to have to discuss such matters.

It may not be your choice. This issue is on the minds of a sizable number of voters, a growing amount of reporters, and even your opponent who has confirmed in a Father’s Day interview with his oldest son that, yes, he has received a briefing about Roswell that he found “very interesting,” and that he would consider declassifying information about it in the future.

Given that the framework for the issue is no longer sci-fi but national security, it’s likely to be asked in one of the three scheduled 90 minutes long debates. That’s four-and-a-half hours of questions and answers. Time enough.

If/when that happens, cable news will blow up with scientists, celebrity abductees, whistleblowers, witnesses, pilots, and God knows who else, all talking about this subject.

2020 Could Turn into a National Security Election

You are ahead in the polls currently. As all the pundits agree, that makes your opponent even more unpredictable than ever. It is just this side of possible that President Trump could decide that his October Surprise could be to turn this into a national security election to distract from his widely perceived shortcomings in handling the coronavirus and racial justice protests.

Trump might try to portray himself as tough on aliens. He would try to paint you as a dangerous, out-of-touch pacifist. The Trump campaign could then ask whose finger voters want on the button if there are ETs buzzing our aircraft carriers and missile silos. He’ll remind us how he can be very, very strong, the strongest president in all of history, or so he’ll say he’s been told.

What will you say in response?

Some of the viewers in such a debate will know nothing about this topic, or just some of it, but others will know a great deal. You need to sound informed on the subject for all of them.

Granted, some of what you know may be classified if you received briefings while in office. Still, what is going to be needed from you during the election is a simple clean admission that is honest and straightforward. Here’s a first draft:

“It’s clear from the evidence presented that some of these objects are truly unexplained. I do not dismiss or take that evidence lightly. As president, I will work with the nation’s military, Congress, and our own citizens to gather the relevant information. While some parts of this issue may need to remain classified, I will lean toward transparency and report back to the American people on what I’ve learned. Saying that information on this subject is need-to-know as a way to justify unwarranted secrecy will no longer be allowed in my Administration because I believe that need-to-know applies to every single person watching this debate tonight.”

It would be a good time to start boning up on this subject now. Call me anytime.