
NBA Hot Take 12–31–17
It’s always darkest before the dawn
The Lakers end 2017 with a double overtime loss, but there’s still plenty of cause for hope in the New Year.
It’s been three weeks since my last deep dive into the Lakers and the NBA. Spending the Christmas holidays with my wife’s family, I’m writing this at the dining room table in a suburb south of Paris, 5,642 miles from home, and totally cut off from NBA broadcasts. The French version of New Year’s Eve is “Le Reveillion,” and usually lasts until 3 or 4 in the morning, regardless of whether you are out on the town, or simply dining with the family. When we finally got home, I checked out the results on my computer and was amazed to see the Lakers up 125–122 in the first overtime. Rather than sleep, I followed the ESPN play by play and saw the Lakers blow a 4-point lead at the end in the second overtime.
Chapter 1: Houston 148, Los Angeles 142 2OT
Another disappointing loss, especially in conjunction with the three other overtime losses the Lakers have suffered over the last month. Another lost opportunity after the Lakers blew a 17-point 3rd quarter lead. Another black mark on a season that started with so much promise, but has seen the team lose 14 of its last 17 games.
Is it really falling apart? Are the Lakers headed for another 25-win season?
Based on how the team has played, I would say there is a very good chance they will turn their season around and make a big jump in 2018. They probably won’t make the playoffs, but they won’t end up in the bottom 5, which means their draft pick will go to Philadelphia instead of Boston. (suck it, Celtics!)
What I saw in the game stats
The Lakers were playing without three starters, Lonzo Ball, Brooke Lopez, and Kentavious Caldwell-Pope (KCP). Houston was at full strength, but their starters were banged up.
Sometimes, basketball is a game of addition by subtraction. Replacing the Lakers’ starters were Tyler Ennis (a solid point guard who shoots better than Ball), Julius Randle (the Lakers’ best two-way player and a beast on the boards), and Josh Hart (a solid defensive presence who won’t shoot the team out of the game by taking horrible 3-pointers).
The three replacements didn’t disappoint, as they combined for 75 points, 25 rebounds, and 18 assists. For context, Houston’s big 3 consists of Harden, Chris Paul and Clint Capela, and all sport PER ratings of over 25 (Randle is the highest rated Laker at 18.66). The Rockets trio combined for 75 points, 15 rebounds, and 23 assists.
For the game, the Lakers shot over 50% from the field, dominating the points in the paint (82-58), fast break points (12–3), and total rebounds (69–58). They edged the Rockets in total assists (31–29) and almost matched them in free throws attempted (37–39). The only areas they trailed Houston were 3-point field goals made (10–18), free throws made (26–32), and turnovers (16–12).
If you told me that the Lakers would dominate the 4th best team in the NBA and shot 50%, I would be overjoyed and expect a 20-point victory. Instead, they lost by 6 in double overtime, but I am still overjoyed by the way the young guys are playing and wished I had seen what should have been an unbelievably exciting game, right up there with the two overtime losses to the Warriors. This game encapsulated not only the 2017 part of this NBA season, but shows how the building blocks are being put in place for the team going forward, and also provides some perspective on the nature of being a sports fan.
Chapter 2: The Return to Greatness
The return to greatness is a three step process. It doesn’t guarantee a championship, but gives teams a chance to go the distance. Each season is completely different and subject to all kinds of factors outside a team’s control, such as injuries, a series changing play, or simply being in the wrong time and place. (Just ask all the great teams that got steam rollered by the Phil Jackson Bulls and Lakers.)
Step 1: Change the team culture.
The Lakers’ coaches and front office want to create Show Time 2.0 by running the court, sharing the ball and playing defense. Looking at this season’s advanced stats at the end of 2017, we get a very clear picture of the progress this team has made in changing the team culture by competing hard in almost every game, regardless of the current talent gap. As I mentioned above, Julius Randle is the team’s best player, with a PER rating of 18.66. Every other team in the NBA, including the league’s worst team has at least one starter with a PER over 19. Every team the Lakers play will have the best player on the court (and sometimes the top two or three), which gives them no margin for error in their games.
Here are the advanced stats that show the team’s transformation, even though their current record is one game worse than last year.
Running: Transition frequency measures how often a team creates an advantage by running the floor. In 2016–2017, the Lakers were #12. For 2017, they have jumped to #1, edging out the Warriors.
Sharing: Sharing the ball is clearly measured by team assists. In 2016–2017, the Lakers were #24. For 2017, they have jumped to #9, but need to improve to 25 assists per game to enter an historically elite level (it’s only been done by a handful of teams).
Defense: The key metric used that controls for the pace teams play at is team defensive efficiency (points per possession). In 2016–2017, the Lakers were #30. For 2017, they were in the top 10 most of the season, and are currently #15.
These factors combine to create more winning situations: If you can get stops, and rebounds (the Lakers are #10 in rebound differential), these lead to wide open 3-pointers in transition, layups on fast breaks, and free throws as teams may foul to stop easy baskets. If you spread the floor and move the ball, you are able to penetrate for shots in the paint, create open looks on 3-pointers, and put pressure on defenses that also result in more free throws. It all shows up in a statistic called expected points per possession (EEP). It should be no surprise that the Warriors are #1 in the NBA in EEP. Guess who is right behind them? Based on their style, the Lakers are #3 in EEP, but #30 in actual points per possession (APP), which shows how much the team can grow by improving in areas that are mostly within their control: finishing at the rim, making free throws and cutting down on turnovers.
Step 2: Develop the young players.
Giving lots of playing time (without running them into the ground) is a key element in developing the young core of players. As I’ve written before, Brandon Ingram worked hard in the off season to become stronger and learn to finish at the rim. With that skill, he has become one of the Lakers’ best go-to guys as he is almost unstoppable when he can get to the rim. With his work ethic, there’s a very good chance he will improve his mid range jump shots and develop a floater next year, which means he will be able to stop short and make shots if he sees a big rim protector in front of him. If he can do those things, we will see more game where he looks like Kevin Durant 2.0.
The same thing goes for Julius Randle, who has become the Lakers’ version of Draymond Green. As a small ball 5, Randle has shown he is quick enough to defend any position, and big enough to be a decent rim protector. In the Houston game, he finally got starters’ minutes and responded with perhaps the best performance of his career (29 points, 15 rebounds, 6 assists, 1 block), considering the level of the competition and the intensity of the game.
For Lonzo Ball, all I can hope is that he has a work ethic similar to Ingram, Randle and Kyle Kuzma (who transformed himself into a scoring machine after his college season ended last year). These two key rookies need to put a lot of work into shoring up their weaknesses, and I have to hope that they will get the resources and coaching to do just that after this season.
We can see the difference between winning and losing close games comes as players gain more experience.
One of the most defining differences between the Warriors and the Lakers this season was the end of regulation in their first overtime game. With 56 seconds left in the game, KCP was able to drive on Stephen Curry, the Warriors’ weakest defender. He got to the basket and made a 5-foot floater, got fouled and completed a 3-point play.
On the next possession, Kevin Durant got the ball after a screen that left Kyle Kuzma guarding him. On the court at that time, Kuzma was the Lakers’ worst defender and didn’t realize that all he needed to do was force Durant off the 3-point line. Instead, he gave Durant enough space to hit a 3-pointer that tied the game. In the next possession, Brandon Ingram tried to force his way into the paint against a double team, and turned the ball over.
After a Golden State miss and a Laker rebound, Los Angeles called time out with 5 seconds left. Guess what they didn’t do? If you thought to attack the weakest defensive player on the court for the Warriors, you might have a future as an NBA coach. At the very least, you watched Kyrie Irving do it in game 7 of the 2016 NBA Finals.
Instead, they gave the ball to Ingram (who admittedly was having one of the best games of his career while guarding and being guarded by Kevin Durant for a good portion of the game). He drove down the right side of the lane, guarded by a very good defensive player in Klay Thompson. As he got close to the rim, two other Warriors packed the paint and tried to block his shot. With more experience, Ingram would have seen the help defender and passed the ball to a wide open KCP in the right corner, or pulled up for a short jump shot when he felt Thompson leaning on him, resulting in either a trip to the free throw line, or a game winning basket. But the big question is why have a play designed that involves driving to the basket against the other team’s best perimeter defender and a sure challenge from a rim protector?
These are the kinds of in-game play calls a coach has to make. Luke Walton was able to do it while he was interim head coach of the Warriors. And Steve Kerr makes those calls as the Warriors coach.
For now, Walton has to focus just on teaching the young players the defensive systems and motivating the players to run hard on every play. Once he creates a solid foundation, the hope is that he will start to focus on offense by running plays, identifying opponent weaknesses and then finding mismatches his players can leverage.
Step 3: Finding an elite go-to guy
Every successful team has a go-to guy that can close out tight games. Even if he doesn’t make every shot, there has to be one elite talent on the team who can take the pressure off the others by getting a few baskets by himself in crunch time.
The Warriors have two MVP-level players who can take the last shot in Curry and Durant. And their third option is a guy who is a top-10 all-time 3-point dead eye. The Rockets have Harden and CP3 to make every big shot at the end of games. The Cavaliers have a force of nature in Lebron James. The same thing can be said about Boston, with Kyrie Irving, and San Antonio with Kawhi Leonard. Every team has an All-Star, or at least a former All-Star who knows how to find his spot on the court and make a pressure shot.
The Lakers will either have to develop one (possibly Kuzma, maybe Ingram) or bring in an All-Star to fill that role until the young guys reach their peak. For now, the Lakers takes turns playing the role, but none of them are good enough to do it on a regular enough basis to get them close games against elite teams or games they should win against weaker competition.
For the Lakers, their best hope in the immediate future would be a pick up a top free agent like Paul George (who has indicated he wants to play in his home town), as he would be a perfect fit for the current team. George would be the guy who can stop the opponent’s best scorer and at the same time hit a game winning shot. It would allow Brandon Ingram to create mismatches against most shooting guards and improve the defense to give more support to Kuzma.
Lebron James is also rumored to be headed to L.A., but I don’t think he will come as the fit isn’t as good for the team, and why would anyone want to leave the Eastern Conference and an automatic trip to the Finals?
Finally, there are a couple of elite centers who could transform the Lakers into a major contender in Demarcus Cousins and Anthony Davis. I’m not sold on Cousins’ maturity and lack of effort on defense, but players do grow. Remember when Zack Randolph was a loose cannon in Portland and for the Clippers? Having a two-way threat like Davis would be unbelievable. And unless New Orleans starts to win, he’s going to look for a better place to play in two years when he’s a free agent. Los Angeles could be a solid playoff team by then, so who knows? Besides it would be the most fantastic karmic payback, after the NBA screwed the Lakers over when David Stern vetoed the New Orleans trade that would have teamed up a young Chris Paul with a still elite Kobe Bryant.
No matter how it plays out, finding a go-to guy will make the Lakers a good to elite playoff team for years to come, and make them attractive to other free agents. At that point, it just becomes a matter of time before age and the salary cap catches up to teams like Golden State and Houston and the path opens up for others. And all anyone can ask for is to have a shot.
Just ask Lonzo Ball and Brandon Ingram.






