avatarLalita Lalwani

Summary

Interviews are a versatile business analysis technique that provide rich qualitative data but require careful planning and analysis due to their subjective nature and resource intensity.

Abstract

The article "Interviews — Conversations or Interrogations?" discusses the unpredictable nature of interviews, likening them to a cat on a hot tin roof. It emphasizes their importance as a business analysis tool for eliciting requirements, noting their ability to gather detailed information and explore underlying reasons behind situations or problems. Interviews can be conducted in various formats, including face-to-face, phone, or online, and can be structured, semi-structured, or unstructured. They offer flexibility, allowing for probing and adaptation during the conversation, and are effective for establishing rapport and observing non-verbal cues. However, they are also time-consuming, subject to bias, and challenging to generalize. The article provides real-life examples of how business analysts use interviews to understand customer experiences and evaluate systems, highlighting the need for careful planning, execution, and analysis to ensure validity and reliability.

Opinions

  • Interviews are acknowledged as one of the most effective business analysis techniques for requirements elicitation.
  • The article suggests that interviews can be as unpredictable as they are insightful, with the potential to shift from discussing analytical skills to explaining abstract concepts like why one would be a carrot if they were a vegetable.
  • The strengths of interviews are highlighted, including their richness and depth of qualitative data, the ability to explore underlying reasons, and the flexibility to adapt questions based on responses.
  • The personal and interactive nature of interviews is seen as beneficial for building rapport and trust, as well as for observing interviewees' body language and emotions.
  • Weaknesses such as the time-consuming nature of interviews, scheduling difficulties, subjectivity, and challenges in generalizing results are also recognized.
  • The article implies that interviews must be carefully planned and analyzed to mitigate their limitations and that multiple interviews may be necessary to obtain a representative sample.
  • Real-life examples illustrate the practical application of interviews in various business contexts, from online retail to healthcare and banking, showcasing different methods of data analysis and reporting.

Interviews — Conversations or Interrogations?

Interviews can be as unpredictable as a cat on a hot tin roof. One moment you’re discussing your analytical skills, the next you’re explaining why you’d be a carrot if you were a vegetable. 🥕

Christina @ wocintechchat.com on Unsplash

Ever walked into an interview room, feeling like a gladiator entering the Colosseum? Well, you’re not alone, dear Business Analysts. 🏟️

Interviews can be daunting whether getting interviewed for a position or interviewing the stakeholders for requirements. However, this is one of the most effective business analysis techniques for the requirements elicitation. Let’s see how to use this technique effectively.

One of the most common and effective techniques for business analysis is conducting interviews with stakeholders, customers, users, or experts. Interviews can help to gather valuable information, insights, opinions, and feedback that can inform the analysis and guide the decision making.

Interviews can be conducted in different ways, such as face-to-face, over the phone, or online. They can also be structured, semi-structured, or unstructured, depending on the level of flexibility and direction that the analyst wants to have.

Strengths of Interviews

Interviews have many strengths as a business analysis technique. Some of them are:

  • Interviews are rich and detailed. We can collect qualitative data that is not easily captured by other methods, such as surveys or observations.
  • It is easy to explore the underlying reasons, causes, and effects of a situation or a problem.
  • This technique allow the interviewee to express their thoughts and feelings in their own words when asked open-ended questions. For example, we can ask them to describe a scenario, tell a story, or give an example.
  • Interviews can allow for flexibility and adaptability in the questioning process. The interviewer can tailor the questions to the specific situation, context, and goals of the interview.
  • The interviewer can also probe deeper into the responses, ask for clarifications, or explore new topics that emerge during the conversation. For example, ask follow-up questions, probe deeper into a topic, or skip irrelevant questions.
  • Interviews are personal and interactive and hence is a great way to establish rapport and trust with the interviewee and encourage them to share their honest and candid opinions.
  • It provides opportunity to observe their body language, tone of voice, and emotions, which can provide valuable clues about their attitudes, preferences, and motivations. For example, it can be easily detected if they are enthusiastic, bored, confused, or frustrated by their answers or expressions.

Weaknesses of Interviews

However, interviews also have some weaknesses that need to be considered. Some of them are:

  • Interviews are time-consuming and resource-intensive. It requires planning, preparing, conducting, recording, transcribing, analyzing, and reporting the interviews.
  • Schedule is another challenge as getting time for the interviews with the interviewees can be difficult if they are busy or unavailable. Moreover, we need to conduct multiple interviews to ensure that we have a representative sample of the population or the group we are studying. For example, there might be a need to interview several customers from different segments or regions to understand their needs and expectations.
  • Interviews are subjective and biased. Interviewee’s responses can be influenced by choice of words, tone of voice, body language, or facial expressions. We may also interpret the interviewee’s responses based on our own assumptions, beliefs, or expectations. Furthermore, the interviewee may not be truthful or accurate in their answers due to social desirability bias (the tendency to give answers that are favorable or acceptable to others), memory bias (the tendency to recall or forget information selectively), or other factors. For example, they may exaggerate their satisfaction with a product or service to avoid offending us or hurting our feelings.
  • Interviews are difficult to generalize and compare. We may not be able to apply the findings from one interview to another context or situation because of the uniqueness and diversity of each interviewee’s experiences and perspectives.
  • It is also troublesome to compare the results from different interviews because of the variability and inconsistency in the questions asked, the answers given, and the methods used. For example, we may not be able to draw conclusions about the overall performance of a process or a system based on the feedback from a few individuals who have used it.

Real-Life Examples of Interviews

  • A business analyst working for an online retailer wants to understand how customers use their website and mobile app to shop for products. He conducts semi-structured interviews with 20 customers who have recently made a purchase from the company. He asks them about their goals, preferences, behaviors, challenges, and suggestions for improvement. He records and transcribes the interviews using an audio recorder and a transcription software. He analyzes the data using thematic analysis (a method of identifying and organizing themes or patterns in qualitative data). He reports his findings using quotes from the interviewees to illustrate his points.
  • A business analyst working for a healthcare organization wants to evaluate the effectiveness of a new electronic health record (EHR) system that has been implemented in a hospital. She conducts structured interviews with 10 doctors who have used the system for at least six months. She asks them about their satisfaction, productivity, quality of care, usability issues, and training needs. She uses a Likert scale (a type of rating scale that measures attitudes or opinions) to quantify their responses. She analyzes the data using descriptive statistics (a method of summarizing and displaying numerical data). She reports her findings using charts and graphs to show the distribution and frequency of responses.
  • A business analyst working on a project for a bank to improve the customer service process. They interview several customer service representatives to understand their pain points, challenges, and suggestions. One of them told them that they often had to deal with angry and frustrated customers who complained about the long waiting time on the phone. He said that he wished there was a way to reduce the call volume or provide some self-service options for the customers. This gave business analyst an idea to propose a chat-bot solution that could answer some of the frequently asked questions and direct the customers to the right channel.

As we can see, interviews are a powerful tool for business analysis. They can provide valuable information that can help the analyst to understand the situation, define the problem, and propose solutions. However, they also require careful planning, execution, and analysis to ensure their validity and reliability.

If you enjoyed this blog post then don’t forget to subscribe to my blog and follow me for more tips and tricks on business analysis. Please leave in the comment for any questions and feedback.

Also, don’t forget to clap (you can clap 50 times) or buy me a coffee!

Until next time keep watching this space for more Business Analysis Techniques!

Interview
Product Management
Product Development
Product
Communication
Recommended from ReadMedium