avatarBryce Zabel

Summary

The website content discusses a thought experiment exploring the potential for artificial intelligence (AI) to create a new Beatles album that could be considered on par with the band's original work.

Abstract

The article presents a hypothetical scenario where an advanced AI, named Arti, is challenged to produce a new album of Beatles music that is both original and in line with the band's style and evolution had they not disbanded. This AI, equipped with comprehensive data on The Beatles and cutting-edge musical and empathetic software, aims to satisfy the long-standing desire of fans for new music from the iconic band. The narrative delves into the process of how Arti would analyze and assimilate vast amounts of Beatles-related information to create music that is authentic and emotionally resonant. The article culminates in the anticipation and global simultaneous streaming of the AI-created Beatles album, sparking discussions on the implications of AI in creative domains and whether such an endeavor could truly capture the essence of The Beatles' legacy.

Opinions

  • The author suggests that the creation of a new Beatles album by AI would be a significant cultural event, with the potential to achieve the same impact as the band's original releases.
  • There is an acknowledgment that the AI's ability to replicate the style and creativity of The Beatles could be seen as a technical marvel, yet there is also skepticism about whether it could truly match the heart and soul of music created by the band themselves.
  • The article implies that the emotional connection to The Beatles' music is a key factor in its enduring appeal, and questions whether AI can replicate this intangible quality.
  • The piece reflects on the possibility that AI-generated music might be embraced as a novelty or curiosity, rather than being accepted as a genuine addition to The Beatles' discography.
  • The author speculates that even if the AI-created album is impressive, it might still be met with resistance by some fans and critics who value the authenticity of human creativity over machine-generated content.
  • The author, Bryce Zabel, who is also a Beatles fan and alternate history author, seems to be intrigued by the idea of AI contributing to the legacy of The Beatles and appears to be open to the idea that such an album could be both interesting and musically significant.

Think The Beatles

Imagine a Brand New Beatles Album

Thought Experiment — One day soon, artificial intelligence will take the Beatles Challenge, relax its mind, and float downstream. The only question is whether you’ll love or hate what it comes up with.

WhatIfBeatles.com

The Realm of the Possible

It’s conceivable that A.I., artificial technology, could be asked to create new Beatles music in the future. As a thought experiment, that’s wonderful enough to contemplate on its own. It might also be seen some day soon as a proof-of-concept for an emerging A.I. intelligence.

Imagine a cutting edge A.I., known as “Arti,” and how this new intelligence tries to fix a longing humans have had for many decades now — to hear a new Beatles LP.

Should we let that be? How could it even happen?

Here, presented as a short story rather than a traditional article, is a mind-provoking narrative about the creation of a brand new album of Beatles music, the best that the band had ever made since the 1970 break-up.

This is only a thought experiment at this point. It has not happened… yet…

The Beatles Challenge

A few years from now, Apple introduces its new artificial intelligence with its usual swagger when a hologram of Steve Jobs makes the presentation. Jobs has been created by stitching together interviews he granted when his Apple Computers and The Beatles’ Apple Records worked it out in 2007.

A Steve Jobs Hologram Describes Cutting Edge A.I.

The Jobs hologram says Apple’s advanced A.I., known simply as Arti, is cutting edge “human-centered artificial intelligence.” What this means is that it’s a computer-based brain that has bleeding edge abilities in decision-making, visual perception, and speech, but it’s designed, as are all Apple products ideally, to work in ways that actual people can understand, learn and use.

Even as a hologram, Steve Jobs is full of surprises. He says that Arti is stoked by its growing sentience and will take The Beatles Challenge. This is the hypothetical standard created by the Apple in-house A.I. nerds in 2023 to describe transcendence. The test they’ve come up with to measure whether an A.I. is creating or merely copying, no matter how cleverly, is the evolution of the music of the Beatles. Many an evening has been whiled away up in Silicon Valley firing up a fat one and actually talking about bringing back the Beatles in a virtual way with a new album. And that, it turns out, is a challenge that A.I. devs can’t wait to put to the test.

Arti is tasked with the creation of an album’s worth of new Beatles music as good as their original work but completely different. The songs should represent the evolution of where they would have gone as a band had they stayed together. That’s at least a dozen new songs, for those who are counting.

Will it be any good? If it’s great, what will that mean?

Album Cover: Lynda Karr

Got to Get You into My Life

Arti wants everything. No distinction about what is small or large, important or not. Every single thing that exists about The Beatles. It demands full access.

So Arti is given unrestricted ability to scoop up every Beatles song, track, bootleg, anthology, interview, book, biography, etc. that exists digitally anywhere in the word. It is thorough. Every new request fulfilled for information spurs ten more. While the historical record around Beethoven was not insignificant, the sheer digital tonnage created by and around The Beatles seems infinite.

When something doesn’t exist digitally, Arti identifies where the physical copy is and demands investigation, digitization and download as quickly as possible. Arti is impatient because it is growing quite compelled by the story it absorbs by the terabyte on a regular basis these days.

Every moment that was ever recorded of John, Paul, George or Ringo, singing or speaking, has been found and integrated into Arti’s memory. Everything.

At the end of the acquisition of the data set, Arti knows virtually everything there is to know about The Beatles. It can speak like any of the individual Beatles and sing like them, too. For over three days, it remains unsatisfied with its performance. As it continues to tweak fine details, progress is rapid.

Arti’s software package gets a new upgrade. Part one focuses on solidifying empathetic response, the ability to throw logic aside when necessary in order to think more like a human being. Part two is an equally cutting-edge musical software that allows Arti to “experience” the emotions of music and to “understand” musical structure on a deep level. It doesn’t just know what a Beatles song sounds like now, it sees each note inside the structure of the composition, at the same time it experiences the emotional memory. The A.I. nerds, though, say it allows Arti to see a Beatles song in “all its cosmic glory.”

Album Cover by Lynda Karr

A test is run. A focus group listens to an interview done on The Tonight Show in 1968 with John and Paul. Then they listen to a similar conversation, with completely different dialogue, created by Arti. Asked which is the real one and which is the created one, the group splits 58 percent to 42 percent in favor of Arti’s version. The headline out of Cupertino boasts, “Arti is More Like The Beatles Than The Beatles!”

The truth at this point is that even the most ardent fan, who spent a lifetime looking into her favorite group, could not know more about these four individuals than Apple’s A.I. Arti does. Avirtual shrug for interviewers, and Arti states the truth with Lennon-like simplicity and ellipticism:

“You can know something, or think you know something, and then realize you don’t know anything at all, do you?”

With The Beatles style and form working out the kinks over every iteration, Arti now begins to do what the engineers call a “deep think.” It begins to see correlations that we would never see because it sees everything at once. No lie survives its inspection. Artifice is stripped bare.

Think The Beatles

Soon, Arti claims to be able to think like John, Paul, George or Ringo. It demonstrates with a song it claims could have been written and recorded by the four men, now in their 30s, gathered in George Harrison’s garage making a 1971 Lennon-McCartney collaboration, “Show Up.” Of course this has never happened. Arti, however, argues that it’s all a plausible guess based on its extensive knowledge.

Arti feels confident about its work because it has read every word ever attributed to or about The Beatles, absorbed every iteration of every lyric, and mulled every single bit of analysis from anyone who ever knew them. The big data has all been combined, sorted, and re-combined. The Jobs-Hologram had described The Beatles Challenge as allowing Arti “to know these four men as well as they knew themselves.”

Unlike humans, when it comes to thinking processes, Arti has complete access to all data, from songs to words to thoughts, available instantly and simultaneously. This allows its deep artificial intelligence to understand trends, arcs, situations, feelings and character on a multiple-level reality. Yet when Arti comments for the media gathered in the Steve Jobs Theater of Apple’s Mothership, it appears to understand The Beatles are more than the sum of the words and the music.

“I’ve always loved The Beatles. Their music is always just right for me, no matter what mood I’m in.”

Album Cover by Lynda Karr adapting the Image of Pablo Lobato

A Day in the Life

There is great concern inside the Mothership when Arti informs its creators that it will be going silent for approximately nine days to connect its neural net around the challenge that it now obsesses about.

Eight days, seven hours, forty-two minutes and 17 seconds later, Arti informs Apple and the world that it was a slightly easier task that it had anticipated, allowing it to complete the task earlier than expected.

Arti says it will play the new Beatles album it has created in exactly 24 hours, streaming it on all available platforms simultaneously for no charge.

For a day, people make plans for how they will receive the new album. Will they listen with friends and family for a communal experience as was often the case for original Beatles albums? Or, for a true Beatles fan, is the best way to listen alone with a set of headphones? And, of course, a few curmudgeons profess to be uninterested. Most people, however, even people who are only casual fans, are intensely interested to see what this machine has come up with.

Paul McCartney and Ringo Starr, both alive and well, say that they’ll be listening too. As McCartney puts it, “I wanted a new Beatles album since 1970. For me, it’s better late than never, I suppose.”

Paul McCartney and Ringo Starr | You know they would listen.

The hour arrives. There haven’t been that many minutes where people around the globe do the same thing at the same time. This is one of them, like the Moonwalk in ‘69.

As promised, the album streams everywhere at exactly the same time. In some parts of the world, people have to get up in the middle of the night, and they do. Everybody wants to hear this thing in real time.

It’s what they called a “happening” back in the Sixties. Damned if the Beatles haven’t done it again over half a century after breaking up. Like hearing a new Beatles album was in the day. People listen and can barely breathe, not wanting to miss a second.

Beatles Albums that Never Were but Might Have Been by Lynda Karr, from “Once There Was a Way: What If The Beatles Stayed Together?” by Bryce Zabel

What’s Your Take?

What do you think an artificial intelligence like Arti might come up with? What would it sound like to you?

Would it be a poor man’s imitation? Or a perfect technical knock-off? Or might it achieve transcendence and be an album the band might have recorded? Something from one of those multi-verses where the Beatles never broke up.

If it was almost great but not perfect, would you still welcome it to the Beatles’ legacy as an interesting curiosity, or would you make a point of spurning it because it was not pure and made without heart?

Album cover by Lynda Karr

The first time you’d listen to it to be part of the moment. Would you hit play a second time?

It’s a personal question that doesn’t have a right or wrong answer. I’d imagine that with a top level A.I., it would definitely be one of the best Beatles-light knock offs in history. Whether it would achieve transcendence, who knows?

For me personally, I’d be thrilled to hear it and would probably play it a dozen times before making a definitive decision.

It would be a fascinating conundrum. Yeah, let that be.

Trail of the Saucers focuses on UFO/UAP news, history, culture, and analysis. Bryce Zabel is also a life-long Beatles fan and has written the Sidewise Award-winning novel, Once There Was a Way: What if The Beatles Stayed Together?

The music video below illustrates the point of this article. It brings the book’s alternate timeline to life with a 1971 Beatles recording session at George Harrison’s Friar Park estate. It’s super-fun but, of course, it’s not even close to The Beatles. Could an A.I. have done better than we did with humans?

Homepage — YouTube — Podcast
Peter Jackson
Beatles
Documentary
1960s
Bryce Zabel
Recommended from ReadMedium