avatarStephenie Magister ✨

Summary

The article reflects on the moral implications of supporting the GOP despite its policies that are harmful to queer people, drawing parallels to historical instances where individuals supported oppressive regimes without personal animosity but became complicit in their actions.

Abstract

The author discusses the ethical dilemma faced by individuals who align with the GOP, a party perceived to have transphobic and anti-queer stances, suggesting that historians may judge such support harshly. Despite the lack of overt hate, the article argues that actions taken in support of the GOP contribute to harm against queer individuals. It references Hillary Clinton's "baskets of deplorables" comment and AR Moxy's blog post "Sky," which liken modern conservative support to those who joined the Nazi party for reasons other than hatred but were nonetheless labeled as such by history. The piece calls for introspection among queer individuals and allies to move beyond fear and complicity, advocating for a united front to create a more inclusive future.

Opinions

  • The author believes that supporting the GOP, despite personal intentions, aligns individuals with policies that harm queer people, which is akin to historical examples of complicity in oppression.
  • The article suggests that voters who supported the GOP in 2016 and 2020, despite its anti-queer policies, are complicit in the harm caused to the queer community.
  • It posits that economic anxiety, a desire for patriotism, or other non-hate-based motivations do not absolve one from the consequences of supporting harmful policies.
  • The author emphasizes that history will not look kindly on those who supported the GOP, similar to how Germans who joined the Nazi party are viewed today.
  • The piece encourages the queer community and its allies to overcome fear and inaction, to not repeat the mistakes of the past, and to work together to fight for a more inclusive and accepting society.
  • It criticizes the notion of making excuses for Trump supporters and instead advocates for focusing on the impact of their political choices.
  • The article calls for a shift in strategy

If You Joined The GOP But Don’t Hate Queer People...

Historians Will Have A Word For You

Photo by Europeana on Unsplash

Do queer lives matter? If so, why don’t we act like it?

In 2016, sixty-three million people, complacently or enthusiastically or ignorantly, aligned themselves with transphobia.

In 2020, seventy-four million people aligned themselves yet again with the same candidate and political party that spent the last four years making their positions toward women, queer people, and people of color as blinding as a red-colored sky.

What the **** happened?

Almost no one hates trans people, at least not in the way we talk about hate as a hateful impact based on hateful intentions. People take actions that have a harmful and often deadly impact toward trans people, but those actions aren’t usually motivated by hate.

They also aren’t usually motivated by the internalized transphobia everyone struggles to overcome — even trans people.

Baskets of deplorable queer haters

Remember that famous “baskets of deplorables” comment? Often quoted but just-as-often misrepresented, the remark argued that people voting for the GOP weren’t doing so because they supported GOP policies and their harmful impact toward queer people.

They were doing so because the government had let them down (Washington Monthly).

Conservative candidates promised to disrupt a system that had failed them. Overwhelmingly, white men recognized they would be relatively untouched by conservative policies that hurt queer people but promised birth, transformation, and resurrection.

Fighting back was always going to include collateral damage, but disrupting the system would eventually help everyone. Even the people it hurt.

History recorded the same seductive promise in World War II.

What word will historians have for modern conservatives?

In his famously-quoted (but less-often cited) blog post “Sky,” AR Moxy wrote:

Historians have a word for Germans who joined the Nazi party, not because they hated Jews, but out of a hope for restored patriotism, or a sense of economic anxiety, or a hope to preserve their religious values, or dislike of their opponents, or raw political opportunism, or convenience, or ignorance, or greed.

That word is “Nazi.” Nobody cares about their motives anymore.

They joined what they joined. They lent their support and their moral approval. And, in so doing, they bound themselves to everything that came after. Who cares any more what particular knot they used in the binding?

The moral arc of silent complicity

Photo by Europana on Unsplash

In 2016, sixty-three million people, complacently or enthusiastically or ignorantly, aligned themselves with transphobia.

In 2020, seventy-four million people aligned themselves yet again with the same transphobia.

Those voters became complicit in harming and killing trans people in order to thumb their nose at the system.

Voters remain complicit.

They showed the world that it was okay to sacrifice trans people if it made the world a better place.

It’s going to be our job to show them otherwise.

The future is a rainbow-colored sky

Photo by guy stevens on Unsplash

If you, like me, are queer, there is still the great danger of complicity. Not through apathy, but through the inaction of fear. Our safety is already fragile. How can we ask each other to risk what we barely get to touch?

But while we have all been hurt in different ways, we have also healed in different ways. And now? Now we are all strong in different ways.

A call to action

In his final days, Chadwick Boseman/Black Panther spoke to a graduating class at Howard University to remind them that one lost battle is not a lost war. And just so, even when you win, the fight must continue.

Sometimes you need to get knocked down before you can really figure out what your fight is and how need to fight it.

When I dared to challenge the system that would relegate us to victims and stereotypes with no clear historical backgrounds, no hopes or talents, when I questioned that method of portrayal, a different path opened up for me, the path to my destiny.

We’ve made our suffering clear. Facts and feelings were never going to change conservative hearts and minds.

What we can do is stop trying to change and control people who were never within our power to change anyway.

What we can do is let go of the very strategies that would turn us into the people we are fighting.

What we can do instead is work together as a diverse community full of imperfect allies.

We are a people who have dreamed of a rainbow-colored sky. Let us work together in order to make it real.

Additional reading

Note: this article is a playful (yet insightful!) homage to AR Maxon’s “Sky” blog post

Conservatives Are Cruel Because Cruelty Is Their Point (An Injustice)

Stop Making Excuses for Trump Supporters (Washington Monthly)

After many moons passing with no one quite sure where the “Historians have a word for you” quote came from… (Twitter)

Politics
History
LGBTQ
Life
Culture
Recommended from ReadMedium