avatarMatt Inman

Summary

The article provides strategies for employees to effectively navigate and benefit from the annual performance review process.

Abstract

As the year concludes, employees often face the daunting task of the annual performance review, a process that many find outdated and irrelevant due to its infrequent feedback cycle. The article acknowledges the widespread dissatisfaction with traditional performance appraisals, noting that feedback is often too late to be actionable and that outcomes may seem predetermined. Despite moves by some companies to revise or abandon performance reviews, employees must still prepare for them this year. The article suggests working within the system by documenting achievements, using psychological negotiation tactics like anchoring, and engaging in team reviews to accurately reflect individual and collective performance. It also encourages providing constructive feedback to managers and fostering a continuous feedback loop to improve the manager-employee relationship.

Opinions

  • The author believes that the annual performance review is an outdated method that fails to provide timely and actionable feedback.
  • There is a sentiment that the review process is flawed, with many employees feeling that their self-evaluation is an exercise in justifying their existence rather than a true measure of their contributions.
  • The article suggests that employees should take control of their career progression by strategically presenting their accomplishments and seeking regular feedback outside of the formal review process.
  • The author implies that managers often have a preconceived notion of an employee's ranking and salary increase before the review even begins, contributing to employee disenchantment.
  • The article encourages employees to give themselves the highest score in self-assessments to leverage the psychological principle of anchoring, setting a high starting point for negotiations.
  • Team reviews are recommended as a way to identify collective strengths and weaknesses, leading to improved team dynamics and more focused training needs.
  • Providing feedback to managers is presented as a way to foster a culture of open communication and mutual growth, with the caveat that employees should be cautious and considerate when offering upward feedback.
  • The author expresses a desire for a leadership method that involves regular evaluations and consistent feedback, suggesting that such a system would be more inspiring and beneficial for employees.

How to Survive the Annual Performance Review

Give yourself a 5 out of 5

Photo by Headway on Unsplash

As the end of the year approaches, it’s coming to that time we all love to hate. The day your manager is required to call you into a room and have a somewhat awkward conversation. Yes, I’m talking about the annual performance review.

As you look through notes, try to recall the goals you set months ago, feeling the need to justify your actions to continue getting a paycheck. But when was the last time you benefited from the review process?

We’ve all been there. And a small percentage of you actually enjoy the process. So if you are in that small group, I’m going to let you off the hook. You can stop reading now. Move on to another article, Medium’s homepage is a great place to start.

OK, now that it’s just you and me, let’s talk about why so many companies fail at the process.

Performance Reviews

Your manager, like a coach, needs to provide direction and criticism. If you were playing a sport, how would you do if the coach only gave you feedback during the last game of the season, and that feedback was to tell you how bad you played during the first game? How relevant would the information be if it was 20 games old? or 50 games?

That’s what most of us feel like is happening. By the time we get the appraisal, the issues are ancient history. The problems have either been resolved or are far in the past, making the feedback feel like an afterthought.

It often seems even before we go into the process, the organization has pre-determined the ranking we’ll get along with the pay increase. Managers have even admitted to me; this is the way it works in their organizations. It’s no wonder we feel so disenchanted.

Then there are the reviews themselves. The responsibility is put on the employee to evaluate themself. There are indeed better ways to determine a person’s value than having them recall every detail from the past year. To give themselves a ranking from 1 to 5 on their proficiency, then writing a justification why they deserve that rank.

We know there are problems with the system, and companies are making some headway in changing, or even removing, the performance review. But I’m sorry you will not escape it this year. What can you do to better prepare for the assessment? Here are a few tips to help.

Working the system

Much like the American education system, the performance review is an antiquated measure from a different time. The workforce that it provided feedback for has long since left the US. But we still “grade” employees through its use.

Like the education system, we adapt to how it works in practice, instead of how it should work in principle. And unfortunately, that means you will have to play the system to get the desired output.

Talk yourself up

Consider making yourself look as amazing as possible. Expand on the work you have done, have it sound like it was the best outcome for everyone involved.

This can be difficult for many of us. We feel that our jobs aren’t as crucial as other members of the team. We think of what we do as a skill that anyone has. We often don’t consider how those items we know well are going to benefit our coworkers. Take the time to consider this and document that in your review.

If you aren’t currently doing it, consider starting a journal to write down accomplishments as the year progresses. Your future self will thank you for it.

Give yourself 5 out of 5

If your performance appraisal has a ranking system, give yourself the highest score and make management talk you down. This is a common psychology trick to negotiating called anchoring. It creates a cognitive bias in a person that they will refer back to in future judgments. Set the bar high, and they will be more apt to work from that bar.

Unless you sit at your desk and surf the web all day, your job makes a difference to people. Your leadership manages multiple people, remind them of the things you do for others. Ask people you work with on projects to give you feedback. Most people are happy to provide you with input. Use those in your justification.

Prepare as a team

One of the things we did as a team was to work through our reviews together. We blocked off time and met without our manager, and went through the review process with each other. We helped one another out by recalling specific situations where other team members excelled during the year.

Team reviews can also be a great way to find the strengths and weaknesses, leading to better dynamics and better separation of duties. It might also suggest an area of training that people may need in the coming year.

Review your manager

Consider putting a few comments together to give to your manager. They should be kind and constructive. You could list a few areas they excelled during the year and a place or two they may need to work through.

Some people are receptive to it. Others aren’t. You will need to use your judgment on making this call. I would challenge you to consider that if your leadership isn’t open to feedback, consider making some changes at your job.

Conclusion

Writing this piece made me feel a little discouraged. I believe that most of us want to do good work and get rewarded for it. But the review system in many companies is created to do the opposite of inspiring people. We then have to find the cracks in the system, the gray areas to work in, to create a review that reflects us at our best.

If you are like the majority of workers, you are probably doing a fantastic job. Unfortunately, the review process has failed so many of us to the degree that the annual review is a time for anxiety and stress. Suppose we could look to a new leadership method, one where you are evaluated regularly and consistently receiving feedback. Consider how that would change the manager/employee dynamic.

In the end, it’s up to you to take those first steps. There is no better person to be in charge of your career than you. Take the initiative to set up a regular meeting with your manager. Build up the dialogue, trust, and feedback loop. If you’re lucky, maybe next year you can be the one to skip reading this article.

Personal Development
Leadership
Self Improvement
Productivity
Business
Recommended from ReadMedium