avatarElisabeth Friedl

Summary

The provided web content discusses the challenges scientists face in the field of nutritional science due to misinformation and fear-mongering on social media, emphasizing the complexity of nutritional research and the need for public trust in science.

Abstract

The article "How Social Media Undermines Scientists" delves into the intricate nature of nutritional science, highlighting the dedication of scientists who work tirelessly to advance our understanding of food and health. It criticizes the media and social platforms for exploiting public fear and confusion to undermine scientific credibility, often oversimplifying complex issues for sensationalism. The author argues that the portrayal of science as corrupt or inconclusive leads to a loss of trust, despite the integrity and rigor of most scientists. The piece calls for better science communication to combat misinformation and restore the public's faith in scientific research, acknowledging the challenges of conveying the nuanced nature of scientific findings.

Opinions

  • Scientists are portrayed as selfless individuals committed to the pursuit of knowledge for the greater good, not personal gain.
  • The media is accused of using sensationalism and emotional manipulation, particularly fear, to engage the public rather than presenting factual, nuanced scientific information.
  • The author expresses frustration with the public's tendency to seek simple answers and quick solutions to complex nutritional questions, which is exploited by media outlets.
  • There is a call to recognize the complexity of nutritional science and the fact that not all answers are clear-cut or immediately available.
  • The article suggests that the integrity of scientists is often undermined by politically and financially motivated interests, not by the scientists themselves.
  • The author vouches for the honesty and dedication of scientists, emphasizing that falsifying results would be contrary to their principles and detrimental to their work.
  • The piece points out biases in scientific publishing and the influence of funding sources but distinguishes these as issues separate from the integrity of scientists.
  • The author advocates for improved science marketing and communication strategies to counteract the spread of misinformation and regain public trust.
  • The author criticizes the culture of quick, uninformed opinions on nutrition, asserting that reading a few articles does not make one an expert in the field.

NUTRITIONAL SCIENCE

How Social Media Undermines Scientists

And misuses your fear to get attention

Scientists work hard every day, conducting Sisyphean experiments to confirm or refute scientific questions. Not for themselves (well, a little bit, since they’re getting paid for it), but for the bigger picture. They’re doing it to solve questions regarding life, aging, medicine, food, environment, and you. Especially you, because your life wouldn’t be anywhere near the way it is right now without science.

It’s not easy, it’s not black and white and those questions can’t always be answered with a clear this is good and this is bad. Scientists know how unsatisfying this is for the population, as people like having clear answers and instructions. But I promise you, they’re doing their utmost.

Photo by ThisisEngineering RAEng on Unsplash

The constant hollow talk of politically and financially influenced science, corruption and lies, which may be true in a few cases, destroys the credibility of each and every scientist. But it simply is not true all the time. But as soon as something gets controversial or uncomfortable — it must be flawed science.

The media is taking advantage of the fact that people are lost.

Unfortunately, it’s the main argument of those who otherwise have no valid points and who refer to it again and again, to polarize and confuse, instead of giving profound explanations themselves. They prefer taking advantage of the fact that people are lost and don’t know what to believe. Science doesn’t offer them a safe haven anymore. Science is too opaque, a pledged community, all animal testing and cruelty, and only lies in the end. We need to change our image to regain peoples trust.

I personally vouch for scientist. Let alone for the fact that it takes a very specific personality to be one and it makes them the most trustworthy human beings I can imagine. Those people are accurate, analytical, rational, sincere, honest, self-sacrificing, and perfectionist. Faking a result wouldn’t even come to their mind, since it would undermine their credibility and everything they’ve worked for, making their hours crouching in the lab point- and worthless. No scientist would do that to him(or her)self.

Of course, there are biases — negative results that are not as important as positive ones, publishing bias by certain major journals, partiality, and of course the overall question of where did the money come from. But it’s neither science nor scientist that are flawed. It’s politics and capitalism.

Instead of facts, the media is fighting with emotions — with people’s fears.

The major problem is science marketing. We just don’t sell very well. Science is one of the hardest things to convey to people and the media doesn’t have our back. Instead, they’re rooting against us, with unfair means. Because instead of facts, they fight with emotions — with people’s fears, with your fears. And science has nothing to counter them, we’re powerless, with boring theses that can neither be confirmed nor properly refuted, and that are just too complex to explain. Media offers a short cut, a simple solution, like junk food. They bring quick satisfaction and you feel good because maybe you no longer eat gluten, avoid red meat or drink oat milk. They make you feel special because you’re the one thinking differently, you’re not mainstream. You’re thinking ahead, you’re smart. But you’re not. Reading about a topic for three minutes doesn’t make you smart or well-informed. That’s a dangerous fallacy.

Yes, we all eat and we all have opinions about our food. But food is actually a science, and a highly complex one at that. However, nutritional science is a new branch of science and goes back less than 100 years, unlike medicine or physics. Not everything is set in stone yet. In addition, it’s so complex that it’s impossible even for scientists to grasp everything, to consider all facts that might play a role. You can’t just read an article or two or even ten, call yourself an expert, and profess that you’ve solved every nutritional issue. It’s just f*** not that simple. And everyone who’s offering a final solution, an easy way out, claiming that one thing is right and the other is wrong — is a liar.

All I know is just what I read in the papers, and that’s an alibi for my ignorance. (Will Rogers)

Are you looking for a source for simple but science-based information about nutrition? Check out my publication, follow or simply buy me a coffee to support my work. Thank you!

Science
Nutrition
Science Communication
Research
Media
Recommended from ReadMedium