avatarFernando Lopes

Free AI web copilot to create summaries, insights and extended knowledge, download it at here

3902

Abstract

only, some have video only, and some have both video and audio. And also they’re available in multiple formats. For video there is AVC (which is apparently H.254), VP09, and AV01. And for audio there’s Mp4a and Opus. I don’t know what Opus is but apparently it is noticeably better than Mp4a. So if you’ve ever gone to a YouTube download page and seen a million download options that’s why. Although I hide the redundant ones and just display the one with the lowest file size at that quality level (usually VP09 or AV01).</p><p id="b96b">It’s actually pretty cool to see AV01 as I talked about it <a href="https://readmedium.com/why-apple-adding-av1-support-is-a-big-deal-faa46a356f3c">here</a>. And it does compress videos a little better than VP09 and a lot better than AVC.</p><p id="d170">Also apparently YouTube does something called DRC, dynamic range compression (Not Democratic Republic of Congo). It makes the quiet sections louder and the loud sections quieter. Apparently people really hate it and I guess there must be a way to disable it because I have not been able to find a music video with DRC enabled. I’ve never heard anyone talk about this before though.</p><p id="e027">So now that we have the formats we can just download them. Each format has a download link oddly enough. I did not expect that. Just keep in mind that the YouTube download links expire in 6 hours.</p><p id="3fc9">Of course here we run into a problem. When I saw this I was like, “Great, let’s just download an audio-only track if we only want audio or a video+audio track if we want video.”</p> <figure id="dd49"> <div> <div> <img class="ratio" src="http://placehold.it/16x9"> <iframe class="" src="https://cdn.embedly.com/widgets/media.html?src=https%3A%2F%2Fgiphy.com%2Fembed%2FMvioOPqhOm6b4BI0FQ%2Ftwitter%2Fiframe&amp;display_name=Giphy&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fgiphy.com%2Fgifs%2Ffallontonight-jimmy-fallon-tonight-show-MvioOPqhOm6b4BI0FQ&amp;image=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia0.giphy.com%2Fmedia%2Fv1.Y2lkPTc5MGI3NjExa203NTd1dnVhNGpveHByMmxsOGRzZGxsejhsZzh2Zjk5N20xMTYwbSZlcD12MV9pbnRlcm5hbF9naWZfYnlfaWQmY3Q9Zw%2FMvioOPqhOm6b4BI0FQ%2Fgiphy.gif&amp;key=a19fcc184b9711e1b4764040d3dc5c07&amp;type=text%2Fhtml&amp;schema=giphy" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="435" width="435"> </div> </div> </figure></iframe></div></div></figure><p id="9eda">If you do that you’re restricted to at most 720p 30fps. Or so I’m told. I haven’t been able to find a file with both video and audio over 360p. And some videos don’t have any video+audio tracks at all. So that means we’re going to have to download a video file and an audio file (preferably without DRC) and merge them together.</p><p id="e01b">And this is perhaps the first really big problem I ran into. If I was doing this locally it would not be that big of a problem because there’s a nice command line package called <code>FFmpeg</code> that will just do it for you. Unfortunately it’s a bit more complicated when you’re working with Node.js because you have to do a bunch of file manipulation stuff.</p><p id="12d8">I ended up deciding to just download the files from Google’s servers separately and then merge them locally. Apparently Flutter has a package called <code>FFmpeg-kit</code> that will do this. Unfortunately it only works on Android, iOS, and MacOS.</p><p id="fdbf">Although Android will not be getting YouTube downloading because Google is really strict about that.</p> <figure id="eaa2"> <div> <div> <img class="ratio" src="http://placehold.it/16x9"> <iframe class="" src="https://cdn.embedly.com/widgets/media.html?type=text%2Fhtml&amp;key=a19fcc184b9711e1b4764040d3dc5c07&amp;schema=twitter&amp;url=https%3A//twitter.com/EzraDuown/status/1776352074449530961/&amp;image=" a

Options

llowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="281" width="500"> </div> </div> </figure></iframe></div></div></figure><p id="7c7c">In fact the app mentioned above, NewPipe, is not available on the Google Play store. So that means that the only platform able to benefit from YouTube downloading is iOS. There is no macOS version of the app but you can run the iOS app on an Apple Silicon Mac. Web users will be restricted to downloading audio or downloading 360p videos. Oh well. Maybe I’ll improve this feature in the future.</p><p id="cae5">And another problem. YouTube throttles some of the downloads. Not all of them though which is weird. I thought it was broken at first. Nope, it’s just that the downloads were really really slow.</p><p id="74fe">Although there’s a way around this too. Flutter has its own package for downloading YouTube videos called <code>youtube_explode_dart</code> and this one has gotten around the throttling issues. It’s listed as issue #180 and fixed in pull request 185.</p><figure id="c76e"><img src="https://cdn-images-1.readmedium.com/v2/resize:fit:800/1*R0QbSVVKcpNt1NDnlL-7Qg.png"><figcaption></figcaption></figure><p id="4a2c">And it works great now. Well, for the streams it supports. It doesn’t support all the streams. But it supports enough.</p><p id="7308">And, one more thing <code>youtube_explode_dart</code> doesn’t actually do everything <code>youtube-dl</code> does. <code>youtube-dl</code> actually gives you a lot more information on the actual files (such as if the audio is DRCed). So I’m still going to have to use it. But I can use <code>youtube_explode_dart</code> to actually download the files.</p><p id="8fe6">I do feel a little silly for wasting so much time on this feature. Like, I built an RSS reader to watch YouTube videos, not to download them. And the only people that can really take advantage of this feature are iOS users.</p><p id="9388">It’s funny. Everyone thinks iOS is the locked-down one. But in this one specific case Android is more locked down. Because if you look up YouTube downloaders on iOS there are pages and pages of them.</p><p id="0e6e">I could see myself taking advantage of this feature. Stratum 3.0.0 also introduces the ability to add external links. So I could find a YouTube video I like that I want to download and I could just download it.</p><p id="01c9">And this experience has taught me a lot about the inner workings of YouTube. Mostly the subtitles. I had no idea the method I was using to get subtitles before was so suboptimal. It works and there’s nothing wrong with it but it could be better.</p><p id="7e7d">I’m pretty happy with Stratum’s YouTube functionality now. I was happy with it before, to be honest, I just went down a ‘YouTube Rabbit Hole’. But I did have one more feature planned: automatic YouTube summary generation.</p><p id="5b0e">Because since adding YouTube summaries I’ve been watching a lot more YouTube. I mean summarizing a lot more YouTube. There are a lot of channels I’m interested in but can’t get to due to time restrictions. Like TED and DW News. Guess what? I follow both of those sources of news now and just read the summaries. But you know what I don’t like? Tapping on the button to generate the summaries.</p><p id="8a38">Well, those are some future plans. It will be expensive though, which is also why I’m planning to announce new pricing for Stratum soon.</p><p id="f6db">If you liked this post and would like to stay updated with my future articles consider using my RSS app Stratum on <a href="https://apple.co/3rZyh9B">iOS</a> and <a href="https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.amorfatite.keystone">Android</a>. Also check out my language learning app Litany (<a href="https://apple.co/45prCDA">iOS</a>, <a href="https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.amorfatite.litany">Android</a>).</p></article></body>

Photo by Alexandre Debiève on Unsplash

How Qualcomm Became My Best Trade Ever

QCOM stock exploded and the result was shocking…

On the 4th of March, I have added 30 shares of QCOM to my portfolio. The intention was to hold it for the long term, assuming its valuation at the time did not reflect at all the value of the company.

To start, QCOM was severely hit not only because of sector underperformance but also because of the long dispute with Apple.

Source: Finviz

On the weekly chart, we could see that QCOM was trading in a range and in February 2019 it hit the $50 level which was acting as support. Just in the graph above, we can spot 2 times it bounced before that.

I originally intended to add QCOM as a long-term hold and that is still my goal. I waited a few days to see which direction was going to take and if the support did hold as predicted.

So I bought the reversal at $53.33.

30 * $53.33 = $1599.90

As a long term hold, I was not inclined to trade it but on the 16th of April, Apple and Qualcomm decided to settle on their long dispute. This catalyst caused the stock to pop and QCOM gained more than $30 billion in market value.

For QCOM the settlement was a huge gain and most likely what will drive its leadership in the 5G chip business.

The next day, 17th of April, I have sold my position because I assumed it would pull back. Such a gain was too high to not lock-in profits.

30 * $79.35 = $2380.50

So my profit excluding fees was $780,60. Pretty good for a one-month and half investment!

A 48.79% gain is something that does not happen every day, especially in such big companies.

However, the stock did not pull back and continued the uptrend. If I had held it a few more days I could easily get more 10% out of it. But I have made the decision to not be greedy and I took my profits.

After breaking previous resistance levels so easily, I suspect it will retest those values in the coming weeks. I will be keeping an eye on it.

I have not quit on the idea of having it in my portfolio but it is hard to convince myself to buy something on its highs.

The end result is that QCOM is now officially my best trade ever and I guess it will be hard to beat!

If you like my content, please check my other stories:

Disclaimer: I am not a financial advisor. Always do your own research when investing in stocks.

Stock Market
Investing
Qualcomm
Trading
Technology
Recommended from ReadMedium