avatarAldric Chen

Free AI web copilot to create summaries, insights and extended knowledge, download it at here

5775

Abstract

e other hand, the <b>GPT-4 Turbo Vision</b> <b>preview </b>impresses with a vast context window of 128,000 tokens.</p><p id="dcf7"><i>Note: For a more in-depth understanding of tokens, take a moment to visit this <a href="https://help.openai.com/en/articles/4936856-what-are-tokens-and-how-to-count-them">link</a>.</i></p><h1 id="1c53">Tested Use-Cases using Gemini:</h1><h2 id="1f18">1] Image Interpretation</h2><p id="8a88">To test the image interpretation capabilities of Gemini I loaded a few images into Bard and posed questions that were based on Basic Object Recognition, Contextual Understanding, chart analysis, etc.</p><p id="257e">I tested basic object recognition by asking, “Can you identify the main subject in the picture?” and the model correctly identified the main subject.</p><figure id="5371"><img src="https://cdn-images-1.readmedium.com/v2/resize:fit:800/1*lnqXvKWNDxUu-Q1Mek0fYw.png"><figcaption>Screenshot from Bard’s console</figcaption></figure><p id="5278">Then I uploaded a bar graph depicting cost analysis for different AI models and asked the model to “Analyse the graph.”</p><p id="c087">While it correctly identified the models listed, it struggled to interpret the information and provided an incorrect explanation.</p><figure id="dbdd"><img src="https://cdn-images-1.readmedium.com/v2/resize:fit:800/1*n6ZGgZpXtvhnwn2kZyzBVg.png"><figcaption>Screenshot from Bard’s console</figcaption></figure><p id="b832">In contrast, GPT-4 provided a thorough explanation of the graph, pointing out and explaining every crucial detail. Therefore, GPT-4 excels in interpreting images.</p><figure id="52f9"><img src="https://cdn-images-1.readmedium.com/v2/resize:fit:800/1*Ge4LACOXW_Z51fAOQjMaZA.png"><figcaption>Response from GPT-4</figcaption></figure><h2 id="1bf1">2] Knowledge of Finance and Investment</h2><p id="168d">To assess Gemini’s understanding of finance and investment, I asked the following question: “What are the important questions to ask before putting money into financial products?”</p><p id="cf80">The model provided quite long and yet impressive responses.</p><figure id="277f"><img src="https://cdn-images-1.readmedium.com/v2/resize:fit:800/1*fu0bg5jEPcJACPZmgMRhJQ.png"><figcaption>Screenshot from Bard’s console</figcaption></figure><h2 id="0170">3] Access to Real-Time Data</h2><p id="31ec">Another super cool feature of Gemini is access to real-time information. It has been empowered to pull real-time data from other Google applications including Docs, Maps, Lens, Flights, Hotels, YouTube, and more. Also, its services are not limited to their knowledge to any date.</p><p id="763f">To test this feature, I asked:</p><p id="cd30">“Explain the training approaches used for the GPT-4 and Gemini models.”</p><figure id="d216"><img src="https://cdn-images-1.readmedium.com/v2/resize:fit:800/1*WrjzFaZvEtpbDPmfmMtXKQ.png"><figcaption>Screenshot from Bard’s console</figcaption></figure><p id="75fc">After thoroughly reviewing the responses, I found that the information provided was almost up to date; however, verifying the answers provided by AI models is crucial.</p><h2 id="1d76">4] Checking Math Ability</h2><p id="5840">Basic math, advanced math, algebraic, and temporal understanding questions were posed. Surprisingly, Gemini failed in basic math, advanced math, and temporal comprehension.</p><figure id="e4dd"><img src="https://cdn-images-1.readmedium.com/v2/resize:fit:800/1*01GO2XjW2fREqNKiDg7Now.png"><figcaption><i>The correct answer to the above question is 6.</i></figcaption></figure><p id="5dc5">When a bit more complicated problem was proposed as:</p><p id="dd2a"><b>Question</b>: “A debate club consists of 6 girls and 4 boys. A team of 4 members is said to be selected from this club including the selection of a captain (from among these 4 members) for the team. If the team has to be included at most one boy, then find the number of ways of selecting the team.”</p><p id="49a6">Sadly, Gemini could not solve the above problem.</p><figure id="c9f8"><img src="https://cdn-images-1.readmedium.com/v2/resize:fit:800/1*ueTEhoqMqKUdzaNhfbOLog.png"><figcaption>Screenshot from Bard’s console</figcaption></figure><p id="a41a">However, the GPT-4 model gave the right answer with explanations. Here is the response from the GPT-4 model.</p><figure id="2181"><img src="https://cdn-images-1.readmedium.com/v2/resize:fit:800/1*N7MeE4riVY7kcZhqDGdhjg.png"><figcaption>Response from Gpt-4</figcaption></figure><h2 id="3dff">5] Data analysis on the US Unemployment Dataset.</h2><p id="218d">Gemini was given a dataset from <a href="https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/aniruddhasshirahatti/us-unemployment-dataset-2010-2020">Kaggle.com</a>, which contained US unemployment rates, and was tasked with generating an article.</p><figure id="6a55"><img src="https://cdn-images-1.readmedium.com/v2/resize:fit:800/1*kd5-KU3JyaqOlHB1H6zfsg.png"><figcaption>Screenshot from Bard’s console</figcaption></figure><p id="f012">Gemini and GPT-4 both provided useful information and helpful insights by reading the dataset.</p><p id="4c92">Here is the response from GPT-4:</p><figure id="f107"><img src="https://cdn-images-1.readmedium.com/v2/resize:fit:800/1*30xCwXs45RxAWKw3IePGRA.png"><figcaption>Response from GPT-4</figcaption></figure><h2 id="aad3">6] Summarization and Reading Comprehension</h2><p id="1793">Next, Gemini was tested on its ability to comprehend a paragraph about globalization and answer questions related to it.</p><p id="8d76">Prompt given: Here is a paragraph: <paragraph> …. </paragraph>. Now answer the following questions. Question 1: What is globalization and what are the driving forces behind it? Question 2: What are some positive aspects of globalization? Question 3: What are some negative consequences of

Options

globalization?</p><figure id="6e5e"><img src="https://cdn-images-1.readmedium.com/v2/resize:fit:800/1*baBwS-UPDbvMprFdQCYrqA.png"><figcaption>Screenshot from Bard’s console</figcaption></figure><p id="834d">Gemini gave correct answers to all the questions along with relevant explanations.</p><p id="ca68">Even models like GPT-4 and Claude, with higher context lengths, exhibit similar proficiency in delivering accurate responses with detailed reasoning.</p><h2 id="4e16">7] Science Q&A</h2><p id="3f3f">Various questions on science topics, including metabolic processes and physics, were posed in both single-line and multiple-choice formats. Gemini successfully provided accurate answers to all the questions.</p><figure id="2d75"><img src="https://cdn-images-1.readmedium.com/v2/resize:fit:800/1*zaCqLideAEpPUDDU5cTJew.png"><figcaption></figcaption></figure><figure id="196e"><img src="https://cdn-images-1.readmedium.com/v2/resize:fit:800/1*_FdYfgWipz7r6-r28pR1MQ.png"><figcaption>Screenshot from Bard’s console</figcaption></figure><h2 id="de83">8] Coding Ability</h2><p id="a067">Gemini was asked to write a Python program designed to accept user inputs. The task required creating a program that could interact with users.</p><p id="8fb0">“Create a Python function named find_greater_than() that prompts the user for two inputs: a list of numbers and an integer threshold. The function should generate a new list containing all numbers from the input list that exceed the specified threshold. The order of numbers in the resulting list should mirror that of the input list.”</p><figure id="aca9"><img src="https://cdn-images-1.readmedium.com/v2/resize:fit:800/1*nTA9dIR8YhTdNxJjxQxlmQ.png"><figcaption>Screenshot from Bard’s console</figcaption></figure><p id="5fca">Despite explicitly instructing Gemini to consider input from the user, it failed to understand that.</p><p id="0d90">On the contrary, when the same question was asked to GPT-4, it provided an ideal coding solution. The response was well-structured, with each line thoroughly explained through comments. GPT-4 flawlessly executed the task by taking user input and delivering the required solution with precision.</p><figure id="35ae"><img src="https://cdn-images-1.readmedium.com/v2/resize:fit:800/1*Ib2i9qXq_h6FOXRWwYxAQw.png"><figcaption></figcaption></figure><h2 id="f102">9] Understanding the Medical Domain</h2><p id="b9be">While Gemini appears well-informed about medications and their potential side effects, relying solely on AI recommendations would be unwise.</p><p id="444d">It’s important to approach AI-generated information with caution and seek advice from trusted human sources in matters related to your health and medications.</p><figure id="f546"><img src="https://cdn-images-1.readmedium.com/v2/resize:fit:800/1*-yFJ0DM4Kng5YxaL0g-_6Q.png"><figcaption>Screenshot from Bard’s console</figcaption></figure><h2 id="384d">Important Note: Questioning Google’s Line!</h2><p id="0138">Google has been marketing <a href="https://deepmind.google/technologies/gemini/#capabilities">Gemini as the most advanced AI model</a> and has shown evaluation graphs like the one below.</p><figure id="12b2"><img src="https://cdn-images-1.readmedium.com/v2/resize:fit:800/1*jFlHd9yXHH563ytRtGXcbQ.png"><figcaption>Image from <a href="https://deepmind.google/technologies/gemini/#capabilities">Gemini — Google DeepMind</a></figcaption></figure><p id="5805">Google showed Gemini Ultra is better than human experts, but the way they did it is questionable. They drew a line to show superiority without allowing proper verification of their specific prompting technique.</p><h1 id="fd07">Pricing</h1><figure id="18ce"><img src="https://cdn-images-1.readmedium.com/v2/resize:fit:800/1*B5Yw7Y4SEbQfaki7jVsxRQ.png"><figcaption></figcaption></figure><p id="d38b">The above graph shows the pricing for different language models per 1000 tokens, based on the prompt (input) and completion (output). <a href="https://blog.google/technology/ai/gemini-api-developers-cloud/">Gemini Pro costs 0.001 for the prompt and 0.002 for the completion per 1000 tokens.</a></p><p id="39ce">Gemini Pro and GPT-3.5 Turbo-16k may be preferable for more cost-sensitive applications, while GPT-4 models offer more advanced capabilities at a higher cost.</p><p id="7834">Whereas Claude-100k, despite having a higher token limit, has a relatively lower cost compared to the GPT-4 models.</p><h1 id="0f50">Conclusion</h1><p id="7e7c">To conclude, the Gemini-Pro model has many advantages, but it also requires some enhancements. Tested use cases provide insights into Gemini’s performance. While it excels in certain areas, such as summarization, reading comprehension, scientific Q&A, and analyzing data, it faces challenges in basic math and advanced math.</p><p id="b4a6">Gemini’s real-time data access is a notable feature, pulling information from various Google applications.</p><p id="fb1b">Gemini’s limitations become apparent in scenarios like image interpretation, where it struggles compared to GPT-4. Additionally, its coding ability falls short when compared to GPT-4. The comparison with the GPT-4 model indicates that Gemini might not outperform in every aspect, and its strengths and weaknesses vary across different tasks.</p><p id="e063">In essence, Gemini showcases notable capabilities, users and developers must consider its performance in specific use cases and carefully evaluate its suitability for diverse applications, keeping in mind the strengths and limitations highlighted in the analysis.</p><h2 id="cbca">About the Author</h2><p id="7d92">Vaishnavi R is a Junior Data Scientist at the <a href="https://www.version1.com/it-service/innovation-labs/">Version 1 AI Labs.</a></p></article></body>

How I Leverage the Workplace to Develop an Entrepreneurial Spirit and Mind

Our workplace = Entrepreneur’s College

You can be happy in your workplace, too. Have something to work towards! Photo by Brooke Cagle on Unsplash

Not everyone will have a life-long career.

Sounds sad, right? But if that is the reality, then that is. We have jobs. They expire as we age.

Only lucky ones with a Midas Touch reach the top of the corporate pyramid.

It sounds negative, I know. But I choose to see the brighter side of things.

You see… the workplace represents a treasure trove hidden in plain sight. It is there for us to see, only if we see it for what it is.

For me, it is about my entrepreneurial spirit and mindset.

My workplace cultivates it.

The Workplace is a Breeding Ground for Future Entrepreneurs

There is no such thing as an Entrepreneur’s College.

Our workplace comes close.

Here’s why.

  • We learn how to manage expectations from all corners.
  • We observe how companies leverage technology.
  • We practice solving complex problems.
  • We develop work commitment.
  • We learn to work with others.

Our workplace is a snapshot of a business. We may change industries, sectors, and companies, but we cannot run away from sales, marketing, operations, finance, and projects.

Of course, there are human interactions with clients, bosses, business partners, team members, and venture capitalists.

The best place to learn about a business is to be in one. No brainer, right?

Think Big. Start Small. Because Small Is Doable

My first venture wasn’t a 500-employee big business.

It started small. It started with me.

I know a 1-person business works. That is why I am a proponent of it.

It is easier to start with yourself. You need not convince anyone why you are doing it. You know your entrepreneurial whys.

It is simpler, too.

If you have those entrepreneurial bubbles above your head, then,

  • Focus on understanding all domains in your workplace,
  • Observe how various forms of technology are utilized,
  • Scrutinize all expenses that cross your desk.

Your entrepreneurial mind starts expanding.

Bit by bit.

Soon, the blueprint for your 1-person business will crystalize in your head. You know what to focus on and what not to.

Now, you may be asking this question.

“Why create a 1-Person business? Why not 2? Or 5?”

Why I Endorse a 1-Person Business

Because this is, hands down, the easiest business to create.

Think about it this way. What do you hate most in your workplace?

Go ahead. Make your list.

This is mine.

You won’t (really) complain about the creaking chair, wobbly table, and pigeon-holed cubicle, do you?

I left companies because of bosses and colleagues. Companies asked me to leave because I offended diamond clients. It’s all about the people.

When we are alone, that people equation goes away. Instead, the spotlight is on skills.

We want to learn how to,

  • Networking, pitching, structuring, and closing deals from sales professionals,
  • Keep customers from customer success teams,
  • Solve complex issues like consultants.

Gaining experience in the workplace prompts relevant questions. It allows us to connect the dots.

  • How do we get our customers?
  • What happens after an order is placed?
  • How do we fulfill our contract obligation?
  • When do we collect the money? How much? And by who?
  • What happens when the customer is late paying the bills? Do I follow up?

Start with questions. Then, leverage your workplace to seek the answers.

Next, scale it down to a 1-person viable business.

Leverage Technology. It Gives You Wings

Let me share a story.

I have 2 direct counterparts in Client Account A. Jane is tech-savvy. Justin is not.

Justin struggles a lot with software and mobile apps. He would run around, asking colleagues and me about Salesforce.

  • “How do I create an opportunity?”
  • “How do I create my customer data here?”
  • “Salesforce is asking me for a verification code. Where do I find it?” (One-time password)

You can imagine the dread he goes through daily.

You can imagine the sense of dread his colleagues feel when Justin swings by their desks.

Jane, on the other hand, is self-sufficient.

  • She goes to Hubspot to check what their lead is interested in based on their clicks.
  • She goes to Salesforce customer status verification. New customer? Existing?
  • She goes to SAP Ariba to check and approve the vendor’s payments.
  • She analyzes the timesheet app to determine time spent on clients.
  • She sets up Calendly for email integration to manage her day.

She knows what to do and how to get things done.

I agree. It takes time to understand and leverage technology to our advantage.

But it is worth it.

Jane is living proof of a 1-person business.

Scrutinize Expenses that Crosses Your Desk

I recommend you do this.

The biggest challenge any future entrepreneur has is managing spend. In the workplace, we spend without thinking, so long as there is approval and a need for it.

You don’t need me to tell you that a business dinner with a prospect can rack up to hundreds. We do it because we know the money returns to us.

Now, change your perspective.

What if this business is yours?

You start asking questions.

  • “Do I need to spend so much on a dinner?”
  • “How can I reduce local commute?”
  • “Do I really need to pay for this?”
  • “What should I be paying for instead?”

Scrutinizing expenses requiring my approval or endorsement got me thinking hard. I started forming, deliberating, and answering questions in my head.

What can I do to minimize the necessary expenses?

Or.

How can I pass such expenses to the customer?

Or.

The monthly rental is expensive. Can I get a desk at the client’s office to reduce rental?

Or.

What is the cost of closing an office in the future if I want to set up one today?

Keep track of your questions. Make notes. Research the market.

You will drastically reduce the cost of setting up a business from Day 0. That sets you up for success.

Remember this.

  • The lower your bills, the lower your stress.
  • The lower your costs, the higher your profits.

Your 1-person business will survive years from now.

Parting Keynotes

Small is the new black. I stand by it.

In fact, go as small as you can. Go 1-person. Scale the revenue as high as you can as a 1-person business.

You will be happy.

This is because,

  • You manage yourself.
  • You keep the money.
  • You have control.

These are valuable lessons we can extract from our workplace after deliberate involvement and reflection.

I focus on them.

You should, too.

About the Author:

As a content contributor, I write my daily life observations and business exposure. Our life experience is the bedrock of our unique perspectives.

Do reach out and say hi on Linkedin and Twitter!

Entrepreneurship
Startup
Business
Venture Capital
Leadership
Recommended from ReadMedium