avatarShyamdeo Ranjan

Summary

The web content discusses the impact of Google, YouTube, and Medium's algorithms on user behavior, emphasizing that while these platforms offer valuable content, they can also lead to significant time wastage.

Abstract

The article reflects on the author's personal experience with Google, YouTube, and Medium, noting that while these platforms are designed to cater to user preferences through sophisticated algorithms, they often result in users spending 80% of their time on irrelevant content. The author points out that YouTube's recommendations can be both beneficial and detrimental, providing content that aligns with user likes but also leading to unproductive browsing. Google is acknowledged for its vast, free knowledge base, yet it also contributes to time waste. Medium, on the other hand, is presented as a potential solution, offering a paid membership model that filters out low-quality content and encourages meaningful engagement through its Partner Program. The author suggests that after 90 days of focused consumption on Medium, users can better discern the quality of content they engage with.

Opinions

  • The author believes that the algorithms of Google, YouTube, and Medium can lead to addiction and time waste, as they often provide content that is not necessarily aligned with the user's initial search for valuable information.
  • YouTube's algorithm, in particular, is criticized for creating a cycle of content consumption that is only 20% useful, with the remaining 80% being a waste of time.
  • Google is recognized as a vast source of free knowledge, but it is also seen as a platform that can lead to significant time waste due to its algorithm.
  • Medium is highlighted as a preferable alternative for those seeking more relevant and high-quality content, especially if they are willing to pay for the service and engage with the platform through comments and 'claps'.
  • The author suggests that active participation in liking, disliking, commenting, or clapping on these platforms can influence the algorithms to provide better content matches over time.
  • The conclusion of the article implies that users should be more discerning and proactive in their interactions with content on these platforms to improve their experience and the quality of the content they consume.

Google, Youtube and Medium

People are addicted and waste their time; its algorithm works beautifully on it.

I think there is no need to introduce these three platforms, either people finding helpful or not, and its algorithm work on both sides. My experience has been a mix-up. When I was naive in the internet world, I used to waste my time finding relevant content.

How to react, its algorithm to my like or dislike.

I don't know which video I should watch, but its algorithm works according to my likes or dislikes. Slowly, I realised that according to my preferences, its algorithm giving me the same kind of content, sometimes better than the earlier one, and some were useless.

It's a waste of your 80% of the time.

If you are trying to find some unique and solid content or information as per your curiosity, it's tough for you to find it on the first go. If you want to spend 1 hour on it, 80% time you will be wasting, and only 20% time you can find as per your need. For example, suppose you are discovering how to develop writing habits, you can find plenty of videos, and you do not know which one you should watch. If you spend 1 hour, the maximum of your time goes to waste. You do not find valuable content. Only 20% of the time you can find excellent or relevant content.

Google, Youtube are Mostly Free Sources to consuming knowledge and waste Your Time.

If you watch 10 minutes video and You do not find it relevant, it irritates you, It algorithm shows you the next following video with a curios title, you think this video is helpful, but it can't, but you are still persistent. Its algorithm gives good content. And same I told earlier your 80% time go waste, that's why these two are most free sources to waste our time. But after spending more than five years on Google and Youtube, it's better you can shift to Medium.

Medium:

If you can afford $5, you can switch to the Medium partner programme. Its creators and readers both are paid members, and it's an ad-free platform. There is no click bet article on it. Some creators also embedded the video link of some content you directly bring to the Youtube platform. Once you become a member from here for 90 days, you can only spend 1 hour every day consuming the content. After 90 days, you judge yourself which one is better. The last year, I primarily consuming the content and took action on it.

Conclusion:

If you are watching anyone video, you must like and dislike it, and its algorithms work on your likes and dislikes, the very following content gives you better than the earlier one. Google and Medium algorithm also work in your favour if you comment or clap someone article. Thank you for reading!

Google
YouTube
Medium
Social Media
Content
Recommended from ReadMedium