avatarDaniel Hopper

Summary

The website content discusses the natural limits of muscle building determined by genetics, emphasizing that while lifestyle and effort play a significant role, factors like height, bone structure, muscle shape, cellular composition, hormones, and body type ultimately dictate individual potential for muscle growth.

Abstract

The article "How Much Muscle Can We Build Naturally? Your Genetic Potential" delves into the concept of genetic potential in muscle building, highlighting the importance of resistance training and protein intake as the foundation for muscle growth. It underscores that despite optimal training and diet, there is a genetic ceiling to how much muscle mass one can naturally attain. This limit is influenced by various genetic factors, including height, bone structure, muscle belly length, tendon length, satellite cell activity, muscle fibre type, hormone levels like testosterone, and somatotype or body type. The article references studies and formulas by experts like Alan Aragon, Eric Helms, and Casey Butt to estimate the amount of muscle that can be gained naturally, suggesting that most men can expect to gain around 30–50 pounds of muscle over several years of dedicated training, with women gaining about half that amount. It also introduces the Fat-Free Mass Index (FFMI) as a tool to predict an individual's muscle-building potential based on height and bone structure. The article encourages readers to train hard and consistently while acknowledging that each person's genetic makeup will determine their unique muscle-building capacity.

Opinions

  • The author suggests that while genetics play a crucial role in muscle-building potential, many individuals do not reach their full genetic potential due to lack of dedication and effort in training and lifestyle choices.
  • It is implied that using steroids is the only way to surpass one's natural genetic muscle-building limit.
  • The article posits that lifestyle factors such as training program, diet, sleep, consistency, and effort are within an individual's control and can significantly impact muscle growth.
  • The author conveys that genetic factors, including height, bone structure, muscle shape, and hormonal

How Much Muscle Can We Build Naturally? Your Genetic Potential

You might want to look like Arnie or Thor, but your genetics dictate that you won’t. Not without steroids…

Image by Pete Linforth from Pixabay

Many of us desire the muscular physique of our favourite athlete or action movie stars.

Building muscle requires two key things. First, resistance training and progressive overload through exercises such as lifting weights in the gym. Second, people must consume enough protein to repair the muscle they just damaged.

That’s how to build muscle 101.

If you’ve ticked those boxes, how much muscle can you grow?

We’ve all seen huge guys in the gym who are obviously using steroids. You cannot compare yourself to that. But if you want to build as much muscle as possible without using performance-enhancing drugs, what can we expect to achieve?

This article explores our ‘genetic potential’ or ‘genetic limit’ for building muscle naturally.

What is your genetic potential?

Genetics determines the upper limit of an individual’s muscle-building potential.

Think of it as a scale. On one end, we have the genetically gifted, who probably had muscle mass as a teenager, before they even started training. At the other end of the scale is that skinny guy who has been going to the gym five days a week for 10 years and has seemed to have gained much, if any, noticeable muscle.

We can only build a certain amount of muscle naturally, no matter how optimum our training and diet are. To surpass this level of muscularity, an individual has to use steroids or other PEDs.

It is impossible to ascertain exactly what an individual’s potential is. But, we can estimate their approximate limit, which this article explores.

Photo by Sven Mieke on Unsplash

What we can control: lifestyle and effort

An individual’s genetics are obviously outside of their control. We’re born with them. However, many variables that influence how much muscle an individual can build are under their control.

Before getting into genetics, we’ll quickly explore the variables a person controls, which impact how much muscle they build and their ability to realise their true genetic potential.

Many people who frequent the gym are in no way near their true genetic limit for building muscle. Lifestyle and effort limit their results. They don’t progressively overload — you can read the article below to learn more about that.

Some individuals use genetics as an excuse for lack of results. Yes, it might be a little harder for some, but their dedication and effort are likely lacking.

Five factors that we control that impact our ability to build muscle are:

  • Training/exercise programming
  • Diet
  • Sleep
  • Consistency
  • Effort
Photo by LOGAN WEAVER on Unsplash

What we can’t control: Genetics

In a perfect world, we would all have optimum genetics for gaining the physique of a Greek god. Unfortunately, it’s not a perfect world.

“Some genetic traits are predetermined and are not subject to change, for example, your height or the colour of your eyes.” — Hansen, 2005

If we have bad genetics for building muscle, we’re not going to be able to build the same physique as someone with better genetics.

Several studies show individuals experience huge variations in how much muscle they gain on training programs — e.g. this study and this study.

Genetics account for a lot of this variance. Factors that determine the limits of a person’s ability to increase their muscularity include:

  • Height and bone structure
  • Muscle shape
  • Muscle cells and fibres
  • Hormones like Testosterone
  • Body type

These will each be discussed in more depth over the following paragraphs.

Height and bone structure

Research indicates that an individual’s potential for muscle growth is positively correlated with height and bone structure.

Taller men with larger bone structures usually have a higher potential to build muscle than shorter men with slender bone structures.

We can find an estimation for someone’s muscle-building potential by measuring the circumference of their wrist/ankle (We’ll discuss this shortly).

“…A great physique begins with the bones on which it is constructed. Bone structure can either make or break a good physique.” — Casey Butt, 2018

Francis Holway created a ratio for how much muscle can be grown according to how much bone you have. He measured thousands of athletes, from football (soccer) to weight lifters, to rugby players.

He found most men can gain around 5 kilograms of muscle for every kilogram of bone in their bodies. Women slightly less, at 4.1.

“Holway has found that each kilogram (2.2 pounds) of bone supports a maximum of five kilograms (11 pounds) of muscle.” — David Epstein, 2014

Dr Casey Butt found a link between peoples’ wrist and ankle sizes and their ability to build muscle. Wider ankles and wrist tends to be linked to being more muscular and having a better ability to build muscle.

Bodybuilders from 1968 (probably all-natural) Image source

Muscle shape

Where a muscle is attached determines a muscle’s shape. A muscle has two main parts:

  1. The belly
  2. The tendon

The belly is the main mass of tissue that contracts and expands when a person flexes or works out that muscle. The tendon connects muscle bellies to the skeleton.

Image source

The tendon and belly both vary in length between individuals.

Muscles can only grow wider and can’t grow longer. Therefore, the longer the muscle bellies and the shorter the tendons, the more potential a muscle can grow physically larger.

See below for a comparison between a short belly and long tendons, and a long belly and short tendons.

Muscle cells and fibres

There is growing evidence that satellite cell activity influences variations in response to the training stimulus.

‘High responders’ to resistance training tend to have higher levels of satellite cells than ‘low responders’.

The size of muscle cells found in each muscle can also determine its growth potential. Bodybuilders were found to have bodybuilders have larger fibres rather than more fibres compared to the general population.

A process called hyperplasia increases the number of cells in the muscle as a direct response to exercise, enhancing a person’s ability to grow more muscle fibre.

Genetics determines the type of muscle fibre that is predominant in the muscle cell. There are two types of muscle fibres: white and red. White cells are also known as fast-twitch fibres and red slow twitch. Red cells are more suited to endurance and white to anaerobic activities such as sprinting, javelin throwing or weight lifting.

Another genetic factor influencing satellite cell activity and muscle growth is myostatin, which our body produces.

Lower levels of myostatin are shown to correspond with high levels of muscle hypertrophy — the ability to build muscle.

Image source

Testosterone

Testosterone is the main anabolic hormone produced by our body, influencing our ability to grow and maintain muscle. Steroids enhance an individual's ability to build muscle by boosting testosterone levels well above what occurs naturally.

Each individual’s ability to produce testosterone naturally will vary, and it declines over a person’s lifetime after peaking in their mid to late 20s.

Studies also indicate that people with high testosterone levels have higher levels of satellite cell activity, enhancing their muscle-building potential.

“There’s many, many other genes at play when it comes to human performance, but it definitely seems that testosterone and myostatin play a large role in muscle hypertrophy and might even mediate the activity of other genes involved with muscle growth” — Ottinger, 2018

Body type

In the 1940s, Dr William Sheldon developed the theory of somatotypes, classifying physiques into three broad categories: Endomorph, Mesomorph, and Ectomorph.

  • An Endomorph is naturally heavy or overweight. They have round features, thick bone structure, and struggle to keep fat off.
  • A Mesomorph is athletic, with wide shoulders and a large chest. They’re lean, strong and muscular.
  • An Ectomorph is skinny, with long limbs, a flat chest and narrow shoulders. They hold little body fat and struggle to gain fat and muscle.

“All champion bodybuilders have mesomorph characteristics… Someone who is largely ectomorphic or endomorphic does not have the genetic makeup to become a champion bodybuilder” — Hansen, 2005

Having a Mesomorph body type is obviously a huge advantage for anyone who wants to gain muscle.

Image source

Calculating your genetic muscle-building potential

I have just outlined some of the variables which account for how much muscle a person can build.

But how do we know how close we are to our own potential?

There have been several scientists researching how much muscle a person can build naturally. The first popular methods come from Alan Aragon and Eric Helms, who estimate that an advanced lifter — anybody who has been training for longer than four years, can add 0.25–0.5% of body weight in muscle a year.

The second method is from Lyle McDonald, who believes men can gain up to 40 to 50 pounds of muscle in their first 4 to 5 years of proper diet and training, and most women can naturally gain 20 to 25 pounds.

After this point, muscle gain is relatively negligible — A kg or a couple of pounds a year, and our ability to grow more muscle slowly diminishes as we age.

These models assume proper training, defined as exerting enough effort and following a program to progressively overload, using heavy compound lifts, eating enough protein to repair and grow muscle and getting enough sleep for the body to recover.

Anybody half-assing it won’t see these results.

Aragon’s and McDonald’s estimates for building muscle | Image Source: Legion athletics

A third model, from Casey Butt, introduced the theory of fat-free mass index (FFMI); a measurement of how much muscle we can build per unit of height. Butt believes most men can expect to gain around 30–35lbs of muscle.

He created a formula to estimate an individual’s potential for building muscle, based on their bone structure and height.

The formula is: H1.5 (√W ÷ 22.667 + √A ÷ 17.0104)(%bf ÷ 224 + 1). It probably means very little; see below for an explanation.

Casey Butt’s formula for an individual’s potential to build muscle

Butt based his formula on the analysis of over 300 class and overall title-winning drug-free bodybuilders and strength athletes from 1947 to 2010. Due to being elite, they’re believed to have reached their natural muscle building potential.

He found the best indicator of bone mass and thus muscle-building potential was the thickness of the wrists and ankles.

There are several calculators online based on Butt’s formula or something similar to predict a person’s FFMI.

Final Thoughts

This article has explored the many factors that impact how much muscle a person can gain naturally without the assistance of performance-enhancing drugs.

We’ve covered the variances in individuals and formulas to give a generalised prediction of how much muscle a person can build.

If you’re interested in knowing how much muscle you can put on, hopefully, this article has given you some insight into what is possible for you.

Remember, it is impossible to know precisely what your genetic potential is for building muscle. But most people are nowhere near theirs, so remember that next time you’re in the gym, train a little bit harder than last time.

Thank you for reading.

If you liked the content, you might be interested in this article about the body transformations of Hollywood actors who were probably using steroids.

Read More Medium Articles

Non-Medium members can only read 3 articles a month.

Become a Medium Member for unlimited access to my content and articles from thousands of other writers, for just $5 a month.

Subscribe to be notified when I publish new content.

Fitness
Health
Exercise
Workout
Bodybuilding
Recommended from ReadMedium