avatarJohn DeVore

Summary

The website content discusses the thematic elements and reception of George R.R. Martin's "Game of Thrones" series and its prequel "House of Dragons," highlighting the consistent focus on food amidst the narrative's murder and political intrigue.

Abstract

The "Game of Thrones" series, both in its original books and television adaptation, is characterized by its unique blend of gritty realism and fantasy elements, often subverting traditional tropes with a darker, more cynical portrayal of medieval life. Despite the later books and TV series receiving criticism for their unfocused narratives and over-reliance on shock value, the meticulous descriptions of Westerosi cuisine remain a consistent and beloved aspect of the series. This attention to culinary detail has even inspired multiple cookbooks. The new prequel series, "House of Dragons," continues the tradition of political machinations and explicit content while delivering the expected grandeur of ominous feasts, solidifying its place within the "Game of Thrones" universe.

Opinions

  • The author views the early "Game of Thrones" books as excellent, with a smart and pulpy narrative that becomes less disciplined in the later volumes.
  • George R.R. Martin is acknowledged for his bravery in subverting classic fantasy archetypes, though the series is seen as becoming increasingly unfocused after the first three books.
  • The author expresses understanding towards Martin for not completing the book series, considering the immense success of the HBO adaptation.
  • The dramatic impact of the series is attributed to pivotal moments like Ned Stark's execution and the Red Wedding, with everything following being less significant.
  • Food is highlighted as a consistent and beloved element of the series, with the author particularly enjoying the detailed descriptions of feasts and everyday meals.
  • The "House of Dragons" prequel is seen as a success in appealing to both diehard and casual fans, despite lacking some of the original series' charismatic characters.
  • The author appreciates the inclusion of traditional "Game of Thrones" elements in "House of Dragons," such as political intrigue and lavish feasts, indicating a preference for these aspects over character-driven storylines.
Photo: HBO

‘Game of Thrones’ Has Two Vibes: Murder Orgy And Ominous Feast

And the new prequel serves up both, albeit unequally

George RR Martin’s Game of Thrones books are gripping but inconsistent, especially the last few freewheeling volumes. The books subvert romantic medieval fantasy stories, and Martin has grisly fun turning knights into bloodthirsty mercenaries and princesses into chattel. He bravely asks, “What if hobbits were sex-crazed lunatics?”

The first three books were excellent, at least. Pulpy, but smart. The series starts out as a twisty, cynical baroque opera that kills beloved characters in shocking ways, but as the saga progresses, the books become less disciplined, and the multiple narratives meander.

Martin’s final two books were wildly unfocused, including the last book he wrote, 2011’s ‘A Dance With Dragons’, which came out at the same time the HBO television adaptation premiered. One became a bestseller but the other an international mega-hit.

Martin has never finished writing his own series, and while he has, for years, promised to wrap up the epic he started, he allowed HBO to conclude his gory, soft-core fairy tale about dragons, zombies, and zero-sum politics instead.

I don’t blame the man. I mean, who wouldn’t pocket the cash and relax?

The truth is, Ned Stark’s surprise demise in Martin’s first tome and the Red Wedding in ‘A Storm of Swords’ are Game Of Throne’s dramatic pinnacles, and everything after that is either sex, violence, or whisperings in stairwells. This is also true for the TV show.

But the one thing he was consistent about over the course of his novels is the food. Martin loves writing about soup, that’s for sure. I’d say a third of the details in Game of Thrones are about what the kings and peasants of Westeros eat.

There are multiple cookbooks about this very same topic.

When you play the game of thrones, you’re always dramatically guzzling mead from tankards and gnawing on bones. The people of Westeros adore roast boar, lemon cakes, and thick, meaty stews served on trenchers of bread. Lamprey pies are a favorite delicacy in the seven kingdoms. What’s a lamprey? Here you go.

My favorite parts of these books are when our heroes have a moment to nosh pudding, mutton, or jellied calf brain. These moments have nothing to do with the plot, and Game of Thrones is nothing but who is stabbing whom in the back. But Martin always returns to quails drowned in butter or crabs boiled in spices. The man loves uncomfortable sex scenes and the quaffing of ale. Game of Thrones has two vibes: murder orgy and ominous feast.

This brings me to the new Game of Thrones prequel, House of Dragons, which is a couple of episodes old now (there will be 10 in total) and already a rousing success, which should surprise anyone. The original’s series finale was controversial, which is pretty standard for cultural phenomenons. The more popular a show, the greater the chance that its conclusion will be mocked on social media. You just can’t please people nowadays.

House of Dragons was cooked by executives to appeal to diehard and casual fans of Martin’s nasty little fantasy without the baggage of the original. Set 172 years before the birth of Daenerys Targaryen, House of Dragons lacks the fussy charisma of Peter Dinklage’s Tyrion and noble Brienne of Tarth, played by Gwendoline Christie. Winter isn’t quite coming yet. House of Dragons is pure uncut faux-medieval politics, The West Wing meets Conan The Barbarian. And, like Game of Thrones, House of Dragons has plenty of gross, pervy moments.

The first episode features a gut-wrenching birth scene, and, later, Matt Smith’s evil prince gives a speech during a sex party that stops the revelers mid-thrust. So far, so good.

I wasn’t sold, however, until the second episode when we get our first dinner scene between two important characters, namely Paddy Considine’s dopey King Viserys and his daughter and heir to the Iron Throne, silver-haired Rhaenyra, played by Milly Alcock. Sure, in the pilot episode, there’s lots of wine pouring and wine drinking, but I had to wait a week or a scene where characters stabbed food with forks, chewed thoughtfully, and slowly gulped from goblets.

That’s all I want. Portentous meals between ambitious two faces. A few weird sex scenes. A dragon roaring, a couple of double-crosses. Nothing fancy, and that’s House of Dragons. It’s real meat and potatoes stuff.

TV Series
Fantasy
Game of Thrones
Pop Culture
Streaming
Recommended from ReadMedium