From Stitches to Solutions : My Take on America’s Frankenstein Healthcare
We all have our opinions on healthcare, and this is just one of many. I could be wrong, but in my opinion, the current health system in America needs a massive overhaul. This isn’t a problem that emerged overnight but rather the result of generations of patchwork deregulations and incentives for for-profit healthcare. The prevailing model seems less about healing and more about profit-making. A combination of limited oversight and inefficiencies has transformed our healthcare system into an extreme version of its original intent. We’re now faced with a dichotomy: sick care for some and luxury care for the affluent. The vast majority of the working population is tied to the healthcare plans their employers offer, with little to no choice in the matter. It’s a take-it-or-leave-it situation. And then there are those who fall through the cracks, either because they can’t afford healthcare or their employers don’t offer it. I could go on and on about this, but deep down, we all know change is needed. To truly understand a problem, we must see how we got here. I want to start with America’s beginnings and trace our journey to today. From there, we’ll try to find solutions based on what’s working across the world already. We already know what doesn’t work.
Note to Readers: We writers don’t get paid unless Medium subscribers engage with the article — be it through 👏 claps, reading for at least 30 seconds, or leaving a comment. Your support helps us continue to create valuable content. Thank you so much! 👍
Historical Evolution
In the early days of America, healthcare was a simple, community-driven affair. Doctors often traded their services for goods, and the few hospitals that existed were primarily charitable institutions. As our nation grew and medical treatments became more complex, the need for a structured system became evident. The late 19th and early 20th centuries marked the rise of hospitals and the birth of health insurance, initially designed to cover accidents and work-related injuries.
A pivotal moment in our healthcare story occurred during World War II. With wage controls in place, companies couldn’t lure workers with higher salaries. Instead, they began offering health insurance as a benefit, unintentionally anchoring our nation to the employer-based insurance system we grapple with today. Fast forward to 1965, and we see the government stepping in with the introduction of Medicare and Medicaid, aiming to ensure the elderly and the impoverished had access to care.
Yet, as the decades rolled on, the landscape shifted. The latter half of the 20th century saw a growing emphasis on profit in healthcare. Deregulations opened the doors for private, for-profit entities to dominate the scene, leading to a system where the bottom line often overshadowed patient well-being. The dawn of the 21st century brought with it the Affordable Care Act (ACA). While the ACA expanded healthcare access for millions, a commendable feat, it also inadvertently bolstered the insurance industry’s profits. By increasing the customer base through the exchanges, insurance companies benefited significantly. However, the ACA, despite its merits, didn’t fully address the root causes of the healthcare system’s inefficiencies and rising costs.
Behind every policy, every shift, are real people seeking care, healing, and well-being. As we trace our journey from community doctors to the messy patch-work of today’s healthcare, we’re reminded of the very essence of healthcare: The human touch.
The Human Impact: Access and Affordability
The idea of having to worry about going to the doctor doesn’t have to persist in America the way it does. Avoiding doctor visits or not taking proactive measures can be a thing of the past. Thousands of Americans die every year due to the lack of healthcare, which is tragic for such a wealthy country. Then there’s the economic burden it places on us. We spend money to have access to a system we can’t even afford to use. If we dare to use it, it may mean more hidden bills due to a lack of transparency. Or even worse, the insurance companies decide that they aren’t going to cover you.
This leads to another grave problem: bankruptcy. The number one reason people go bankrupt in America is because of medical bills. According to a study by the Kaiser Family Foundation in 2019, 79% of those who filed for bankruptcy due to medical bills had insurance. They did what they were supposed to do, and still, it wasn’t good enough. Meanwhile, all these layers of complication add more administrative costs. The whole system has become inefficient from start to finish.
Imagine a young mother, juggling work and family, suddenly faced with a medical emergency. She’s insured, but the bills start piling up, each one more confusing than the last. She’s forced to make choices no one should have to — between health and financial stability. Her story is not unique, it’s a reflection of a system that’s lost its way, prioritizing profit over patients. But who’s getting these profits at our expense?
Where’s the money going?
The profits from our healthcare woes don’t just vanish into thin air, they line the pockets of several key players in the system.
Insurance Companies stand as the gatekeepers of healthcare for many Americans. They decide what treatments are covered, which doctors you can see, and how much you’ll pay out of pocket. While they play a crucial role in managing risk and pooling resources, their primary goal often leans towards maximizing shareholder profits. This objective can manifest in various ways, such as denying expensive treatments, hiking up premiums, or finding loopholes to drop high-cost patients.
Then we have the Pharmaceutical Companies. The U.S. consistently outspends other nations on drugs. This disparity isn’t just because Americans consume more medicine, but largely because drug companies here set their own prices, with little to no checks in place. While it’s undeniable that research and development are costly endeavors, many argue that the prices charged, especially for life-saving drugs, border on the exorbitant.
Hospitals and Health Systems form another piece of this intricate puzzle. Many hospitals in the U.S. operate as for-profit entities. Their primary objective? Revenue. This goal can sometimes translate to a push to fill beds, order a battery of tests, and provide a slew of services, irrespective of whether they’re all medically necessary. It’s a poignant irony that while countless healthcare professionals enter the field driven by a genuine desire to help, the institutions they serve might prioritize revenue streams over patient well-being.
Medical Device Manufacturers also play their part. Be it hip replacements, heart monitors, or any medical device, these companies often charge significantly more in the U.S. than they do in other countries.
Then there’s the Middlemen, known as Pharmacy Benefit Managers, operate in the shadows, negotiating drug prices between insurers and drug manufacturers. They pocket a cut of the savings they negotiate. However, the lack of transparency in their operations raises eyebrows and questions about whose interests they truly serve. I think we all know the answer.
Each of these entities, in their own way, contributes to driving up the cost of healthcare in America. They operate within a framework that often allows them to prioritize profits over patients, frequently with minimal oversight or accountability. The culmination of their actions and the system’s inherent flaws has given birth to our current healthcare scenario — a Frankenstein’s monster. Stitched together from disparate parts, each seemingly more concerned with its own survival than with the well-being of the patients it’s supposed to serve.
A World of Difference: Healthcare Beyond American Shores
In 2021, the U.S. spent a staggering 17.8% of its gross domestic product (GDP) on healthcare, a figure that is notably higher than many other developed nations. Despite this significant expenditure, the quality and accessibility of healthcare in the U.S. often lag behind its peers. Let’s look at a comparison of some other nations to gain perspective:
Canada: Our northern neighbor dedicates approximately 10.7% of its GDP to healthcare. With a publicly funded system, Canadians have universal access to hospital and physician services without direct charges at the point of care. Source: Wikipedia
United Kingdom: The UK, with its National Health Service (NHS), spends about 9.8% of its GDP on healthcare. The NHS is a publicly funded system that provides healthcare “free at the point of delivery”, ensuring that medical treatment is a right for its residents. Source: Wikipedia
Germany: Allocating roughly 11.7% of its GDP to healthcare, Germany offers a multi-payer system where citizens are mandated to have health insurance. The system is funded through a combination of payroll taxes and premiums. Source: Wikipedia
Sweden: Sweden spends about 11% of its GDP on healthcare. With a tax-funded system, Swedes have access to healthcare services with minimal out-of-pocket costs. The focus is on ensuring equal access to services, irrespective of the individual’s financial situation. Source: Wikipedia
It’s evident that while countries like Canada, the UK, Germany, and Sweden spend a lower percentage of their GDP on healthcare compared to the U.S., they often provide more comprehensive and accessible services to their citizens. This disparity underscores the need for the U.S. to reevaluate its healthcare priorities and seek inspiration from global best practices. These systems range from a more centralized approach like single-payer healthcare to a multilayered one like Universal healthcare. One thing is for sure, change is needed.
The Economic Argument: Benefits for Businesses and Workers
For the conservative audience who values economic freedom and efficiency, there’s a compelling argument to be made about the benefits of decoupling health insurance from employment. Firstly, businesses, especially small ones, often bear the brunt of rising healthcare costs. By removing the onus of providing health insurance from employers, we can free them from the administrative burden and financial strain, allowing them to invest more in growth, innovation, and job creation.
For workers, the benefits are twofold. Not only would they have the freedom to choose a healthcare plan that best suits their needs, but they would also no longer feel tethered to a job solely for the insurance benefits. This can foster a more dynamic labor market, where individuals can pursue opportunities based on passion, skill, and growth potential rather than being bound by healthcare constraints. It’s a win-win: businesses can operate more efficiently, and workers gain both health and job mobility.
Reimagining American Healthcare
The challenges facing the U.S. healthcare system are undeniably complex, but they are not insurmountable. As we’ve seen, other nations have successfully implemented systems that prioritize patient well-being over profit. So, what can America learn from these models, and how can we adapt them to our unique context?
Universal Healthcare vs. Single-Payer: What’s the Difference?
Universal healthcare and single-payer systems are terms often used interchangeably, but they represent distinct approaches to healthcare delivery. At its core, universal healthcare ensures that every citizen, regardless of their financial situation, has access to the medical services they need. This doesn’t necessarily mean the government is the sole provider. It could be a multi-payer system where the government ensures that everyone is covered, but multiple entities, including private companies, can provide insurance.
On the other hand, a single-payer system is a subset of universal healthcare where the government acts as the primary payer for all healthcare services. It centralizes healthcare financing, but not necessarily the delivery of care. In such a system, private providers can still exist, but they receive reimbursement from a single, government-run entity.
Given America’s diverse and decentralized nature, a universal healthcare system might be more fitting. It offers flexibility, allowing for a mix of public and private entities, and can be tailored to meet the unique needs of different states or regions. This approach can provide the benefits of broad coverage without the challenges of centralizing the entire system.
The Benefits of Universal Healthcare
Universal healthcare, as seen in many developed nations, offers several advantages:
Equitable Access: Every citizen has access to essential health services, ensuring that healthcare is a right and not a privilege.
Cost Efficiency: By pooling resources and negotiating prices at a national or state level, costs can be better controlled.
Focus on Preventative Care: Emphasizing early intervention and regular check-ups can lead to better health outcomes and reduced long-term costs.
Reduced Administrative Overhead: With a more streamlined approach to insurance and billing, administrative costs can be significantly reduced.
Universal Health Records
An idea I think would benefit all Americans is a Universal Health Record (UHR). It would be used from the first time one goes to the doctor to any interaction with the healthcare system. This would not only help the patient understand the trajectory of their health to take proactive measures but also society as a whole. Given the sensitivity of this info, the private sector should remain hands-off unless a third party is asked to aggregate the info for the govt. Our data isn’t for sale! It’s there to help understand the health of individuals and how the combined data of those individuals paint a picture of society as a whole.
Currently in America, there is something called Longitudinal patient data. This data is collected over time from the same individual and can include data from electronic health records (EHRs), claims data, and patient surveys. Its spirit is in the right direction in tracking individual medical records but still lacks a cohesive approach. Not only that, money seems to be the main motivator. Data is the new gold, and it should be protected, not exploited. A UHR would have guardrails in place to protect the individual from this. Overall, I think a UHR would benefit individuals, but society over the decades can use this info to better the communities’ health outcomes.
The benefits of universal healthcare are evident, adapting it to the American context requires careful consideration. The U.S. has a long history of private healthcare provision, and any transition would need to account for this. A phased approach, starting with expanded public options or state-level experiments, could pave the way for broader reforms.
While the journey to reforming American healthcare is challenging, it’s essential. By understanding the nuances of different systems and being willing to innovate and adapt, America can build a healthcare system that truly serves ALL its citizens.
The American healthcare system, as it stands, resembles a Frankenstein’s monster — pieced together from various components, each with its own interests, often lacking the cohesive purpose of serving the patient. From its historical roots to the glaring disparities in access and affordability, the emphasis has frequently been on profit rather than patient well-being. As we’ve observed, other nations have successfully implemented healthcare models that prioritize their citizens without the staggering costs we see in the U.S.
America requires a healthcare system that marries efficiency with equity. Whether through universal healthcare, single-payer, or another model altogether, the objective remains the same, quality care for every American without the threat of financial devastation.
In the end, we as a nation must make a choice. If we truly want our nation to heal, we must come together and address the flaws in our healthcare system. Like an addict, it’s time for America to wean itself off its current dependencies to our current system. The transition may be painful, but in the long run, all of America stands to benefit. It’s more than just policy or numbers, it’s about ensuring every individual, regardless of their background, has the opportunity for a healthy life. As we look to the future, it’s imperative to rebuild our healthcare system, not as a disjointed entity, but as a unified force that genuinely serves ALL Americans.
Thank you for reading all the way to the end! Your engagement is what makes this journey worthwhile for me, and I truly value your thoughts and opinions.
👉 Let’s Keep the Conversation Going:
- What was your biggest takeaway from this article?
- Is there a point you agree or disagree with? I’d love to hear your perspective.
- Do you have a personal experience that relates to the topic? Your stories make these discussions richer.
- Are there any questions or topics you’d like me to cover in future posts?
🙏 Your Voice Matters: By taking a moment to comment, you’re helping to elevate this conversation and make these discussions more dynamic and accessible to a broader audience.
So, let’s keep the dialogue alive and flowing! Your interaction is not just welcomed — it’s encouraged!
Thank you for being an integral part of this community. I’m eager to hear your thoughts!
