avatarDee Adams

Summary

The article discusses the importance of thorough fact-checking and due diligence, exemplified by activist Lateefah Simon's incorrect removal from her BART board position due to reliance on inaccurate information.

Abstract

The article, titled "Fired Under Strange Circumstances?" on the undefined website, delves into the incident where Lateefah Simon, an activist and elected director on the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) board, was removed from her position after moving based on incorrect information provided by BART officials. The article emphasizes the significance of the CRAAP test—an acronym for currency, relevancy, authority, accuracy, and purpose—in verifying information to prevent costly mistakes. It highlights the need for written confirmations, questioning the source of information, understanding applicable laws, maintaining records of consultations, and verifying with external authoritative sources. The incident at BART, which is not isolated to government settings, serves as a cautionary tale about the risks of acting on misinformation from seemingly authoritative sources.

Opinions

  • The article suggests that BART officials failed to provide accurate information to Simon, leading to her removal from the board.
  • It implies that BART knew the correct information after Simon had already moved, indicating a potential lack of support or communication from the agency.
  • The author emphasizes that no one is immune to errors in judgment, as evidenced by the CRAAP test not always being passed.
  • There is an underlying critique of the broader implications of misinformation, whether due to honest mistakes, incompetence, implicit bias, or racism.
  • The author, Dee Adams, advocates for proactive measures in fact-checking, especially for women and people of color, to avoid negative consequences based on incompetence, bias, racism, or misinformation.

Fired Under Strange Circumstances?

Five ways you can prevent that from happening

Waldemar Brandt on Unsplash

Overlooking the term CRAAP may result in costly mistakes in business, education, medical, and medical-legal situations for starters.

The term is an acronym coined by the California State University Library in Chico by Sarah Blakeslee. And it means currency, relevancy, authority, accuracy, and purpose.

Consider: Activist Lateefah Simon began receiving multiple threats for her pro-police reform activism as one of seven elected directors on the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) board. Concerned for the safety of her daughter, she sold her home and moved.

According to the East Bay Times, as a result of Simon’s move within what she believed was still her district, Simon was stripped from her paid position (less than $20k annually) as a board director with Northern California’s Transit Agency.

Many would argue there is a lot to unpack in this incident.

Simon consulted BART staff and officials for clearance before she moved and received an OK, but the information Simon was given was incorrect.

After Simon moved, BART knew the correct answer. End of discussion.

This article will focus only on what many people overlook about fact-checking and due diligence and why it often may not work.

Simon believed she had been given the right information, although officials state she never asked and they had no evidence of such. Check out the BART district map below.

This incident occurred in a state government setting, but the underlying issue is not unique. It underscores how inaccurate information handed out by seemingly authoritative sources and then relied upon can be costly in many other situations.

The takeaway here is that no one always passes the CRAAP test 100 percent.

1. Always ask in writing and get an answer in writing. 2. Never assume the wanted answer confirmed is correct. Ask which source is the given answer based on. 3. Find out the applicable law or regulation. 4. Ensure the parties consulted have a written record of your concern. 5. Double-check with an authoritative source outside the system.

Regardless of race or gender, whether an honest mistake, incompetence, implicit bias, or racism, being given the wrong information is too often the case.

So for your well-being, do not overlook any element of the five steps listed above.

Thank you for reading.

Dee Adams is the author of the forthcoming title Inspector Squirrel’s Multicultural Medical Notebook: Overlooked tips for women and people of color with unexpected injury or illness

A book that underscores the importance of asking the right questions and fact-checking the answers so that you can avoid mistakes based on incompetence, bias, racism, or misinformation.

Sources

Eliyahu Kamisher | [email protected] | Bay Area News Group March 10, 2022 at 5:17 p.m. | UPDATED: March 11, 2022

Former board member makes plea against her removal

Activism
Workplace
Women In Politics
Violence Against Women
Violence Against Children
Recommended from ReadMedium
avatarDr. Samantha Rodman Whiten (Dr. Psych Mom)
My Wife Is Fat

Reader Wife Is Fat writes:

8 min read