Social Media Platforms Are Responsible For Ensuring The Non Exploitation Of Child Content Creators. Here’s Why.
Child content creators are beloved. The trend goes back to film and television where child actors and performers through out the eras many of whom audiences grew up with became resonations of their childhoods and life’s milestones.
Jackie Coogan, Shirley Temple, Elizabeth Taylor, Michael Jackson, Sammy Davis Jr, Emmanuel Lewis and of course Macaulay Culkin of Home Alone are examples.
Most of these child stars have worked in an industry with stringent laws, rules and regulations that not only protects them from being exploited but also caters for their growth, schooling and development. Even though these laws could also apply to child content creators on social media by extension, implementing them is harder as a lot of content creation takes place at home with parents or guardians and not in major productions.
Because minors cannot create social media pages or manage the monetization of their platforms, their parents take up these responsibilities.
They earn a considerable amount of money in the process and it is not clear whether this income goes directly to the child who is the star of the show or how much of it does.
Social media platforms are businesses. And the main purpose of any business is to maximize profits.
Because they share in the revenues generated from the channels of child content creators, social media platforms should also share in the responsibility.
They need to ensure the safeguarding of the mental and emotional health of these children and most importantly ensure that after a childhood spent generating income for them, these children have something to show for it financially among other things upon reaching adulthood.
How protected are child content creators in our times? Learn more.
Here’s what social media platforms can do that to ensure the protection of child content creators.






