avatarRyszard Skarbek

Summary

The web content discusses the fine-tuning of the Universe's physical constants and conditions post-Big Bang that have allowed for the existence of life, touching on concepts like matter-antimatter asymmetry, the rate of cosmic expansion, nuclear forces, and the anthropic principle versus the multiverse theory.

Abstract

The article "Deus ex Machina — Part 2" explores the remarkable circumstances that led to the formation of our Universe and the emergence of life within it. It describes the minute imbalance between matter and antimatter in the early Universe, where an excess of quarks led to the matter that constitutes the cosmos today. The text highlights the delicate balance of the Universe's expansion rate and nuclear forces, which had to be precisely tuned to allow for the formation of stars, planets, and life. It notes that over 30 physical constants, including the speed of light and gravity, are finely tuned without any mathematical derivation, suggesting a correlation that permits conscious life. The article presents two interpretations of these phenomena: the anthropic principle, which posits that the Universe was designed for life, and the multiverse theory, which suggests ours is one of many universes with varying constants. The author leaves the interpretation to the readers, acknowledging the role of faith in understanding these profound questions.

Opinions

  • The author suggests that the precise conditions and physical constants of the Universe are not merely coincidental but are correlated in a way that allows for the existence of conscious life.
  • The article implies a sense of wonder at the complexity and specificity of the Universe's design, emphasizing the extraordinary nature of these conditions.
  • There is an acknowledgment of the limitations of current scientific understanding, as the cause of the Big Bang and the exact reason for the fine-tuning of constants remain unknown.
  • The text presents the anthropic principle as a belief that the laws of the Universe were intentionally set to enable life, while the multiverse theory offers an alternative explanation without intentional design.
  • By mentioning "Deus ex Machina," the author alludes to the idea that the Universe's fine-tuning might be seen as an unexpected, contrived solution to the problem of how life came to exist, akin to an external entity intervening in a story.
  • The author maintains a neutral stance, allowing readers to contemplate and choose between the anthropic principle, the multiverse theory, or other interpretations, recognizing that this choice may be influenced by personal faith.

Deus ex Machina — Part 2

A story of extraordinary amazement over the nature of the Universe and Life.

Image by Geralt on Pixabay

Why is the probability of our Universe occurring so insanely low, and what is special about it? I will try to briefly tell you about it, avoiding as much as possible the indigestible language of physics.

Lost symmetry

In the first micro-moments after the Big Bang due to the continuous expansion of matter and antimatter, they were created in more or less equal amounts.

Interestingly: scientists are now able to recreate the entire process down to the moment of 10 to the power of minus 43 of second after the explosion — that is, one-tenth of a millionth millionth millionth millionth millionth millionth of a second!

Each meeting of the quark and the antiquark resulted in the complete annihilation of both “particles” and the release of a photon of light.

It turns out, however, that at some point after the Big Bang, the symmetry between the amount of matter and antimatter ceased to exist, and for every billion pairs of quarks and antiquarks, for some reason, there was one extra quark. It was this fraction of all the initial, unimaginably dense matter that ultimately became the mass of the entire universe that we know today.

Where did this asymmetry come from?

Today no one can answer this question. If it had not happened, however, the universe would quickly transform into pure radiation, and stars and planets would never have formed, let alone living creatures.

Macro Scale — Constant of Gravity Value

The speed at which the Universe expanded depends largely on its initial energy and the force of gravity, which affects the resulting matter and antimatter after the Big Bang.

If the initial rate of expansion had been lower by one-thousandth of one-millionth of one-millionth of a percent (!), the Universe would have collapsed again long ago. On the other hand, if the rate of expansion were even one-millionth of a percent faster, stars and planets could not form …

Micro Scale — The value of the nuclear forces of the atom

If the nuclear forces holding protons and neutrons together in the nucleus were even slightly weaker, only hydrogen would be produced in the Universe.

If they were slightly stronger, all the hydrogen would be converted to helium. It also appears that nuclear forces are correlated enough to create the carbon that forms the basis of life on Earth.

For if they were any more valuable, all of the carbon would turn into oxygen in the stars. Could it just be a coincidence?

Mutual adjustment of Macro and Micro World

Today’s science knows more than 30 constants, the value of which is simply given. They result from experimental measurements, but cannot be deduced from any mathematical calculations.

They simply have such and no other value. These include, for example:

  • speed of light,
  • value of strong and weak nuclear interactions,
  • constants for electromagnetism,
  • Planck’s constant,
  • gravity constant,
  • or the cosmological constant.

Surprisingly they are all correlated with each other in such a way that only with such a combination a conscious life can occur in the Universe.

The probability of such one single correlation is infinitely small. Why?

Because each of them must achieve its strictly defined value, additionally correlated with the value of all the others. Suffice it to say that the cosmological constant is determined with an accuracy of:

1 : 100 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 (!!!)

Of course, the question now arises: how to interpret these discoveries?

For some, they lead to the anthropic principle, which is the belief that the laws of the Universe were carefully designed so that conscious life could arise.

For others, it leads to the theory of parallel worlds (or the Multiverse), in which our Universe is simply one of an infinite number of realities existing.

I leave the choice to you, dear readers. We enter here undoubtedly the area of faith 🙂 In both versions the question remains unanswered: WHO or what was the cause of the Big Bang(s)?

Deus ex machina, (Latin: “god from the machine”) a person or thing that appears or is introduced into a situation suddenly and unexpectedly and provides an artificial or contrived solution to an apparently insoluble difficulty — Encyclopaedia Britannica

www.empowerment-coaching.com

Blog on Personal Development

Universe
Harmony
Spirituality
Big Bang
Life
Recommended from ReadMedium