avatarDon Martin, real-life writer

Summary

The article discusses the author's concerns about the distribution of his stories to followers on a publishing platform and his plans to experiment with the subscription feature to determine if the platform's algorithm is limiting exposure to his work.

Abstract

The author, Don Martin, expresses his suspicion that the number of followers actually seeing his published work is significantly lower than his total follower count. He believes that the platform's algorithm may be showing his stories to only a fraction of his followers, potentially as low as 1%. To test this theory, Martin plans to ask his readers and followers to subscribe via email to receive his stories directly. This will allow him to compare view and read numbers before and after the increase in subscriptions. Martin acknowledges that this request could be seen as a tactic to boost his subscription numbers but insists that his intention is to validate his concerns about the algorithm's impact on content distribution and to adjust his strategy accordingly.

Opinions

  • The author is skeptical about the effectiveness of the platform's algorithm in distributing his content to his followers.
  • He suggests that the current system may be misleading, giving both writers and readers a false sense of engagement and reach.
  • Martin views the potential underperformance of the algorithm as a problem that needs to be addressed and encourages awareness and proactive measures.
  • He is prepared to issue an "artificial apology" to the algorithm if his experiment confirms that he has inadvertently offended it, implying a playful personification of the algorithm.
  • The author is willing to use unconventional methods, such as directly asking for subscriptions, to circumvent the limitations he perceives in the platform's content distribution.

Do Algorithms Have Feelings?

’Cause I must have hurt them…

Photo by Jason Leung on Unsplash

For the past couple of stories, I have remarked on the fact that quite possibly the number of people who are exposed to any given writer's stuff is but a fraction of the total number of people who followed that writer.

The math of it

i.e. If a writer is followed by x number of readers, then when he publishes a story, it is not fed to at least those X number of people, but only a fraction of his followers. Some compute to 1% or even half that.

This leaves 99% of the readers who think they follow a writer uninformed of a writer's work when they had expectations of following it.

This situation, of course, if that is the case, does the reader/fan no good and certainly does the writer no good. Actually, it borders on self-deception. It's a checking account that hasn't been balanced.

I have pointed this out, not in the spirit of being a sore loser, but rather in the spirit of “here's the problem, be aware and do something to compensate when you can.”

The first thing I intend to do is to experiment to see if this is the case.

The experiment

As everyone who reads my stories knows, I am a bit of a bean counter, so as sad as that may be, I do know my read counts I expect for a given story. I also know my number of followers and my number of subscribed followers.

Now, I must say that this is not a subscription to a newsletter, but a subscription to the service that takes each of my stories upon publication and forwards a copy to the inbox of the subscriber.

So the experiment is this. I would ask all of you reading this, especially those of you who are followers, to please hit the little envelope icon and have the stories delivered to you. If you don't like it you can unsubscribe later, but for now, I would appreciate your help in this.

Then I can simply compare my view and read numbers before and after an increase in subscriptions, and report on that to you.

I can and will continue to refine this process and keep you apprised.

Cheap Trick

Some of you may ask yourself “is this one of Martin’s cheap tricks to get his subscription rate up?”

Well, yes and no. Many of you know by now that is certainly not beneath me, but the fact is after I mouthed off about this algorithm thing last week, my views dropped significantly. Tremendously. Without any causal drop in followers.

I must have hurt its artificial feelings, so I just want to check my gut instinct.

Then if I have to, I will issue an artificial apology and concentrate more on subscriptions.

For now, thank you for your time. (my profileTwitter)

P.S. If you liked this story, you could go HERE, leave your name, and I’d be happy to send you ALL my Medium stories whenever I publish them. Even following me only gives you a very small percentage of these “stories.” So please don’t miss any! (To join the fun, support us, and be able to read unlimited MEDIUM stories, please go HERE.) And if you want to hear even more of my Medium & non-Medium stuff, you can be a part of that rough crowd HERE.

Writing
Humor
This Happened To Me
Illumination
Artificial Intelligence
Recommended from ReadMedium