avatarDevika Malik

Summary

The article discusses the severe harassment and safety issues faced by users, particularly women, in Meta's virtual reality platform, the Metaverse, and criticizes Meta's lack of effective measures to prevent such incidents.

Abstract

The web content presents a critical view of Meta's handling of safety and harassment issues within the Metaverse. It highlights a case where a woman, Nina Jane Patel, experienced virtual gang rape within seconds of entering the platform, underscoring the gravity of the situation. The article argues that the psychological impact of such virtual experiences is profound and should not be trivialized. It points out that despite the advanced nature of VR technology, it fails to provide a safer environment than traditional social media platforms. The author emphasizes that the lack of accountability and inadequate content moderation by Meta is unacceptable, especially given the realism of VR and its potential mental health implications. The piece calls for a more responsible approach to technology development, urging companies like Meta to prioritize user safety and privacy over profit and technological advancement for its own sake.

Opinions

  • The author expresses that Meta's response to incidents of harassment and abuse in the Metaverse is insufficient and dismissive, as the company views these events as part of a trial-and-error process.
  • There is a strong sentiment that the psychological trauma from virtual harassment is as valid and harmful as physical trauma, and should not be downplayed.
  • The article suggests that the anonymity provided by the Metaverse emboldens users to act out violently and abusively without fear of legal repercussions.
  • It is argued that the Metaverse, as a new technology, should be held to higher standards of safety and user protection rather than being allowed to perpetuate or worsen existing issues from other platforms.
  • The author criticizes the notion that users should tolerate abuse as part of the virtual reality experience, asserting that technology should evolve to be better and safer, not just more advanced.
  • The piece conveys a sense of urgency for ethical considerations in technology, particularly in content moderation and the balance between free speech and user well-being.
  • There is a call for tech companies to be more proactive in safeguarding user data and privacy, rather than treating users as guinea pigs in their experiments.
  • The author points out the failure of laws to keep pace with technological advancements, leading to a lack of justice

Dear Zuckerberg, You Went Too Far With This One — Humans Are Not Your Guinea Pigs

And It Gets Better as You Go On ….

Source- Unsplash

A woman recounts gang rape in the Metaverse.

Yes, these are the statements making headlines recently. And it doesn’t end here people have witnessed many instances of violence, sexual abuse and racism in the brand-new world of Metaverse.

What is Facebook/ Meta doing about this?

Actually almost nothing.

In a very diplomatic and repository way, they have saved themselves from any accountability by saying —

They believe it’s all about trial and error and they shall continue to make improvements as they learn more about how people interact.

Nina Jane Patel a Metaverse tester went on the platform thinking and hoping her experience would be fulfilling and exciting, but instead she was left shaken and in horror. In her own words, she stated that —

“WITHIN GO SECONDS OF JOINING, I WAS VERBALLY AND SEXUALLY HARASSED….3 TO 4 MALE AVATARS, WITH MALE VOICES, ESSENTIALLY, BUT VIRTUALLY GANG-RAPED MY AVATAR AND TOOK PHOTOS.”

Now does this surprise you? because it doesn’t surprise me at all

It horrifies me, enrages me but doesn’t surprise me. We are groped on trains where the world is watching these perpetrators than how can we be safe in the online world where even faces and names are different.

Just imagine the ruckus these sadistic people can induce when they are incognito and far from the reach of law and punishment.

To this many argue that nothing actually happened

But my concern is that this is about the disgusting impulses because even the thought of raping someone is as appalling and heinous as it gets.

In another statement, Nina Jane Patel stated that —

“A HORRIBLE EXPERIENCE THAT HAPPENED SO FAST AND BEFORE I COULD EVEN THINK ABOUT PUTTING THE SAFETY BARRIER IN PLACE… I FROZE. IT WAS SURREAL, IT WAS A NIGHTMARE.”

Now you may ask what’s so new about it, we notarised the same on our good old Internet on daily biases.

But this is where we go wrong.

  • We can’t be expected to face abuse and welcome violations because we were supposed to get used to it by now.
  • This is a new and advanced technology and what’s the point in being avant-garde when it can be neither better nor safer than the previous one.
  • No, it’s not the same on Metaverse as on Instagram / Facebook direct messaging. The world of Virtual reality is supposed to feel real because that’s the whole point of this machinery and this is where it shifts from the traditional forms of media and intersections.

It feels real and so is its impact and repercussions.

Here the point is:

It is always about both mentally and physically disturbance.

Our insurance may not cover it, and some people might not consider it an illness, but mental issues are real and they matter.

Really ?……….. Haven’t we learned anything?

Don’t we all know the length on which human consciousness can dip, don’t we read the horrible acts of inhuman actions and encounters decorating news all around the world?

It takes no genius to figure out that the human race can go insane and barbaric if no checks and rules are placed on them.

And since we are a civilised society and it took us thousands of years of evolution and reforms to bring us here, we must not let it go loose and in vain thanks to unthought-through technology — or as I may say human experiments.

Ethical implications of technology

Chapter one of business is customer satisfaction and well-being.

In the times of misinformation, deep fakes, and curbing digital authoritarianism the difficulties have risen for these tech brains, but their only aim must be —

Balancing content moderation and free speech.

In the genre of applied sciences, the top priority must be to create a well-studied, tested and cautious Software.

Take your tech to appropriate labs and authorities before putting it inside people’s homes and don’t make our addresses your experiment labs as per your whim and fancy.

Stealing data — Data might be oil but your consumers’ trust is oxygen.

I can’t emphasise enough how basic this demand is and yet it falls on deaf ears. It is the most primitive job of any company to safeguard the privacy, personal information and safety of individuals and yet it fails to make the list of concerns altogether.

Why does technology comes first and laws come second?

Listing the name of crimes that are a regular deed on the Internet is a waste of time, and after years of regular use and study of the same, the authorities have failed to sharpen their skills and shut those loopholes.

There is no remedy, no remorse, no redressal and no justice.

Let me clear one thing, at last, I have no issues with Mark Zuckerberg nor I am trying to target one person because this is an issue much beyond him and his practices and nor do I claim to be the expert or the final intellectual authority who’s words are supposed to be taken as it is.

In fact, this is merely a cry for help and attention from the bad boy billionaires that it would be best if they put the interest of the masses first and safeguard them, instead of being the first and filling their overflowing pockets.

It’s a question that we need to ask ourselves and these filthy rich folks —

How can they choose to improve their platform on the stake of human trauma?

Thank you

Hey, if you liked my work and would further enjoy reading more of the same — you can subscribe to my newsletter and receive the column right in your mailbox.

Technology
Startup
Culture
Metaverse
Money
Recommended from ReadMedium