avatarT. Kent Jones

Summary

The web content presents a satirical take on the variety of responses one might receive when asking for feedback on their novel.

Abstract

The article humorously illustrates the diverse and often paradoxical reactions that authors may encounter when soliciting opinions on their literary work. It captures the essence of the unpredictable nature of feedback, ranging from high praise comparing the novel to the works of famous authors like Didion and Vonnegut, to more ambiguous comments that question the novel's adherence to traditional writing norms. The piece also touches on the subjective nature of literary critique and the impact of a book's uniqueness on its reception.

Opinions

  • The novel is described as defying genre and conventional expectations, with one comment suggesting it sits alongside classic authors.
  • Some feedback suggests the novel's originality and disregard for punctuation and syntax are refreshing and innovative.
  • The work prompts a reevaluation of the creative process and the purpose of writing.
  • Responses vary from praising the book's world-building and intensity to acknowledging its potential to alter perceptions of literature.
  • There is an acknowledgment that not all feedback is straightforward; some responses are cryptic or avoid direct praise to prevent burdening the author with expectations.
  • The novel's raw and unfiltered style is seen as a bold act of courage, beyond the scope of conventional criticism.
  • Some opinions hint at the novel's length and depth, suggesting it could be just as successful if extended.
  • The experience of reading the novel is likened to a chaotic journey, unpredictable and potentially transformative.
  • The article concludes with a nod to the subjectivity of writing quality and the idea that personal style and creativity need no validation.

GENTLE READER

Cruelty-Free Answers to “Did You Like My Novel?

I couldn’t put it down

Photo by Patrick Fore on Unsplash

“I love that you don’t want everyone to “get it” immediately.”

“ Didion, Vonnegut, Wodehouse, your novel is right next to theirs. Physically.”

“Framed a certain way, eating and breathing are wildly self-indulgent, too.”

“The work is right there on the page.”

“In my writers’ group, “creepy intensity” is our highest compliment.”

“Yeah! FUCK punctuation, am I right? FUCK you too, syntax!”

“It’s its own niche. “

“Finally, someone took the “first thought, best thought” idea and ran with it for 600 pages!”

“It defies category. I mean, really defies the shit out of it.”

“When something like this comes along, clearly it’s time for my generation to step aside.”

“Anyone trying to write something that lasts should study your work very, very carefully.”

“Do I like it? The real question is, will my grandchildren’s grandchildren like it? Time can be the only real judge of this.”

“There was so much world-building, I often forgot where I was, or what I was doing, or why.”

“Acts of courage are beyond criticism.”

“That answer will take four hours and I’m on deadline!”

“Sure, I could praise it. But I don’t want to punish you with expectations.”

“Does a daisy care what I think? Celebrations of personal style don’t need validation.”

“I know so much more about you now. Wow. I had no idea.”

“ I wouldn’t cut any of it. It will be just as successful at twice the length.”

“It was like driving blind in a hailstorm, and we’ll either get out of it eventually or hit something that will kill us instantly.”

“So refreshing not to be burdened with a lot of “correct” writing.”

“I read this and thought, now that the form is smashed and defiled, we can build anything.”

“This changes how I think about writing. The creative process. The point of human striving in general, really.”

***

Thanks to Betsy Denson.

A T. Kent Jones comedy buffet awaits here.

Humor
Novel Writing
Tact
Criticism
Kent Jones
Recommended from ReadMedium
avatarAnthony (Tony/Pcunix) Lawrence 👀
I Have Decided I Cannot Vote For Camila

I just cannot

2 min read