Bono, U2, Springsteen and an All-Encompassing “Yes.”
On seeing U2 at The Sphere.

In his upcoming book There Was Nothing You Could Do, which is about how Bruce Springsteen’s “Born in the U.S.A.” album changed both his career and musical superstardom in general — a book I was honored to be asked to provide a blurb for — author Steven Hyden writes about how Springsteen, when he exploded onto the scene, allowed rock critics a narrative link between Elvis Presley and Bob Dylan. “For the (mostly white male boomer) music critics of the eighties, Bruce was a vessel into which they could pour their admiration for those older legends,” Hyden writes. “It was as if they had found the perfect rock star — he could move like Elvis and write like Dylan. The pelvis and the brain had finally been fused into one.” But there’s a pivotal moment, after Springsteen released “Nebraska” and “Darkness on the Edge of Town,” when Springsteen chooses sides. As Springsteen told the story when he inducted Dylan into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame, the first time he heard Dylan’s “Like a Rolling Stone,” he was in car with his mom. She turned to him: “That guy can’t sing.”

The critic Griel Marcus once wrote there were two sorts of rock stars: Those like Elvis, the sort of performer who “gives an all-encompassing Yes to his audience,” an all-tents monoculture superstar who will do their own thing but also believes in appealing to everyone at all times, and those like Dylan, who are resolutely themselves and would say, as Hyden puts it in the book, “Hell no” to welcoming the wrong kind of fan into their fold. Elvis (and, later, Eddie Vedder, or, for that matter, Taylor Swift) was a “all-encompassing yes” rock star; Dylan (and, later, Kurt Cobain) was a “Hell, no” rock star. (The “Hell no” is Hyden’s appellation, not Marcus’.) After the acclaimed but quiet early post-”Born to Run” albums, Springsteen decided: He was more like Elvis. He did not believe that being a rock star, or making music, or doing anything, was supposed to be exclusive, or purposely difficult. He wanted to reach the masses, to appeal to people in a way that felt universal. “Bruce could see that Bob Dylan was no uniter like Elvis,” Hyden writes in the wake of Springsteen’s mom’s comment about Dylan’s voice. “[Dylan’s] music demanded that you side with him or against him. But it did not matter either way to him.” Springsteen chose to be universal. And then he made “Born in the U.S.A.” And the rest was history.
In the moment, the “all-encompassing yes” rock stars tend to flourish: They’re the ones who sell the most records, they’re the ones who can sell out stadium tours, they’re the ones who do podcasts with Obama; the “hell no”s inevitably go through peaks and valleys in their careers, those stretches where that individual thing they stubbornly stick to goes out of style for a while. But in the long run, history rewards the “hell no”s. There is a part of us that does not want our rock stars to try too hard. I’m reminded of Obama’s great story about awarding Dylan the Presidential Medal of Freedom:
Here’s what I love about Dylan: He was exactly as you’d expect he would be. He wouldn’t come to the rehearsal; usually, all these guys are practicing before the set in the evening. He didn’t want to take a picture with me; usually all the talent is dying to take a picture with me and Michelle before the show, but he didn’t show up to that. He came in and played ‘The Times They Are A-Changin’.’ A beautiful rendition. The guy is so steeped in this stuff that he can just come up with some new arrangement, and the song sounds completely different. Finishes the song, steps off the stage — I’m sitting right in the front row — comes up, shakes my hand, sort of tips his head, gives me just a little grin, and then leaves. And that was it — then he left. That was our only interaction with him. And I thought: That’s how you want Bob Dylan, right? You don’t want him to be all cheesin’ and grinnin’ with you. You want him to be a little skeptical about the whole enterprise. So that was a real treat.”
In the end, history loves rock stars like that. Dylan still seems mysterious, removed, unknowable, which is one of the reasons Dylan, independent of the music he’s still making, remains cool. Springsteen is beloved, obviously, but as I’ve written before, you sometimes feel a little sheepish embracing everything about him: He’s so earnest that he’s easily mocked and satirized, and skeptics even see him as, well, basic. When you believe wholeheartedly that your music can change the world, well, sometimes, as Obama might put it, you have do a little cheesin’ and grinnin’. Even if you love the music, it can make you want to say “hell no.” It’s no wonder there are so few “all-encompassing yes” rock stars anymore. Rock and roll is in large part founded in rebellion; it’s certainly one of the first things that drew me to Nirvana (and, earlier, Guns N’ Roses; Axl was another “hell no” until he tried to become a “all-encompassing yes,” which is precisely when his career crashed) when I was young: Sometimes, the best lyrics are delivered with a bit of a snarl. Springsteen believes too much in people, and his own music, to be a snarler.
But in the world of “all-encompassing yes” rock stars, people who believe in that theoretical restorative and collective power of rock and roll, people who aspire to that level of (depending on your perspective) universality or pretension, Springsteen is always, always going to be beat by Bono.

I took that photo on Wednesday night, when I saw U2 play at The Sphere here in Las Vegas, where I am for the Super Bowl this week. Look at that photo. It takes a very specific brand of rock star hubris to have a video of yourself, lit as if you are a deity, broadcast 350 feet high, to 20,000 people. If you hate U2 and Bono — as a shocking number of people do — that picture is Exhibit A as to why. Even if you love U2 — and I love U2 — you have to admit maybe it’s a bit much.
But Bono, and U2, have always been a bit much. That’s what makes them who they are. And as I get older, I find I’m a lot less interested in snarls than I used to be.
The Sphere is a truly breathtaking piece of technology, a massive amphitheater but also a $2.8 billion art project. U2 has always dedicated itself to having ambitious, even pretentious live shows — the last time I saw them before Wednesday was back in 1997, when they played at the Los Angeles Coliseum and Bono came out of a giant mirror-ball lemon — so even as the members of the band enter their 60s, the grandiosity of The Sphere had to have been irresistible. The idea of a band like U2 setting up a residency in Vegas seems awfully strange to anyone who remembers the urgency of the band in ’80s and ’90s and self-seriousness of the band since — and it clearly seems a little strange to the band, considering how many Elvis references there are in the show — but then you see the crazy-ass shit they’ve come up with and it makes sense. Seriously, look at this:







