avatarUlf Wolf

Summary

The website content discusses the concept of Atman being equivalent to Brahman, emphasizing the ultimate truth that transcends matter, energy, space, and time, and highlights the importance of intent and awareness in the context of Buddhism and the Chāndogya Upanishad.

Abstract

The text delves into the philosophical and spiritual notion that the individual self (Atman) is identical to the universal self (Brahman), a principle found in Hindu philosophy. It draws parallels with Buddhist teachings, particularly the concept of Sunnatā, or Emptiness, which is beyond the confines of space and time. The author, Wolfstuff, reflects on the Chāndogya Upanishad's explanation of how the universe originated from a singular Being (Brahman) that multiplied into many selves (Atmans) through intention. The essay posits that the separation of selves is an illusion, made possible only by the constructs of space and time, and that the ego is the barrier between the inner self (Atman) and the universal consciousness (Brahman). The text suggests that by shedding the ego, one can realize the unity of all existence.

Opinions

  • The author believes that the ultimate truth is beyond the physical constructs of matter, energy, space, and time, and can be understood through the lens of Emptiness or the Void in Buddhism.
  • Intent and Awareness are considered the only enduring elements in this emptiness, with intention being the driving force behind creation and existence.
  • The Chāndogya Upanishad is referenced as providing a clear explanation of the origin of the universe and the multiplicity of selves from a singular source, Brahman.
  • The concept of Nirvana in Buddhism is aligned with the idea of Emptiness, suggesting that it is a state beyond space and time, where separation is impossible.
  • The Buddhist doctrine of non-self (annatā) is interpreted as indicating the impossibility of separate selves due to the lack of space in which to be separate.
  • The ego is viewed as a self-centered entity that maintains the illusion of separation between the individual self (Atman) and the universal self (Brahman), likened to a bubble in space.
  • The author implies that overcoming the ego leads to the realization of the oneness of Atman and Brahman, bringing about a state of well-being.

Atman = Brahman

There is No Other Way

Atman=Brahman

Beyond Matter Energy Space Time There’s no where-when to separate

The ultimate truth. In Buddhism, it is known as Sunnatā, Emptiness, the Void. According to the Buddha, it is beyond space and beyond time. It is beyond, period. Or as Gertrude Stein would have put it, there is no “there” there.

But this apparent nothingness harbors two enduring elements: Intent and Awareness — this and nothing else.

How it all began: I think that the Chāndogya Upanishad (6.2.1–3) nails it:

In the beginning, this world was just Being [i.e., Brahman] — one only, without a second. And it thought to itself — “Let me become many; let me multiply myself.” Each little self an Atman.

The vital truth is that the spirit does by intending. If there is no stuff around to act upon and/or through then intention alone is the doing.

Brahman, the only, without a second, intended and, voila, he’s many.

Today, he’s very, very, very, very, very many.

But here’s the rub, in order to become many, Brahman, the one only without a second had first to intend/invent space, for without it there would be no separation of one atman from the next and so, in a spaceless void, would still remain just the one. Space, then, is a requisite for multitude, for without it there is nowhere, nowhen, noway for separation or difference.

Nirvana, says the Buddha (and 2,500 years of commentary and musings, especially in the Mahayana camp, agree) is Emptiness and is beyond space and time. There really is no there there. And without a there, without space (and time, since for space to endure, well, it needs a clock), nothing can be separate.

That is how, these days, I view annatā, the Buddhist doctrine of non-self: Ultimately, separate selves are simply impossible: there’s no there (i.e., no space) to be separate in.

And I believe that in our very physical world, the self that insists on existing is best viewed as the ego, the somewhat selfish creature that insists on surviving as creature in space through time — having lost sight of the deeper truth that says that the only thing separating atman, the inner stillness, from Brahman, the outer stillness, is this precious ego, like a bubble in space. Same space inside as outside, separated by that soapy mental film we call ego.

Shed that and all will be well.

© Wolfstuff

P.S. If you like what you’ve read here and would like to contribute to the creative motion, as it were, you can do so via PayPal: here.

Atman
Brahman
Space
Separation
Identities
Recommended from ReadMedium