avatarMark Rockford Winsor

Free AI web copilot to create summaries, insights and extended knowledge, download it at here

610

Abstract

J</b>udge you harshly.</p><p id="170f"><b>K</b>nowing that makes it effortless for a</p><p id="99a0"><b>L</b>ayman. Though the very lack of struggling <i>often</i> leads to</p><p id="2380"><b>M</b>ediocrity. And <i>that</i>, my friends, is definitely</p><p id="ffab"><b>N</b>ot something to aspire to.</p><p id="7576"><b>O</b>pine if you will, because</p><p id="8720"><b>P</b>eople often do, but I would advise you to</p><p id="a83d"><b>Q</b>uell that instinct. For it will lead you to</p><p id="ddf5"><b>R</b>uination. As well as a general malaise and</p><p id="5e06"><b>S</b>ophistry in your arguments. A</p><

Options

p id="012c"><b>T</b>elling lack of <i>depth</i> which will</p><p id="0ed6"><b>U</b>ndergird your position with a paucity of</p><p id="b5dd"><b>V</b>erve and strength.</p><p id="d147"><b>W</b>ould you trade that for a few easy style points?</p><p id="8e7a"><b>X</b>erxes wouldn’t. And I don’t believe</p><p id="52f4"><b><i>Y</i></b><i>ou</i> would settle for <i>anything</i> less than the meaningful, <i>true</i> feeling of</p><p id="598d"><b>Z</b>en achieved by winning your debate on solid, intellectual foundations.</p><p id="43aa">Be good everyone,</p><p id="31c6">-Mark Rockford Winsor-</p></article></body>

As Per The Usual, An Analysis In Alphabetical Notation ….

As per the usual

Becoming more than a

Centrist in a political

Debate is relatively

Easy, because

Forming a opinion is often based on emotions, which are strong. that’s a

Given. The hard part though; is

Having the courage of your convictions.

Its easy among friends, they won’t

Judge you harshly.

Knowing that makes it effortless for a

Layman. Though the very lack of struggling often leads to

Mediocrity. And that, my friends, is definitely

Not something to aspire to.

Opine if you will, because

People often do, but I would advise you to

Quell that instinct. For it will lead you to

Ruination. As well as a general malaise and

Sophistry in your arguments. A

Telling lack of depth which will

Undergird your position with a paucity of

Verve and strength.

Would you trade that for a few easy style points?

Xerxes wouldn’t. And I don’t believe

You would settle for anything less than the meaningful, true feeling of

Zen achieved by winning your debate on solid, intellectual foundations.

Be good everyone,

-Mark Rockford Winsor-

Humor
Poetry
Analysis
Intellectual
Funny
Recommended from ReadMedium