APPLE
Apple Is So Wrong Right Now
And it is ticking me off
I’m an Apple fanboy and sheeple. I have an iPhone, an Apple Watch, an iPad Pro, an M1 MacBook Air, an Apple TV box, multiple AirPod Pros, HomePods, and more. But this right here is an anti-Apple rant.
I’ve ranted before. I regularly update this story about Apple disappointment:
I even worked at an Apple store for a few years after closing my Unix support business of over 30 years. Overall, it was a pleasant experience, although my age made working shifting schedules difficult.
I own around 600 shares of Apple stock, most of which I bought years ago. I can’t complain about the increase in value there.
But this kind of stuff makes me angry:
So does this:
Why? Because it damages the brand, which affects the share price and could affect the quality of Apple products.
Union Busting
When I worked at Apple, one of the back-pats given to the retail stores was to call them “The face of our business.”
One of my managers wisecracked, “We are the face of the business, but they won’t give us any makeup.”
Many retail store employees think of themselves as neglected stepchildren. The pay is high by retail standards, but nothing like corporate pay. Benefits are good, but when I worked there, corporate employees got better bennies.
Retail is a tough job. Nights, weekends, holidays: you have to work. At Apple, you aren’t just passing stuff through a checkout scanner or searching the racks for a size three in blue. You need a fair amount of technical knowledge even if you are a salesperson and a lot of tech savvy if you work at the Genius Bar.
In a busy store, stress builds fast. Is it any wonder that retail employees have wanted to make a union?
Apple reacted badly. They hired a law firm known for union busting and have done everything within the law (and possibly outside) to stop organizing efforts.
Does that say you care about the people working there?
In the comments, Chris Hornberger mentioned that corporations are required by law to “push back” against unions. That’s true, but what was the impetus for those laws? Were they demanded by employees or stockholders? Does the law say they must make every effort even if it gets them called to court?
I quit Apple because of COVID, but I was getting ready to quit anyway because of mandatory night work. My wife isn’t well; she needed me at home nights. My age was working against me too: I fell asleep at the wheel twice while driving home after 10:00 PM closings. I only drove off the road both times, once on my own lawn, once on a highway on-ramp, with no damage to anything either time, but I was becoming afraid of what could happen.
Did Apple care? Nope. Work the scheduled nights or quit.
This is not a good look for a company that claims to value its employees.
Work from home
Apple has lost some of the best of the best because of their stubborn insistence on coming to work.
How do I know it has been the best of the best? Because those are the people most in demand; the people who can get a job that will let them work from home.
One Apple manager estimated he could lose 30 percent of his staff because of this.
I have relatives who work at companies who make hardware and software where the entire engineering team works from home. Apple loses employees to companies like that.
Does this intransigence help add software features? Does it help find bugs? Does it do anything good at all?
As a user and as a stockholder, I think it’s idiotic. Idiotic and harmful.
