avatarJames Marinero, MSc, MBA

Summary

The undefined website discusses the use of AI-enabled sentiment analysis by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) in partnership with FilterLabs.AI to gauge Russian public opinion on the Ukraine War, revealing insights into the effectiveness of Kremlin propaganda and potential shifts in national sentiment.

Abstract

The undefined website delves into an innovative approach to understanding public sentiment in Russia regarding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. It details the collaboration between the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) and FilterLabs.AI, highlighting the use of advanced AI techniques to analyze social media posts, news articles, and online content. This AI-driven sentiment analysis aims to identify patterns in Russian public opinion, which could indicate the Kremlin's influence over its populace through propaganda. The article suggests that despite efforts to control the narrative, there is evidence of increasing skepticism and negative sentiment towards the war outside of major population centers like Moscow and St. Petersburg. The findings from this analysis, as reported by Politico, point to a possible decline in the ability of Putin's regime to manage public perception of the conflict, which could have implications for his political legitimacy and power.

Opinions

  • Sentiment analysis, while sophisticated, is compared to "snake oil" due to potential biases in data collection and the phrasing of questions affecting the results.
  • The author questions the reliability of sentiment analysis given the societal pressures in Russia that may prevent honest expression in digital spaces.
  • There is skepticism about the representativeness of the data, as it only reflects the opinions of those who actively express themselves digitally.
  • The article implies that a shift towards negative sentiment in regions like the Republic of Buryatia could signal a broader dissatisfaction with the war and the government's narrative.
  • The effectiveness of Kremlin propaganda is depicted as fluctuating, with its impact waning over time, suggesting a potential erosion of trust in state institutions.
  • The author suggests that AI sentiment analysis could be a valuable tool for detecting changes in public opinion that might otherwise be obscured by state control and propaganda efforts.

Ukraine War

Polling Putin’s Problems: AI and the Russian Public

I was intrigued by a story about how AI can assess Russian public opinion — and yes, it sounds like snake oil, but…

Image credit: By Clark Stanley — https://www.nlm.nih.gov/exhibition/ephemera/medshow.html, attributed to:Clark Stanley‘s Snake Oil Liniment,True Life in the Far West,200 page pamphlet, illus.,Worcester, Massachusetts, c. 1905,23 x 14.8 cm., Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=47338529

It’s called sentiment analysis.

Not sentient — it’s AI and that’s not sentient. Yet.

For the past year, the Center for Strategic and International Studies has worked with FilterLabs.AI, a Massachusetts-based data analytics firm, to track local sentiment across Russia using AI-enabled sentiment analysis. So says the story in Politico.

And that got me wondering. The first obvious question is how in hell can they ‘track local sentiment across Russia’ ?

Sentiment analysis

Well, you could check out B Kean here on Medium who has an ‘in’ to Russian sentiments, but let’s go with the data…

Sentiment analysis (also known as opinion mining or emotion AI) is the use of natural language processing, text analysis, computational linguistics, and biometrics to systematically identify, extract, quantify, and study affective states and subjective information. (Wikimedia)

When I got my marketing qualifications and worked in the sector too many years ago, the nearest we got to this was focus groups and regular customer opinion surveys. There was no such thing as digital marketing apart from early email campaigns at 4,800 bps.

Things have certainly moved on. And not only in marketing.

Now we have a war underway with drones, cyber and social media in addition to all the usual weapons and tactics…

…and AI, on several fronts.

But the Wikipedia entry for ‘sentiment analysis’ still comes back to questions — and the construction of questions for market/opinion surveys is both an art and a science. Basically, you can get any answers you want if you phrase the question in the right way — and if you choose your respondents.

It really is snake oil.

If however, you are seriously trying to assess the mood of the Russian peoples (there are more than just White Russians) then you can’t mess about with semantics.

And you don’t bother with questions.

These are meta surveys of Russian sentiment.

AI surveys.

Artificial intelligence?

By using AI to analyse social media posts, news articles, and other sources of online content, influencing and debate, the AI’s sentiment analysis algorithms can identify patterns and trends in public opinion, and provide arguably valuable insights into the issues that are most important to those who express themselves digitally.

That’s my bolding — I’ll come back to that a bit later.

And we come back to the basics of AI. How good is the training data?

In the context of this story, and the recognised reluctance of Russians to be truthful in such a frightening society, then how can we attach any real significance to the results?

Another concern is the potential for bias in the algorithms used for sentiment analysis. Like all machine learning algorithms, sentiment analysis algorithms are only as good as the data they are trained on.

That’s the training data issue. Times two.

Polling methodology

The Politico story tells us that:

Standard polling often concentrates on population centers including Moscow and St. Petersburg, which can skew national averages. Outside of those major cities, a more negative picture emerges. Our analysis shows that the Kremlin is increasingly unable to control public sentiment outside major cities with national propaganda.

Who’s doing the polling?

No one.

It’s a meta analysis process.

Propaganda waves

The AI system of Filter Labs is trawling and scraping all available online documents, social media posts, Telegram channels and the like and analysing the text.

It is looking for trends.

According to the ‘pollsters’, the propaganda churned out by the Kremlin appears to follow ‘waves’.

Kremlin propagandists work iteratively, piloting slightly different messages successively and rolling them out in waves when their analysis signals that they are needed. Since the invasion, Russian state-sponsored propaganda waves elevated public sentiment toward the war for an average of 14 days across all regions and topics. — Politico (ibid)

Filter Labs has (as of 26 February 2023) concluded that Moscow’s local media is great deal more variable than the Russian national media is in general.

Also, they took the far eastern Republic of Buryatia as a sample area outside of White Russia. Many draftees for the war have been drawn from there as part of Putin’s plan to keep the war pain out of the big cities by using the expendables from the backwoods.

And yes, Buryatia really does exist — it’s not a republic out of a Marx Brothers film.

Credit: By File:Map of Russia — Buryatia.svg: Stasyan117derivative work: Seryo93 — This file was derived from: Map of Russia — Buryatia.svg:, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=63459891. Author overlay of name Buryatia

Putin’s regime less able to control the narratives

Filter labs presents data which appears to show that Putin’s regime is growing less and less able to control the narratives about the war. That was in 2022.

There are 4 distinct narrative boosts, which decrease in effectiveness as the war progresses. The last two [propaganda] cycles return to localized minimums much more quickly, as the overall trend continues to grow more negative.

That means that the local people are becoming more sceptical about the Kremlin’s messaging at a national level.

The natives are becoming restless, it seems.

Conclusion

AI-enabled sentiment data analysis can provide a window into how Russians feel and how fickle public sentiment is.

And that pesky bit that I bolded earlier — ‘those who express themselves digitally’.

It’s not a random sample of Russian public opinion — and that’s not usually good for high confidence in results being generally applicable.

However, if the online sentiment moves negatively for Putin, then that’s hardly likely to be something that his troll farms have worked at, is it?

If online sentiment moves positively, then we’ll read that with a higher degree of suspicion.

If the results from Filter Labs and Center for Strategic and International Studies are reliable then…

This poses internal threats to Putin’s legitimacy and thus his power. It also signals an inherent mistrust of state institutions that will be part of Russian society — especially outside of Moscow — well after Putin’s reign ends, whenever that may be. — politico.com

About me: If you follow me I guarantee variety in your inbox with some unusual perspectives! I write on a wide range of topics including humor, tech, space, geopolitics and travel, together with daily news events and the minutiae of my daily life living on a boat. Yes, I really do live on a boat (some readers don’t believe that). I also write about…

…snake oil

If you appreciate stories like these and want to support other writers and me, consider signing up to become a Medium member. It’s only $5 a month, giving you unlimited access to incredible stories on Medium. If you sign up using my link below, I’ll earn a small commission at no extra cost to you.

Or maybe just buy me a coffee? and tell me what you liked reading (or not)…

James Marinero’s novels are available at his Gumroad bookstore. Also at Amazon and Apple
Ukraine War
Russia
Opinion Polls
Putin Ukraine Invasion
Russian News
Recommended from ReadMedium