avatarGlenn Stok

Summary

Glenn Stok provides an updated review of Simily, detailing ongoing issues, corrections to previous misinformation, and the platform's response to user feedback.

Abstract

Glenn Stok has completed his first month on Simily and has been actively reviewing the platform, pointing out inaccuracies in other reviews, such as the misleading information about the founders' anonymity and the platform's functionality. He highlights the use of open-source WordPress code for Simily and expresses concerns about security for subscriptions. Stok corrects previous misunderstandings about Simily's payment for views, including external views, after a Zoom meeting with the founders. He also addresses an article by Warren Patterson, which initially seemed accurate but later required correction. Stok notes some improvements, like the addition of quick links to "My Groups" and "My Earnings," but also a persistent bug preventing free account holders from utilizing their five free reads due to the reads being consumed by the writer's own proofreading. He lists pending bugs and suggestions for the platform, emphasizing the need for support of canonical links, notification emails for new followers, and clear identification of paid subscribers.

Opinions

  • The author is skeptical about the reliability and transparency of Simily, as evidenced by his investigation into the founders' hidden identity and the platform's use of open-source code.
  • Stok is committed to providing accurate information, as shown by his multiple corrections and updates based on direct communication with Simily's founders.
  • He is critical of the misinformation spread by other articles and authors regarding Simily's functionality and payment structure.
  • The author appreciates the responsiveness of Simily's team to some of his suggestions, such as the addition of quick links, indicating a willingness to make user-friendly improvements.
  • Frustration is evident regarding unresolved bugs, particularly those affecting the user experience for free account holders and the misleading display of followers.
  • Stok values the security of personal information, expressing reservations about entering credit card details on an open-source platform.
  • He acknowledges the complexity of Simily's payment structure, which includes views from both paying and unpaid subscribers, and emphasizes the importance of clear communication regarding payment policies.

Simily Review (Updated February 18, 2022)

A New Month With Simily’s Problems

Pending bugs and suggestions

Screenshot of my Simily profile

So, I completed my first month on Simily and have written several reviews already. Some of you might be wondering why I post stories on Simily and engage in its forum groups when I’m so pessimistic about the site.

I do that to find out how the platform functions so that I can give you an honest and accurate report.

Many other articles give a lot of incorrect and misleading information about Simily. For example, they never checked the WHOIS database to see how the founders hid their identity. I have yet to see anyone else mention that in their reviews.

What about all the stories telling you to put all your effort into it. Have you checked those authors’ profiles on Simily to see if they published any articles or completed their profile yet? Many of them never interact in the forum groups.

And what about their research and analysis of the platform. How many even know it’s based on the open-source code provided by WordPress. Personally, I would not feel comfortable putting my credit card information on an open-source platform to buy an unlimited subscription.

UPDATE Feb 18, 2022: During my Zoom meeting with Simily founders, I learned that they use Stripe to collect credit card information for subscriptions, which is a secure payment processor.

A major flaw in many other reviews is the mention of Simily paying you for all views, including external views. T̶h̶e̶y̶ ̶d̶o̶n̶’̶t̶,̶ ̶a̶n̶d̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶y̶ ̶n̶e̶v̶e̶r̶ ̶s̶a̶i̶d̶ ̶t̶h̶a̶t̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶y̶ ̶d̶o̶.̶

CORRECTION Feb 18, 2022: I asked about this during our Zoom meeting and they agreed they need to change the wording under “How it Works” because that was misleading. The fact is that they do include external views for payments at this time. But that will change later.

Finally, I saw this article by Warren Patterson where he gave his readers the correct information. Simily says they pay for views from both paying and unpaid subscribers. But that clearly excludes non-subscribers? T̶h̶e̶ ̶f̶a̶c̶t̶ ̶i̶s̶ ̶y̶o̶u̶ ̶o̶n̶l̶y̶ ̶g̶e̶t̶ ̶p̶a̶i̶d̶ ̶w̶h̶e̶n̶ ̶a̶ ̶s̶u̶b̶s̶c̶r̶i̶b̶e̶r̶ ̶r̶e̶a̶d̶s̶ ̶y̶o̶u̶r̶ ̶a̶r̶t̶i̶c̶l̶e̶s̶.̶ ̶A̶n̶d̶ ̶W̶a̶r̶r̶e̶n̶ ̶c̶o̶r̶r̶e̶c̶t̶l̶y̶ ̶b̶r̶o̶u̶g̶h̶t̶ ̶t̶h̶a̶t̶ ̶t̶o̶ ̶h̶i̶s̶ ̶r̶e̶a̶d̶e̶r̶s̶’̶ ̶a̶t̶t̶e̶n̶t̶i̶o̶n̶.̶ ̶G̶r̶e̶a̶t̶ ̶w̶o̶r̶k̶,̶ ̶W̶a̶r̶r̶e̶n̶!̶

CORRECTION Feb 18, 2022: Oops, as it turns out, Warren was wrong too.

What Has Been Fixed (or Not)

Now that a new month has begun, I noticed I had five free reads again since I only have the free limited subscription. Unfortunately, I already used them up by writing another story and proofreading it a few times. Simily still didn’t fix that bug that I reported a month ago. So even the people with free accounts cannot read five stories from other writers.

I noticed they added a quick link to “My Groups” and “My Earnings” under the pull-down menu, as I suggested last month. I informed them how it took several clicks to get to those places. So now it takes just one click.

At least that means they have a programmer on board who can make changes to the platform. But that’s the only thing I saw that was changed. They didn’t fix any of the bugs that are annoying everyone.

Pending Bugs (Not a Complete List)

  • We still can’t see who is following us. It erroneously shows all members.
  • We still can’t read five articles with the free subscription since they get used up by writing stories.
  • When viewing threads in forum groups, the latest posts don’t appear. But if you click “View previous comments” then the last ones show up. That’s backwards!
  • When posting a link to another Simily story, the system displays “403 -Forbidden” error banner. The user can remove that banner by clicking “Remove Preview,” but many users don’t notice that.

Pending Suggestions

  • Add support of canonical links.
  • Send a notification email when someone follows a user.
  • Indicate who is a paid subscriber (as Medium does).

See my other reviews:

Simily
Writing For Money
Content Platform
Content Writing Platform
Writing Platforms
Recommended from ReadMedium