avatarRobin Wilding 💎

Summary

The author, a Medium writer, argues that non-member writers on Medium's Partner Program contribute to a 30% reduction in potential earnings for member writers.

Abstract

The author, a Medium writer, expresses their admiration for Medium's potential for professional writers and the impressive rates it pays based on read time. However, they point out that the Medium payout pool for writers could be 30% higher if all writers were required to be members. The author explains that non-member writers are paid by members, effectively reducing the total earnings available to member writers. The author supports this claim by analyzing their own articles' traffic and concludes that around 30% of their views come from non-member writers. They suggest that Medium should require all writers in the Partner Program to be members and address potential loopholes in the paywall restrictions.

Opinions

  • The author believes that Medium's Partner Program offers impressive rates for professional writers.
  • They argue that non-member writers in the Partner Program contribute to a 30% reduction in potential earnings for member writers.
  • The author suggests that Medium should require all writers in the Partner Program to be members.
  • They claim that non-member writers are not truly valuing the platform since they are not supporting others by being a member.
  • The author identifies a loophole in the paywall restrictions on Facebook, which allows non-members to read articles without limitations.
  • They argue that Medium should address this loophole and any others that may exist.
  • The author believes that non-member writers are using the platform parasitically and should not be paid by member writers.

Are You Missing 28.2% of Your Earnings Too?

Something is afoot…

That’s 30% more money to buy white suits and pocket squares with…or whatever rich people buy with their money . Photo by Rolando Brando from Pexels.

I’m going to start this by saying that I love Medium (practically sycophantically), and the potential it offers to its users. As someone working in the professional-writing world, I can tell you that the rates it pays based on read time are quite impressive. It really is unparalleled.

The truth is I’m impressed and happy with what we can earn on the platform. I’d be here even if there were no Medium Partner Program (albeit I’d post less). I think the rates are really good, but I know many, many, many people disagree with me. I’ve heard the payments referred to as peanuts, but I think it’s more like macadamia (rich people nuts) money.

But we are missing almost 30% of our earnings.

The Medium payout pool of funds going to the platform’s writers — should be 30% higher. Ooh, a payout pool sounds fun — I’m picturing waves of dollars floating in a grotto-style swimming pool. Fuck yeah.

I am the master of creating ultra-realistic graphics — Muah ha ha! Do not ask me how much time I spent creating this shitty image. Photo by Chelsea Gates on Unsplash

So, why are we missing almost 30% of earnings? Well, here’s why:

Writers aren’t required to be members.

If all writers (specifically those in the Partner Program) had to be members there would be about a 30% uptick in payouts / the money available in the money grotto. Because paying members are paying 30% of their money to non-member writers.

How I Came Up with 30%

Ok, I rounded up a little — the actual number is just over 28% because math makes my brain bucket hurt and I don’t have the exact number (the closest accuracy I have is 28.2%). But I came to that by seeing that almost 30% of my views are external, but in a very particular pattern.

Here’s what I’m talking about (all screenshots by author):

*Pay attention to how the blue external-traffic line follows the green internal traffic line

If you average out the percentages of external traffic from those 5 articles it is 28.2%. I feel that with the total views of those articles, this is a fair representation.

Did you notice how the amount of external traffic parallels internal? If this were a horror flick this is where the narrator would say ‘the call is coming from inside the house!’ That traffic is coming from Medium itself.

Now let’s look at the source of that traffic:

Screenshots by author. Put together by an absolutely awe-inspiring, Herculean-like feat of Photoshop.

The screenshots above just show that the traffic didn’t come from external sources like Google or Facebook. And I wish I had hundreds of people on my email list (I don’t — not even close). It indeed comes from within the house. I think 30% of that Medium traffic is unpaid members.

External traffic is normal of course. Here’s the thing — all those articles are meta articles about Medium. Nobody is googling that, people who are only readers don’t give a shit — at least not to the tune of 30% of people on here.

It is Medium writers.

It is Medium writers learning about Medium news…and how to buy a Ferrari from earnings in two months.

Get a Medium membership people — I’m only 30% away from my Medium Ferrari. Photo by Drink Drippy on Unsplash

You Don’t Have to Be a Member to Earn Money?

Did you know that you don’t have to be a paid member to earn on Medium? To some of you…surprise! It’s true. Medium doesn’t require you to be a member to extract money from the Partner Program.

It’s right on their homepage for creators:

Screenshot by author of Medium.com/earn

But uh….why?

Why does Medium allow people to earn but not be a member? Do these people really value the platform? They aren’t supporting others. They’re taking out without putting their dollar in the pot (well, five dollars).

This not only gives other creators in the Partner Program more competition for those dollars (which is fair — this platform is competitive and that’s the nature of business) — but from a smaller pool.

If my numbers above are correct, the 70% of us who are paying our five buckaroos are funding the 30%. Those non-paying members are making the pool smaller twice over, by not paying into it — and taking money out of it.

It’s time Medium, to have all MPP people be members — the rest of us have fancy-shmancy watches to buy. Photo by Gilles De Muynck on Unsplash

Why Can Non-Members Read So Many Articles?

If 30% of my traffic is non-members — why/how are they getting so many article reads? Yes, it could be a different 26–30% of viewers every time purely coincidentally…but I question coincidences.

I know there’s a hole in the paywall restrictions on Facebook. Lesley Dewar alerted us it, and wrote an article about it. She is right, you can open Medium links on Facebook and read as many articles as you want, without being logged in — without the paywall limitations kicking in.

Lesley says you can clap too, but I didn’t find that to be the case on my iPhone or iPad. Yeah yeah, my basic-bitch ass is part of the brainwashed Apple Illuminati.

Medium — What’s Up?

So uh, Medium — can you plug that hole? There might be other holes too though, because somehow people are reading my articles too without a membership. And I don’t post my articles on Facebook.

But also…can you have everyone in the program be a paid member?

I don’t see the point of letting people use the platform parasitically and having your valued members pay them.

Medium
New Writers Welcome
Ideas
Earnings
Writing
Recommended from ReadMedium