avatarSendoh Bun

Free AI web copilot to create summaries, insights and extended knowledge, download it at here

4362

Abstract

re their encounters and engage with a global audience. Channels like “Audit the Audit,” “News Now Houston,” and “High Desert Community Watch” have gained substantial followings, with millions of views on their videos. These auditors have become celebrities within the YouTube community, attracting both supporters and critics.</p><p id="a3fd">One prominent example of First Amendment audits in action can be found in the following YouTube video :</p> <figure id="67f2"> <div> <div> <img class="ratio" src="http://placehold.it/16x9"> <iframe class="" src="https://cdn.embedly.com/widgets/media.html?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fembed%2FDT2baYDdt8s%3Ffeature%3Doembed&amp;display_name=YouTube&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DDT2baYDdt8s&amp;image=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FDT2baYDdt8s%2Fhqdefault.jpg&amp;key=a19fcc184b9711e1b4764040d3dc5c07&amp;type=text%2Fhtml&amp;schema=youtube" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="480" width="854"> </div> </div> </figure></iframe></div></div></figure><p id="3b1b">In my personal view, despite the unprofessional response from the police officer in this video, the auditor seemed to be excessively provoking them. This behavior is somewhat perplexing and, in my opinion, unacceptable. It is crucial to remember that even though First Amendment audits serve a significant purpose in maintaining governmental accountability and educating the public about their constitutional rights, there should be a level of respect and understanding maintained during these interactions. Extreme provocation can potentially cloud the intended message and purpose of these audits, creating unnecessary tension and conflict.</p><figure id="621a"><img src="https://cdn-images-1.readmedium.com/v2/resize:fit:800/1*KJUyQTNlBxn8ZjrbDYhNag.jpeg"><figcaption></figcaption></figure><h1 id="8ea1">First Amendment Audits Legal Controversies</h1><p id="13d7">First Amendment auditors have sparked debates about the boundaries of free speech and the role of citizens in holding public officials accountable. Supporters argue that these audits promote transparency and government accountability, while critics question the motives of auditors and the potential disruption they may cause.</p><p id="20fa">The legality of First Amendment audits is a subject of as being said before is in ongoing debate. While auditors argue that they are exercising their constitutional rights, law enforcement agencies have raised concerns about potential interference with police operations and public safety. Courts have grappled with balancing the right to record in public spaces with legitimate law enforcement interests.</p><p id="88d3">In light of the ongoing debate surrounding the legality and appropriateness of First Amendment audits, it’s beneficial to seek insight from experts in the field. One such voice on Medium.com belongs to <a href="undefined">Kemal M. Lepschoq, LL.M. 👨🏻‍🎓⚖️</a>; while I do not have expertise in the law field, I think lawyers like Kemal could provide a valuable perspective on this complex issue more than me.</p><figure id="d1df"><img src="https://cdn-images-1.readmedium.com/v2/resize:fit:800/1*KJUyQTNlBxn8ZjrbDYhNag.jpeg"><figcaption></figcaption></figure><h1 id="84e6">The Role of the First Amendment on Free Speech</h1><p id="0c34">Some argue that First Amendment audits are essential for preserving and promoting free speech rights, as they serve as a check on government power. However, others contend that auditors’ confrontational tactics and the potential for escalations may undermine the public’s perception of genuine free speech advocacy.</p><p id="21db">While First Amendment audits may be well-intentioned, there is growing concern that they may unintentionally foster a societal attitude of mistrust toward law enforcement. These audits, while promoting transparency, can inadvertently send a message that all law enforcement actions are suspect. This could potentially lead the public to form a negative or adversarial view of police officers and other officials, undermining their authority and complicating their efforts to maintain public safety.</p><p id="7144">It’s important to note that the concept of First Amendment audits is relatively new and not thoroughly r

Options

esearched or studied. Therefore, while it stands as a potent tool for exercising constitutional rights, its broader implications on society’s perception of law enforcement and public safety need careful examination and thoughtful discussion.</p><figure id="311e"><img src="https://cdn-images-1.readmedium.com/v2/resize:fit:800/1*KJUyQTNlBxn8ZjrbDYhNag.jpeg"><figcaption></figcaption></figure><h1 id="9f57">First Amendment Audits & Digital Media</h1><p id="2f05">As First Amendment audits continue to gain attention, their future in the digital media landscape remains uncertain. YouTube’s evolving policies, legal challenges, and public sentiment will play a significant role in shaping the direction of these audits. It is likely that we will see continued discussions regarding the balance between constitutional rights and public safety concerns.</p><p id="c0df">My hope is for the auditors to recognize the collective impression they create and the consequential societal impact. While these audits seem to be a legitimate exercise of civil liberties, they also contribute significantly to shaping public opinion. Therefore, a measure of caution and responsibility is necessary.</p><p id="25f3">Auditors should be mindful of the potential for their activities to inadvertently cast law enforcement in an adversarial light, fostering an environment of mistrust. My hope is, therefore, that they will exercise their rights with a balanced approach, recognizing the weight of their contributions to public opinion and the need for this practice to be judiciously monitored and controlled.</p><figure id="d641"><img src="https://cdn-images-1.readmedium.com/v2/resize:fit:800/1*KJUyQTNlBxn8ZjrbDYhNag.jpeg"><figcaption></figcaption></figure><h1 id="6258">Conclusion</h1><p id="77dc">First Amendment auditors have carved out a unique place on YouTube, captivating audiences with their audacious encounters and challenging the boundaries of free speech. However, the impact and consequences of these audits extend beyond YouTube, raising important questions about the balance between individual rights, government accountability, and public safety. As the digital media landscape continues to evolve, the future of First Amendment audits remains uncertain. Only time will tell how this trend will shape the broader discourse on free speech and citizen engagement with those in power.</p><p id="cadf">I firmly believe that while we need to address the issue of police misconduct, it is important that our methods do not exacerbate the problem. Police officers are as susceptible to stress and mental health issues as any other citizen. First Amendment auditors pushing law enforcement officers too far may not only be counterproductive, but it could also put unnecessary strain on these public servants, who have families and personal lives just like the rest of us. In the pursuit of justice, we must remember to extend empathy and understanding towards all parties involved. It is only by doing so that we can foster a fair and just society.</p><figure id="7625"><img src="https://cdn-images-1.readmedium.com/v2/resize:fit:800/1*KJUyQTNlBxn8ZjrbDYhNag.jpeg"><figcaption></figcaption></figure><h1 id="9e53">Author’s Note</h1><p id="320a">Thank you for reading my story. Here is some information about <a href="https://readmedium.com/editorial-bio-of-ali-alzahrani-b78c1a23fcbc?sk=1150094bb674aaa7701f61972f40b86c"><b>my background</b></a>. 🙏Consider sharing and participating in the conversation if this content speaks to you. For any queries, collaborations, or comments, reach out to me at <a href="[email protected]"><b>[email protected]</b></a>. Thank you for supporting my work!</p><div id="c94c" class="link-block"> <a href="https://medium.com/@aaar69member/subscribe"> <div> <div> <h2>Get an email whenever Ali Alzahrani, Editor publishes.</h2> <div><h3>Get an email whenever Ali Alzahrani, Editor publishes. By signing up, you will create a Medium account if you don't…</h3></div> <div><p>medium.com</p></div> </div> <div> <div style="background-image: url(https://miro.readmedium.com/v2/resize:fit:320/0*hM3RhYQ7aRYMopVt)"></div> </div> </div> </a> </div></article></body>

勇士登場 黑馬現身 季後賽首天拆局

ESPN設計的季後賽海報,今次不止關乎勇士三連霸,也影響多位自由身的走向,說是終極之戰並不為過。 pics: @espn NBA

季後賽周日開打,第一天就有金塊對馬刺出場,令人興奮;另外三場分別是76人對網隊,速龍對魔術,以及力爭三連霸的勇士迎戰快艇,以四個對賽組合來看,最大機會爆冷當然是馬刺。

  • (2) 金塊 vs. (7) 馬刺
  • 今季對賽:金塊2:2馬刺
  • X-factor:Derrick White(馬刺)vs Malik Beasley(金塊)
  • ESPN BPI預測:金塊71%機會晉級
  • 估計比分:馬刺4:3晉級

之前在蘋果的《NBA級Talk》節目中初步討論過季後賽形勢,當時Peter(不是我說的)認為,兩岸8支前四球隊中,最有機會被爆冷擊敗的,就是金塊。今季他們表現出色,由明星中鋒Nikola Jokic帶領,無論是球的流動、空間運用、球隊默契,以至防守上面,都打出一級水準,最後以54勝28負成為西岸第二,喜出望外,但對年輕的金塊來說,去到季後賽能否維持,才是關鍵。

兩軍今季對賽四次,兩勝兩負,毫不意外地皆由主隊勝出,這與昨日所寫的一樣,就是兩支球隊主場特佳,分列西岸一、二位,所以今個系列賽的勝負關鍵有三大重點,第一就是那隊能夠先作客偷一場。

在足球的歐聯賽事,去到淘汰賽的兩回合賽事,通常都認為先作客一隊有優勢,因為如取得作客入球,回到主場優勢就會很大。在NBA季後賽,當然沒有作客入球,但在這個極端重主場的系列,先作客要是能「偷」到一場,對主隊打擊會很大。兩隊相比,金塊是聯盟第二年輕的球隊,經驗不多,最有季後賽經驗的Isaiah Thomas也不見得有機會上陣,不比常規賽,在季後賽處逆境時的心理質素考驗極大。事實上,馬刺試過作客金塊只輸99:102,而金塊作客亦曾僅敗103:104,可見兩軍實力並非如種籽排名般的懸殊。

金塊的靈魂肯定是中鋒Jokic,他的傳球穩居長人第一把交椅,平均每場20.1分、10.8個籃板和7.3次助攻,難得是失誤僅3.1次,視野廣闊,由棒球長傳,到後手交back-door,都是球迷的享受,很有當年Vlade Divac或Arvydas Sabonis的影子。他的傳球對像是誰?當然是球隊第二得分手Jamal Murray,此子每場平均得18.2分,也是球隊第一射手(三分36.7%)及組織重心;金塊的殺着,就是這兩人的高低位連線,Murray每每走後門接應傳球,然後輕鬆上籃。今季聯盟有隊友之間的傳球統計,第1名是Jokic to Murray,每場達30次,而Murray to Jokic,亦高達24.8次,排在第5位。在對位上,馬刺料會用Jakob Poeltl作重心,再輔以其他球員不斷包夾Jokic,只要能夠降低其威力,以無球跑動及傳球為主的金塊體系,就如欠了發動機的汽車,難以前進。不要忘記,擁有射程去到18、19呎的LaMarcus Aldridge在陣,馬刺進攻時亦可以迫令Jokic離開籃底,令其他隊友乘機入楔。

馬刺進攻的關鍵,是DeMar DeRozan的表現。此子由要洗脫「泡泡龍」的污名,經過Coach Pop一季的改造,助攻數字去到每場6.2次,差不多是生涯的兩倍,也比上季多出一次;而在馬刺體系中,他更多時擔任控球及第一點突破,幫助隊友,但負面效果是本來不擅長的三分波表現更差,今季起手僅每場0.6次,命中率是15.6%,完全不構成威脅。有看馬刺的比賽都知,他很多時仍然改不了直線打法,在緊要關頭不理夾擊而硬上,反而累事。目前在馬刺的體系中,DeRozan不可或缺,但成也蕭何,敗也蕭何,能否真的走好線而連過兩關,打入西決,變數仍大。

兩隊風格相似,注重團體戰,但細微處有不同;金塊以傳球來組織攻勢,整體傳球數在聯盟排第7,達309.4次,而助攻則是聯盟第2,為27.4次,這多得Jokic和Murray兩人的風格都不自私;馬刺相比之下,由入楔再外傳(每場17.8次排12位)然後再突破等的機會較多,這與DeMar DeRozan的加盟有關。

所以內線以外,馬刺也要看球隊的X-Factor Derrick White。早說過這位球員是無名英雄,也是外線防守最好的一位,他肯定會被派去主力對付Jamal Murray,勢成此系列勝負的最大關鍵。

因為金塊的外圍太不可靠,在16支季後賽球隊中,以35.1%排在第14位,僅壓過雷霆和活塞(同得34.8%);球隊多名球員可以射三分,不過只有Monte Morris和Malik Beasley命中率逾4成(只計命中多於1球),令馬刺的防守更能針對地夾擊。相反馬刺的三分起手數雖是聯盟最少,只得25.3次,但命中率39.2%卻是№1,說不定這會成為勝負的分野,當金塊的外線防守不能收窄,更難剋制馬刺的打法。

結合經驗、對賽和球員實力分析,加上馬刺教練Gregg Popovich老謀深算,熟悉對手,我認為銀黑兵團可以4:3過關。就算IT賽前向隊友大送AirPods,士氣一振,但經驗會是這系列的最大分野。

  • (1) 勇士 vs. (8)快艇
  • 今季對賽:勇士3:1快艇
  • X-factor:Draymond Green(勇士)vs Montrezl Harrell(快艇
  • ESPN BPI預測:勇士89%機會晉級
  • 估計比分:勇士4:0晉級

ESPN預測勇士的晉級機會率是89%,而在很多勇士迷的心中,這個機會率應該再加10個巴仙才對;五星戰隊力爭三連霸,豈會在首圈就出局?

季中將頭號得分主力Tobias Harris送到76人,想不到快艇戰績不受影響,在Doc Rivers的帶領下,由交易當天的30勝26負,下半季仍能取得18勝8負,令人大跌眼鏡。快艇雖然沒有甚麼大牌球星,但Doc將他們訓練成整體戰的高手,每場用上12、13人去比賽,彈性大也令對手難以捉摸。Danilo Gallinari如不是傷患所困,成就一定更高,但在Harris離隊後,他與Lou Williams及Patrick Beverley合作帶起球隊,表現可靠。今季是少數的180 club成員,46.3%命中率、43.3%三分及90.4%罰球,難怪19.8分輕輕鬆鬆。快艇能否搶得一勝,Danilo是最重要的人物。

勇士今季表現失焦,後備實力遠不如前幾季,但這只是常規賽的表現。來到季後賽,預計會有一支完全不同的勇士隊,所以難以寄望快艇可以做到甚麼。這系列的關鍵,會是今季進攻一直飽受批評的Draymond Green,看他能否找回手感。勇士過關不難,最重要是小心保護Stephen Curry,不要讓他被Patrick Beverley的防守「咬傷」,正常發揮的話,可望以4:0過關。

  • (3) 76人 vs. (6) 網隊
  • 今季對賽:76人2:2網隊
  • X-factor:Mike Scott(76人)vs Spencer Dinwiddie(網隊)
  • ESPN BPI預測:76人79%機會晉級
  • 估計比分:76人4:1晉級

目前尚未知道,Joel Embiid能否於首戰復出,但以整體實力來看,76人絕不應該被網隊所困。正如上季首圈對熱火,也能以4:1輕鬆過關,那今季加入Jimmy Butler和Tobias Harris後,實力有所提昇,應該更為輕鬆。

可是這支76人的強弱也太分明:Joel Embiid和Ben Simmons這對新的1–2 punch有身材有技術,但進攻層面同樣不穩,後者的遠射是零,去到季後賽,將會是死穴;而球隊的純射手就只有JJ Redick,就算他狀態大勇,在今日注重外圍火力以打開防守缺口下,76人比起其他幾支東岸強隊,仍是不如。

樂觀去看,Mike Brown和Tobias Harris的遠射不差,在季後賽將是76人的重大助力, 後備席上的James Ennis、T.J. McConnell、Jonathon Simmons和Boban Marjanovic,也各有作用,只是在外圍上的火力差了一點。76人首圈要以戰養戰,預備次圈的大戰,今次對手肯定不再是塞爾特人,就看他們能否過關了。

  • (2) 速龍 vs. (7) 魔術
  • 今季對賽:速龍2:2魔術
  • X-factor:Nick Nurse(速龍)vs Aaron Gordon(魔術)
  • ESPN BPI預測:速龍89%機會晉級
  • 估計比分:速龍4:0晉級

不要被例行賽2:2的戰績所騙,速龍和魔術的實力完全不在同一個水平,尤其是季後賽,有豐富經驗加上Final MVP Kawhi Leonard壓陣的速龍,可望輕鬆殺退魔術,熱完身後再迎接76人或網隊的挑戰。

在東岸幾支爭霸球隊中,速龍相對低調,而球隊上下也知道,他們今季非勝不可,因為租借Kawhi的合約,將在6月「到期」,所以管理層一直千依百順,由上陣安排,到球隊打法,都讓Kwahi有「家的感覺」。在我心目中,Kawhi一直是聯盟的Top 3,就算捨馬刺而去,並攻守兩端的綜合實力,只在LBJ之後,其後應是KD、James Harden和Stephen Curry三人之爭。Kawhi在球季前半段手感一般,絕殺多次失手,但來到季尾的表現回升,全季26.6分、7.3籃板及3.3次助攻,附加1.8次偷波,以約34分鐘的上陣時間,非常不錯,得分也是生涯新高。

速龍的優勢是兵多將廣,放棄了Jonas Valanciunas,換來Marc Gasol,是一次升級,之後再簽下林書豪,也算是一個保險,如Kyle Lowry失準,組織較好的書豪會比Fred VanVleet為佳。力爭最佳進步獎的Pascal Siakam以及射手Danny Green,加上打4號位輕鬆得多的Serge Ibaka,就算OG Anunoby不幸闌尾炎而休戰兩星期,首圈過關仍不難。目前來看,速龍是東岸最有冠軍相的一隊,這四場比賽也將讓教練Nick Nurse展示功力,看看這位D League冠軍教頭,在NBA坐正後,首次出戰季後賽,其大膽用人和多變戰術能否繼續。雖然贏得冠軍未必能留下Kawhi,但在多支球隊都對其虎視眈眈下,速龍在季後賽行得多遠,將是能否留住大牌球星的重要條件。

而對魔術來說,速龍太強大了,他們就當是誤闖Jurassic Park,好好享受季後賽,然後放眼下季吧。Aaron Gordon鬥「阿琴」將是此系列的亮點,如前者有超人級的表現,魔術方有望偷到一勝。

Golden State Warriors
San Antonio Spurs
NBA Playoffs
Basketball
新季評論
Recommended from ReadMedium